Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:20 PM Aug 2013

Kerry wants Americans to read the US intel report on Syria for themselves. Here it is

E McMorris-Santoro ‏@EvanMcSan 1m

John Kerry wants Americans to read the US intel report on Syria for themselves. Here it is in its entirety: http://www.buzzfeed.com/lisatozzi/here-is-the-us-assessment-of-the-syrian-governments-use-of-c


Here Is The U.S. Assessment Of The Syrian Government’s Use Of Chemical Weapons

“The United States Government assesses with high confidence that the Syrian government carried out a chemical weapons attack in the Damascus suburbs on August 21, 2013.” posted on August 30, 2013 at 1:10pm EDT
Lisa Tozzi BuzzFeed Staff

A preliminary U.S. government assessment released Thursday states that 1,429 people were killed in the chemical weapons attack earlier this month, including at least 426 children and puts the blame on the Syrian government for the attacks.

(REPORT EMBEDDED here)

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kerry wants Americans to read the US intel report on Syria for themselves. Here it is (Original Post) Catherina Aug 2013 OP
What department is putting this report out? State Department, CIA, DOD, NSA? notadmblnd Aug 2013 #1
They have none. The UK House of Commons LAUGHED at this report Catherina Aug 2013 #6
Is that why they voted Cameron down? KoKo Aug 2013 #13
Yes. "Israeli intelligence 'intercepted Syrian regime talk about chemical attack'" Catherina Aug 2013 #23
Thanks Much...for those Links...put it into perspective and Good Reads KoKo Aug 2013 #39
None of that makes it legal to attack Syria malaise Aug 2013 #2
Nope, none of it. It may have taken 6 countries of the same lies but people catch on n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #7
Yep truth will out malaise Aug 2013 #10
+1 sarcasmo Aug 2013 #35
Kerry wants the Middle class and poor to pay for this war. Dr Fate Aug 2013 #3
Yeah lol, like Elliot Engels support to strike now and get *assent* from Congress later Catherina Aug 2013 #9
This is an executive summary nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #4
Thanks! I was going to go look for it. You saved me the effort. Little Star Aug 2013 #5
You're welcome. It kind of just landed in my lap lol n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #14
So many lols in one thread....so many dead kids...nice. Nt pkdu Aug 2013 #30
The question will always go back to what positive influence will a military approach accomplish? Jefferson23 Aug 2013 #8
If it's so obvious, SOS Kerry, why are so many countries withholding support?? reformist2 Aug 2013 #11
Drop a drone... KansDem Aug 2013 #12
Follow up report on MSNBC from Richard Engle says it was Assad's Brother KoKo Aug 2013 #15
We collect a billion communications A DAY... KansDem Aug 2013 #18
No, not "simple"..... but certainly a simplistic approach. bvar22 Aug 2013 #26
"simplistic?" KansDem Aug 2013 #37
And who was the source of that bogus intel? Government leaked "Sounds and whispers" from an ally Catherina Aug 2013 #24
Where is the report on the effects of depleted Uranium in Iraq? dixiegrrrrl Aug 2013 #16
Well yeah see but you've been paying attention. They didn't think so many of us were. Catherina Aug 2013 #25
Meant to give you a pat on the back dixiegrrrrl Aug 2013 #33
Yes mick063 Aug 2013 #17
Is this the same type of evidence US Intel gave to Bush and Congress... TheProgressive Aug 2013 #19
I'm not highly confident in their "high confidence." Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2013 #20
But baby! I wouldn't lie to you! Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #21
Most on target (pun intended) post in the thread. woo me with science Aug 2013 #22
Indeed! The "declassified intel" report contains not a shred of evidence to support it. pinboy3niner Aug 2013 #28
"I'm asking you Sugar, Would I Lie To You?" It's alright, Baby's not coming back... Catherina Aug 2013 #32
oh, right. US intel would never lie. yep, I gonna trust the same apparatus that told KG Aug 2013 #27
If you'd like your own personal copy that you can share with your great-grandchildren... DreamGypsy Aug 2013 #29
Now it's 1429. This morning it was maybe 300. Exhume all these bodies, lets count them. The_Casual_Observer Aug 2013 #31
And we are going to drop hot death metal and explosions on how many more??? dixiegrrrrl Aug 2013 #34
It called killing for peace. They have to teach this thorn a lesson. Meanwhile The_Casual_Observer Aug 2013 #36
They're next to get droned! durablend Aug 2013 #38
"multiple streams of intelligence" whttevrr Aug 2013 #40

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
1. What department is putting this report out? State Department, CIA, DOD, NSA?
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:24 PM
Aug 2013

They all seem to work in the interest of the military industrial complex. How could they possibly have any credibility with the American people at this point?

