Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 12:46 PM Sep 2013

Lac Megantic Train Was Carrying Mislabeled Oil, Officials Say

Canadian officials say the oil carried by the train that derailed in July in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, flattening the town center and killing 47 people, was mislabeled as being less volatile than it actually was.

In a press release Wednesday morning, Canada's Transportation Safety Board said it had analyzed oil from a part of the 72-car train that didn't explode and found it had the characteristics of a Packing Group II product. However, the oil -- which came from North Dakota -- had been labeled as a Packing Group III product when it was loaded onto the train.

While both groups are considered "dangerous goods," Packing Group II includes liquids like gasoline that explode at a lower temperature than Packing Group III.

The fact the oil was mislabeled "explains in part why the crude ignited so quickly once the train cars were breached," the Transportation Safety Board statement said.

Officials said it's unclear why the crude oil was mislabeled but pointed to inconsistencies in the way North Dakota suppliers and shippers classify hazardous products, according to The Globe and Mail.

<snip>

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lac Megantic Train Was Carrying Mislabeled Oil, Officials Say (Original Post) cali Sep 2013 OP
At the time I stated.... HooptieWagon Sep 2013 #1
It's not clear to me if it was mislabled on the tanks, or on the accompanying paperwork. Brickbat Sep 2013 #2
Yay for industry self-regulation. haele Sep 2013 #3
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
1. At the time I stated....
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 02:16 PM
Sep 2013

that there was something more than crude oil...either there being an explosive petro-chemical in the tank cars, or that the train hit a gas source. No way that crude would explode.

haele

(12,659 posts)
3. Yay for industry self-regulation.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 02:29 PM
Sep 2013

Just let the companies take care of their own regulations, because of course, they want everything to run smoothly.
Why have independent checks and balances or other documents that create a trail of activity and responsibility? - that just makes paperwork drills, and we all know that gets in the way of productivity.
After all, the bottom line is at stake. Just Do It! That's the American Way.



I'm glad they found some evidence, and I'm truly shocked and sorry for the people of Lac Megantic. There is absolutly no reason that train operator should have been able to take the short-cuts that were taken that lead to the disaster - especially if the regulations were followed on both sides of the border.

Haele

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lac Megantic Train Was Ca...