General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Cornel West: Market-driven culture has destroyed virtue"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/08/27/cornel-west-market-driven-culture-has-destroyed-virtue/Cornel West speaks out on how America has been corrupted by materalism.
See video at link.
dawg
(10,624 posts)marmar
(77,073 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)... what is his alternative model and how does he propose to get there?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)1963, back then we had the same 'model' and basic system as we do now, but people retained some ethics and standards and that is not about changing the economic system it is about healing the corruption that has taken over our culture so fully.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)We've gotten into this sorry mess because it's our own damn fault.
We as a society allowed people with rotten values and ethics con and bulldoze us into accepting a phony set of principles.
The answer is that we wake the fuck up and collectively start acting better and demanding better from out institutions, government and leaders.
The fault is not in our stars but in ourselves.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)TBF
(32,047 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)Mass marketing consumerism as a norm is primary in destroying individuals, cultures/societies, and the planet itself.
It's another reason why the Third Way is so insidiously deadly; it replaces the needs of human beings with the needs of the global free market as the core of Democratic Party ideology.
KatyMan
(4,190 posts)Guy Debord, 1967. A summary from Wiki:
The spectacle is the inverted image of society in which relations between commodities have supplanted relations between people, in which "passive identification with the spectacle supplants genuine activity". "The spectacle is not a collection of images," Debord writes, "rather, it is a social relationship between people that is mediated by images."
I think the Situationists were really onto something...
ETA: ... just as early industrial capitalism moved the focus of existence from being to having, post-industrial culture has moved that focus from having to appearing.
and:
The story of terrorism is written by the state and it is therefore highly instructive
compared with terrorism, everything else must be acceptable, or in any case more rational and democratic.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)I think he's pretty well off. he makes a year's wage for lower middle class folks per speech.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)making money, just that making money into the central be all and end all life is a problem. He's a Christian, their teaching is not that money is evil, but that the love of money is indeed the root of all evil. The difference between the two things is not rocket science and far from original to West. It's basic Jesus 101.
So where do you disagree with what he's saying?
QC
(26,371 posts)It's a cherished belief on the Right--and like many other Rightist talking points, increasingly common on DU--that progressives who have money are hypocrites.
This is especially true of progressives who have criticized You Know Who, which is West's real sin here.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)amid the OBSCENE PROPAGANDA and LIES.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)because it is in fact a hotly protected commodity brokered by his family, such as Bernice the homophobe, which controls the use and demands large fees for that which they did not create as if Dr King had been a Tin Pan Alley tunesmith instead of a minister and national leader. To hear his words, you have to pay the family, and they do not care for much of the text to be known, they fear it would diminish the value of the famous bits if folks heard the parts about poverty and peace and all. Dr King had a dream, and that dream is a product his family handles like you handle royalties on episodes of My Mother the Car.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)for the first time last night. And I'm 52.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)money, and his book royalties. When he died, he left too little to probate.
Bernice needs to grow in her acceptance, definitely, but even homophobes are allowed to hold copyrights.
http://pamshouseblend.firedoglake.com/2012/01/17/the-amazing-turnaround-of-bernice-king-on-lgbt-rights/
Samantha
(9,314 posts)Totally excellent interview by Shuster. I was happy to see him working with Al Jazeera America.
Sam
watoos
(7,142 posts)I worked for a company, that had a president who visited my plant, who talked to the workers, who considered the workers assets.
Fast forward to today, I work for a corporation, who has a CEO, COO, CFO and C whatever else. Today the CEO lives and works far away from the plant, he considers the workers liabilities, costs to the bottom line. His allegiance is to stockholders and to meeting the bottom line, whatever it takes, which usually turns out to be cutting jobs.
If workers won't help to meet the bottom line by wage and benefit cuts he will gladly move the plant to China.
Multiply my 1 plant by 10,000.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)We are owned & they know it. Oh how they must laugh at our plight.
When you give up, go Wall St. They are waiting with open arms for more foot soldiers and salivate at the prospect of more financial supporters greedily donating money & labor to their ends.
Or don't, be a liberal. They hate that.
QC
(26,371 posts)The former has its benefits, but the latter is an unmitigated evil.
OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)Blue Owl
(50,349 posts)Everything is about BUSINESS these days.
Especially BIG Business.