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
6. They have none. The UK House of Commons LAUGHED at this report
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:30 PM
Aug 2013

pointing out that it was 2 pages on A-4 paper based on Israeli intelligence and did the US really think them daft enough to authorize war over those 2 pages (front and back).

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
13. Is that why they voted Cameron down?
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:38 PM
Aug 2013

Last edited Fri Aug 30, 2013, 02:30 PM - Edit history (1)

I hadn't heard it was based on Israeli intelligence. Kerry seemed to say it was our own NSA...but, then..I guess with Snowden's release it could definitely come from Israeli intel...because we are tied in with theirs.


Catherina

(35,568 posts)
23. Yes. "Israeli intelligence 'intercepted Syrian regime talk about chemical attack'"
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 02:44 PM
Aug 2013

[link: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023548127|Israeli intelligence 'intercepted Syrian regime talk about chemical attack']

Israeli intelligence 'intercepted Syrian regime talk about chemical attack'

Information passed to US by Israeli Defence Forces's 8200 unit, former official tells magazine


Harriet Sherwood in Jerusalem
theguardian.com, Wednesday 28 August 2013 09.25 BST

Israeli military intelligence provided key evidence of the Syrian regime's deployment of chemical weapons to US officials last week, according to the German magazine Focus.

The 8200 unit of the Israeli Defence Forces, which specialises in electronic surveillance, intercepted a conversation between Syrian officials regarding the use of chemical weapons, an unnamed former Mossad official told Focus. The content of the conversation was relayed to the US, the ex-official said.

The 8200 unit collects and analyses electronic data, including wiretapped telephone calls and emails. It is the largest unit in the IDF.

...

Senior Israeli security officials arrived in Washington on Monday to share the latest results of intelligence gathering, and to review the Syrian crisis with national security adviser Susan Rice.

...

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/28/israeli-intelligence-intercepted-syria-chemical-talk

Do you remember the Office of Special Plans for Iraq?

...

Not surprisingly, perhaps, it turns out that the same people are responsible for both. According to current and former US intelligence analysts and government officials, the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans funneled information, unchallenged, from Ahmad Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress (INC) to Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, who in turn passed it on to the White House, suggesting that Iraqis would welcome the American invaders. The Office of Special Plans is led by Abram Shulsky, a hawkish neoconservative ideologue who got his start in politics working alongside Elliott Abrams in Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson's office in the 1970s. It was set up in fall 2001 as a two-man shop, but it burgeoned into an eighteen-member nerve center of the Pentagon's effort to distort intelligence about Iraq's WMDs and terrorist connections. A great deal of the bad information produced by Shulsky's office, which found its way into speeches by Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, came from Chalabi's INC. Since the INC itself was sustained by its neocon allies in Washington, including the shadow "Central Command" at the American Enterprise Institute, it stands as perhaps the ultimate example of circular reasoning.

...

According to the former official, also feeding information to the Office of Special Plans was a secret, rump unit established last year in the office of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of Israel. This unit, which paralleled Shulsky's--and which has not previously been reported--prepared intelligence reports on Iraq in English (not Hebrew) and forwarded them to the Office of Special Plans. It was created in Sharon's office, not inside Israel's Mossad intelligence service, because the Mossad--which prides itself on extreme professionalism--had views closer to the CIA's, not the Pentagon's, on Iraq. This secretive unit, and not the Mossad, may well have been the source of the forged documents purporting to show that Iraq tried to purchase yellowcake uranium for weapons from Niger in West Africa, according to the former official.

