General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBravo Obama!
Well, he's probably not earning the Bravo. Premature of me, like the Nobel.
But bravo majority in House of Commons!
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)I miss him
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)kentuck
(111,079 posts)There would be political consequences.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)And people actually scoff when I say this is Bush's 4th term.
Reagan was his hero. GHWB is one of the "thousand points of light." GWB "faced the storm head on"?
I'd ask if I were dreaming, but I can't make shit like this up.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Thank you to the British. You guys are awesome!
It is nice to see they did learn something from Iraq after all.
Baclava
(12,047 posts)WASHINGTON President Obama is prepared to move ahead with a limited military strike on Syria, administration officials said on Thursday, even with a rejection of such action by Britains Parliament, an increasingly restive Congress, and lacking an endorsement from the United Nations Security Council.
The intelligence does not tie Mr. Assad directly to the attack, officials briefed on the presentation said, but the administration believes that it has enough evidence to carry out a limited strike that would deter the Syrian government from using these weapons again
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/30/us/politics/obama-syria.html?_r=1&
quinnox
(20,600 posts)He has been consistent in saying he thinks the USA should not act alone, ever since he was a candidate. If even Great Britain, our closet ally and friend on the world stage, won't go along with this, I tend to think that is a slam-dunk for preventing any action, at least for now. But I could be wrong, and Obama could surprise me, granted.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)as a candidate that no longer count, I am sad to say; or at least it seems that way.
JEB
(4,748 posts)Now that would be solo. I want nothing to do with any attacks on Syria.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)That would be "solo" indeed.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)I voted for this guy twice and went to a rally where he spoke. I feel like a sucker now.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)They will remain pissed even if everyone falls into line. It's in the nature of those who have appointed themselves 24/7 protectors of ideological orthodoxy.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)"John McCain's campaign has gone even further, suggesting that the best answer for the growing pressures on Social Security might be to cut cost-of-living adjustments or raise the retirement age. Let me be clear: I will not do either,"
It's coming back to me why I thought I was voting for a liberal.