Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whttevrr

(2,345 posts)
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 09:49 AM Sep 2013

"There was no single person who had a complete technical understanding," The NSA machine: Too big fo

The NSA machine: Too big for anyone to understand
http://news.yahoo.com/nsa-machine-too-big-anyone-understand-071323221--politics.html

More yahoo woo for the masses...

WASHINGTON (AP) — The surveillance machine grew too big for anyone to understand.

The National Security Agency set it in motion in 2006 and the vast network of supercomputers, switches and wiretaps began gathering Americans' phone and Internet records by the millions, looking for signs of terrorism.

But every day, NSA analysts snooped on more American phone records than they were allowed to. Some officials searched databases of phone records without even realizing it. Others shared the results of their searches with people who weren't authorized to see them.

It took nearly three years before the government figured out that so much had gone wrong. It took even longer to figure out why.

Newly declassified documents released Tuesday tell a story of a surveillance apparatus so unwieldy and complex that nobody fully comprehended it, even as the government pointed it at the American people in the name of protecting them.

"There was no single person who had a complete technical understanding," government lawyers explained to a federal judge in 2009.


The only people who did not understand what was going on was Congress and The American People. The techno gear heads in charge knew what was going on. The people setting this up new what was going on. It is ridiculous to think government lawyers were being honest when they said: "There was no single person who had a complete technical understanding,"

That is complete Bullshit. The spooks in charge knew exactly what they were creating.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"There was no single person who had a complete technical understanding," The NSA machine: Too big fo (Original Post) whttevrr Sep 2013 OP
Yeah, right. jsr Sep 2013 #1
Not sure if that is agreement... whttevrr Sep 2013 #3
The NSA is full of shit. jsr Sep 2013 #4
oh ok... whttevrr Sep 2013 #6
Yup. Complete bullshit. djean111 Sep 2013 #2
"complete technical understanding" -- that's one hell of a big out. unblock Sep 2013 #5
It's a shame you had to state the obvious! randome Sep 2013 #7
I think "technically" Clapper knew exactly what he was doing... whttevrr Sep 2013 #8
The person behind everything the NSA was and is doing is General Keith Alexander. RC Sep 2013 #9
Him too whttevrr Sep 2013 #11
The best way to fuck somebody over rrneck Sep 2013 #10
that's what Greenspan said about derivatives: they were beyond human understanding MisterP Sep 2013 #12

whttevrr

(2,345 posts)
6. oh ok...
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 10:05 AM
Sep 2013

The "yeah, right" was to the premise of the article...

I like this gem:

And when Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was asked whether the government was doing that, he testified, "No."


Ha ha ha... That is completely Bullshittoriffic.

unblock

(52,286 posts)
5. "complete technical understanding" -- that's one hell of a big out.
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 10:02 AM
Sep 2013

bill gates never had "complete technical understanding" of everything microswift was up to.
steve jobs never had "complete technical understanding" of everything at apple.

plenty of people at nsa no doubt understand exactly what they're doing for all moral and ethical and practical purposes, but perhaps didn't completely understand the math behind the cryptography or the cooling requirements of the computers.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
7. It's a shame you had to state the obvious!
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 10:09 AM
Sep 2013

[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

whttevrr

(2,345 posts)
8. I think "technically" Clapper knew exactly what he was doing...
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 10:09 AM
Sep 2013

Saying "not wittingly" was disingenuous at best.

I wonder if that will be the escape hatch used to hide this from public scrutiny:

"No one knew."

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
9. The person behind everything the NSA was and is doing is General Keith Alexander.
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 11:31 AM
Sep 2013

He knows exactly what the NSA is doing, because he made it happen.

whttevrr

(2,345 posts)
11. Him too
Reply to RC (Reply #9)
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 11:50 AM
Sep 2013

He's been doing this stuff for years... Alexander has the Kuwait Liberation Medal. So, he's been working it for a while from within the Military. But he really got the ball rolling when, as a three star general, he was picked to be the Director of the National Security Agency in 2005.

Both Alexander and Clapper have been building this thing together. Clapper was the Defense Intelligence Agency Director from 1992-1995... And then in 2003 he explained that the WMD's we could not find in Iraq were sent to Syria. He was a general back in 1985...

These guys are two peas in a pod. They know not only where the bodies are buried, but who fucked the corpse... and... they probably have the video on a loop every time they talk to anyone who even questions them.

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
10. The best way to fuck somebody over
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 11:36 AM
Sep 2013

is to fix it so that they depend on you and then simply do nothing.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
12. that's what Greenspan said about derivatives: they were beyond human understanding
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 03:09 PM
Sep 2013

(just the first step in making finance our new god)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"There was no single...