General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe number of children and teens killed by guns in one year would fill 134 classrooms of 20 students
The cover of the recent Children's Defense Fund report (pdf) on gun violence in the United States carries a single statistic:
The number of children and teens killed by guns in one year would fill 134 classrooms of 20 students each.
That's just a more dramatic way of stating an already staggering figure 2,694 in 2010. Most of the report's 73 following pages are devoted to restating it. Sometimes, this done to illustrate the chilling frequency of such deaths:
One child or teen died every 3 hours and 15 minutes
Seven children and teens died every day, more than 20 every three days
Fifty-one children and teens died every week
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/10/guns-kids-casualties-america
billh58
(6,635 posts)Gungeoneer supporters, these 'facts" are irrelevant and just the price we must pay for our Second Amendment freedom to kill and main other Americans with lethal weapons on a daily basis. It's the "American Way," and our deadly gun culture must not be "controlled" by people who don't truly understand guns, how they function mechanically, which gun features assist with more accurate kills, and all of the good and warmth that they bring into our lives.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Does anybody believe that passing a law that would make having and carrying a gun more difficult for me (Perfectly clean police record, no history of violence, 67 years old) would have any effect on the Bloods, Crips or any of the other violent gangs?
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)whew! It's not my problem...
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)How would restricting MY guns have any effect on the gangs?
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)what we used to say back in the anti-war days: "If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the problem."
billh58
(6,635 posts)always missing from that tired old argument, is: the guns that the Crips and the Bloods use once belonged to someone who purchased them legally. The "legal" purchasers either sold, gave, or "lost" their guns to criminals while exercising their Second Amendment rights to enable the gun culture and gun violence in this country.
Gunners were allowed to transfer these "legal" guns to criminals because the NRA has purchased enough politicians over the years to defeat any sort of sane legislation that would make the tracking and accountability of guns a commonplace practice. Instead, the American version of an open black market for guns is a thriving business in this country, and the NRA and its apologists rejoice in the ensuing violence because it gives them an excuse to enact SYG and CCW laws so that the "good guys with a gun" can strut their stuff. Case in point: Trayvon Martin and the Gungeoneer's hero -- Georgie Zimmerman.
"My right to own a gun trumps your right to life," so say the cold-dead-hands gun nuts who fill our streets with guns, both "legal" and illegal on a daily basis.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Highly populated areas accounted for the vast majority of gang homicides: nearly 70 percent occurred in cities with populations over 100,000, and 19 percent occurred in suburban counties in 2011.
http://www.nationalgangcenter.gov/Survey-Analysis/Measuring-the-Extent-of-Gang-Problems
Not that it matters, because people killed by gangs are still people, regardless of how little you care about them.
As far as whether a law specifically targeting you as an individual, that probably wouldn't make much difference. But if the law applied to everyone, and not just you, then yes it would make a difference.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)...and make them sound like school age kids.
otohara
(24,135 posts)Don't care if they are 12 or 19.
My friend who's 9 year old was shot in the head would still be a broken woman if he would have been college age.
Imagine the visual of your child's brains being splattered in an instant.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Adorable, innocent schoolchildren evoke strong protective instincts in the vast majority of people. If the controllers can establish an association between those homicide numbers and those adorable kids (despite such an association's nebulous-at-best connection to reality), it's effective stuff.
Robb
(39,665 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)Amazing that the NRAers are still trying to tell us that this isn't a big deal.