...
http://www.thenation.com/article/more-missing-intelligence


Iran Syria Policy and Operations Group

The Iran Syria Policy and Operations Group (ISOG) was an interagency organization formed in early 2006 within the U.S. government, consisting of officials from the State Department, White House, Central Intelligence Agency, Treasury Department, and other agencies that worked, to influence regime change in Iran, and to influence its access to world banking and credit institutions. Co-chaired by Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, and Elliot Abrams, the former staffer for Ronald Reagan who was convicted of two felonies in the Iran-Contra scandal, the secretive group met weekly for about a year, also working to a lesser extent on Syria, in order to encourage regime change.[1] Other members of the group's steering committee were James F. Jeffrey, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, who had headed the Iraq Policy group, and Michael Doran, a Middle East specialist from the White House.

Day to day operations were handled by David Denehy, a senior adviser on Near Eastern Affairs at the State Department, and a former official with the International Republican Institute. The group originally was "housed" in the same Pentagon offices that had housed the Office of Special Plans, the group that laid the groundwork for the United States invasion of Iraq.[2] Before the group's dissoluton, Denehy moved his office from the State Department to the office of the Vice-President and continued to manage the group's affairs from there.[3] The group operated for little more than a year, with a beginning budget of $7 million dollars that grew to $80 million. The group drew public scrutiny when leaks from the State Department revealed that, rather than have the program administered by career State Department staffers, or contracted via a bid process, the program was outsourced to BearingPoint, a private corporation specializing in discreet management, whose previous experience included such tasks as overseeing the "emergent" economic development in former USSR countries, and the more recent privatization of gold mines in Khazakstan. ISOG's first BearingPoint staffers had also been hired to man the controversial Iraq Policy and Operations Group. [4] Critics of the outsourcing maneuver cited it as an effort to circumvent the normal diplomatic channels and federal transparency guidelines and laws.[5]

The group had 5 "pillars:"

a military group that explored military aid to Oman, Bahrain, and United Arab Emirates and sought to influence the flow of weaponry into Iran.
"democracy outreach" group that provided secret financial assistance to groups inside Syria and Iran in an attempt to promote regime change.
an economic "development" group that sought to control Iran's access to credit, and to international banking services
a "special relationships" group that scrutinized the interactions of Iran with Lebanon, Syria, Afghanistan, and independent terrorist organizations.
a media outreach group that targeted the people of Iran, Syria, and the Persian Gulf region.
...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Syria_Policy_and_Operations_Group


These criminals just reinvent themselves, new groups, new names, different people in charge but the same bullshit, the same lies, the same methods and the same endgame.

Iran. The grand prize.





You have to look at these things like you look at a 30 year corporate plant the parasitic corporate class is so fond off. Iran was always the grand prize for neocon cold war hawks who think they have to cut Russia off at its knees. Brzezinski, "The Grand Chess Game". They've all been working together for decades on this.

Meanwhile even a 2 year plan to hold on to our social services in the US? Not feasible. Can't afford it. Liars.

malaise

(268,987 posts)
10. Yep truth will out
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:34 PM
Aug 2013

Recall Congress or STFU - have the guts to do what the Brits did last night. Stop bullying the fugging world.

Dr Fate

(32,189 posts)
3. Kerry wants the Middle class and poor to pay for this war.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:28 PM
Aug 2013

And I agree with him 100%.

This is NOT the time to raise taxes on the job creators or any of Kerry's other friends.

We need to have a NEW war NOW- no- yesterday-- and discuss how the middle class will pay for this one later.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
9. Yeah lol, like Elliot Engels support to strike now and get *assent* from Congress later
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:32 PM
Aug 2013

Good sarcasm. You're too good at it.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
4. This is an executive summary
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:28 PM
Aug 2013

To their credit this is usually classified as well.

I guess videos, photos and satellite imagery would bolster case...that will not be declassed.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
8. The question will always go back to what positive influence will a military approach accomplish?
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:31 PM
Aug 2013

None that I can conceive of.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
12. Drop a drone...
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:37 PM
Aug 2013

If it was the Syrian Government, then find the head of that government and drop a drone.

Use those satellites reported this a.m. On "Democracy Now!" that pinpointed Osama's location for Seal Team Six and drop a drone.

We use them to kill a 15-year-old American citizen so we shouldn't be shy about the head of a government that gassed it's own people.

So...drop a drone.

What's the hue-and-cry all about. Just drop a drone and we'll all be home by 5pm...

