General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is a complete list of Wall Street CEOs prosecuted for their role in the financial crisis
Five years after Lehman fell, taking the global economy along with it, a roll call of Wall Street CEOs serving time for their role in the crisis looks something like this:
So, yeah. Zero Wall Street CEOs are in jail. But we did promise you a list:
1. No one.
2. LOL.
3. Wall Street's lawyers are amazing.
4. Etc. Etc.
It's not that federal government tried to prosecute a bunch of them but lost the cases. There were no serious efforts at criminal prosecutions at all.
Which isn't to say nobody is in jail. There have been prosecutions of various mortgage brokers and other small fish who lied or encouraged clients to lie on their applications for a home loan. The crisis exposed some outright fraudsters who are now in the slammer, such as Bernie Madoff and Allen Stanford. And, yes, major banks have been working through billions of dollars in civil settlements for shady behavior in the runup to the crisis.
http://m.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/09/12/this-is-a-complete-list-of-wall-street-ceos-prosecuted-for-their-role-in-the-financial-crisis/
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)To be fair, these finance heroes can't be sent to jail; they're too big to fail. If they go to the Big House, our economy will tank, or so we're told.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)waiting in the corporate wings. The CEOs would get used to less if we forced them to.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)But thought better of it.
But essentially, yes, if we send these talented CEOs who have a special knack for tanking companies and receiving huge bonuses off to jail, where are we going to find their replacements? That kind of talent pool is not limitless, you know?
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Thank Gawd!
Uncle Joe
(58,363 posts)finding fresh replacements is "hard work."
Particulary if the top sharks get caught in the net.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)... were Occupy protesters who were exercising their First Amendment rights trying to inform people about the corrupt system. Such people, under our system, are more dangerous than the people who tank economies of scale for profit.
Don't you know this?
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Occupy Wall Street protester could face up to 13 years in jail, $13,000 fine for writing anti-bank messages in chalk
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/06/27/occupy-wall-street-protester-could-face-up-to-13-years-in-jail-13000-fine-for-writing-anti-bank-messages-in-chalk/
http://www.10news.com/news/verdict-in-san-diego-chalk-vandalism-case-070113
mick063
(2,424 posts)I don't know what to make of your post. It seems you are defending the concept of Wall Street immunity.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)... but many suffered incarceration because they dared speak up about the real criminals in this country.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Hmmmm. What to do?