General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVirginia Teabagger stands on highway overpass with automatic weapon, pistol, and Impeach Obama sign
http://wtvr.com/2013/08/27/constitutionalist-carries-assault-rifle-protests-obama/HOPEWELL, Va. (WTVR) A local Tea Party member has been protesting perched above busy overpasses, with his assault rifle and semi-automatic handgun in plain sight.
I was illegally searched, my weapons were illegally taken from me, I was illegally detained. I was publicly humiliated.
We asked Howard if he escalated the demonstration for publicity. He said no.
If youre a sworn officer to uphold the law, it might make sense to know the law youre trying to uphold, was his retort.
VIDEO at link
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)"Why is every-body always pick-ing on me?"
Sometime in the future, someone will misread one of these "protests" and take the doofus out from behind.
underpants
(182,750 posts)and they got ordered off for "safety reasons" or were actually arrested? I do. I'm not arguing with you at all but when I heard this on the radio (the local RW radio host even called this stunt "dumb" I remembered all of the instances where no guns were involved and they still were told to "move along".
second - the guy clearly knows the law but he might have the right to do it but it isn't the right thing to do. Most people don't know gun laws THAT well and when they see someone with a gun they call the cops.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)I was being sarcastic about the clock tower quip. This clown was a danger to all that passed over or under the overpass. He may have a "right" to stand on an overpass waving a gun, but with such a right comes responsibility. It's not responsible to stand on an overpass waving your gun, lest someone will misread your protest and take you out from behind.
underpants
(182,750 posts)I just wanted to point out how "the left" was treated doing the same thing (without guns).
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)The dimwit with the guns, on the other hand...
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)It was hilarious.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)your 15 seconds are over now .
Turbineguy
(37,315 posts)Did Rush Limbaugh promise them 72 virgins?
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)Turbineguy
(37,315 posts)icymist
(15,888 posts)From the article:
<snip>
However, the chief says, and legal experts agree, that theres a fine line between individual rights and public safety. University of Richmond law professor Jack Preis references Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. opinion in Schenck v. United States, often paraphrased as shouting fire in a crowded theater.
Holmes ruling addressed the opposition of free speech and clear and present danger. Thus, even if citizens have the right to free speech, falsely yelling fire could incite panic and create danger. The ruling was later overturned by a 1969 case that limited the scope of banned speech to that which may incite lawless action.
<un-snip>
We're one step closer to bringing back the wild west! Yee Haw!
mysuzuki2
(3,521 posts)Just ask the singers in the Wisconsin capitol.
icymist
(15,888 posts)The cops have guns and the politicians work for the money interests.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Can you hear me laughing at you, Mr. Teabagger?
Brother Buzz
(36,412 posts)It is genetically impossible publicly humiliate a teabagger.
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)Publicly humiliated.
underpants
(182,750 posts)He believes those voice coming from his dashboard - I would guess a Glenn Beck devotee. RW radio begins every story by playing victim.
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)KinMd
(966 posts)with semi automatic weapons? They'd call in an air strike
polichick
(37,152 posts)JHB
(37,158 posts)Just think of how they've milked the New Black Panther Party, without providing evidence that it has enough members to fill a school bus.
westerebus
(2,976 posts)Some things you just can't fix.
underpants
(182,750 posts)Ha! spot on westerebus
shenmue
(38,506 posts)We've got another one.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Doesn't say what the arrest was for. If he had a right to have the gun, then it doesn't seem there was any reason to arrest him.
Exercising the right to free speech - it's for idiots, too.
WCLinolVir
(951 posts)In the wild west the guns were holstered. These asses carry assault rifles in hand and I would not blame someone for taking someone out, because if their judgment is so impaired to take such a weapon into a public space, then they can't be trusted.
ck4829
(35,042 posts)Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)In fact that's what we need to do to most all the baggers.