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
15. Follow up report on MSNBC from Richard Engle says it was Assad's Brother
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:42 PM
Aug 2013

who possibly was responsible. I imagine if that's the case your idea of the Drone would be what they might want to do. Or, think they can do....along with hitting a few of the chemical storage units near borders.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
18. We collect a billion communications A DAY...
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:56 PM
Aug 2013

Tell the NSA guys to stop spying on their ex-girlfriends and start sifting. The name of the responsible party has got to be in there somewhere.

Then, once identified, drop a drone.

Simple...

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
26. No, not "simple"..... but certainly a simplistic approach.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 02:56 PM
Aug 2013


You will know them by their [font size=3]WORKS.[/font]

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
37. "simplistic?"
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 04:26 PM
Aug 2013

What's complex about what happened. We collect a billion communications a day. Somebody ordered the attack; somebody made the gas; somebody provided the gas.

Somebody is responsible for the gas strikes. Found out who it is and drop a drone on him.

Why is that "simplistic?" Do we really have to have another invasion lasting 10 years of more?

It's not 9/10/2001 anymore...

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
24. And who was the source of that bogus intel? Government leaked "Sounds and whispers" from an ally
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 02:44 PM
Aug 2013

"Sounds and Whispers" but the 2013 version should be called "Lies and Whispers"



Don't you know
They're talkin' bout a revolution
It sounds like a whisper
Don't you know
They're talkin' about a revolution
It sounds like a whisper
While they're standing in the welfare lines
Crying at the doorsteps of those armies of salvation
Wasting time in the unemployment lines
Sitting around waiting for a promotion

Poor people gonna rise up
And get their share
Poor people gonna rise up
And take what's theirs

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
33. Meant to give you a pat on the back
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 03:54 PM
Aug 2013

for all the nice reports and news you have been posting of late on Syria.

And, to say, while Al-jazeera and etc may not be "reputable" for LBN, they are oft used in other forums.
Christ,if we stuck to MSN, we would not know squat.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
17. Yes
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:49 PM
Aug 2013

And 800,000 men, women, and children were butchered in Rwanda.


It is really quite simple to see. There is always more to the story than brutality upon innocent civilians. We have been bystanders to Cambodia, North Korea, etc., etc. One must ask what makes Syria different than the rest.

Our inconsistent message to the world deserves their mistrust. Obviously, we implement "humanitarian" war only if potential profit is in store.

 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
19. Is this the same type of evidence US Intel gave to Bush and Congress...
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 02:03 PM
Aug 2013

Meaning, is this 'evidence' fabricated? Yes it appears 1,400+ Syrians were killed.
But who did it and how? No really...who and how?

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
21. But baby! I wouldn't lie to you!
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 02:34 PM
Aug 2013

Trust me! I've changed!

Those other wars meant nothing to me. You're the war for me!

Baby, ya got to believe meeeee!

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
28. Indeed! The "declassified intel" report contains not a shred of evidence to support it.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 03:03 PM
Aug 2013

It's merely a characterization, with not even a snippet of an extract from an excerpt to back it up.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
32. "I'm asking you Sugar, Would I Lie To You?" It's alright, Baby's not coming back...
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 03:15 PM
Aug 2013

Two different songs I know but the correlation is there



KG

(28,751 posts)
27. oh, right. US intel would never lie. yep, I gonna trust the same apparatus that told
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 03:01 PM
Aug 2013

us all those truths about iraq, too.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
34. And we are going to drop hot death metal and explosions on how many more???
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 04:01 PM
Aug 2013

I am so pissed right now
all the while knowing that it does no good
it doesn't matter
reality is reality
etc etc etc
but sitting here, knowing full well that more deaths are being planned,
makes me wish I drank.

 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
36. It called killing for peace. They have to teach this thorn a lesson. Meanwhile
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 04:09 PM
Aug 2013

desperate minimum wage workers risked what little they have to strike for more money in this great and noble land.

durablend

(7,460 posts)
38. They're next to get droned!
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 04:34 PM
Aug 2013

Greedy MOFOS don't realize how good they have it here. FREEDOMS!!!!!! USA!!!! USA!!!! USA!!!! WE'RE NUMBER 1!!!!

whttevrr

(2,345 posts)
40. "multiple streams of intelligence"
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:57 PM
Aug 2013

Is that the same as 'trickle down information'?

Either way it seems to me that the average Joe is going to get soaked. And the stream of trickle does not appear to be water.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kerry wants Americans to ...