General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWayback Machine, 2002: ABC: Erections Get Insurance; Why Not the Pill?
Erections Get Insurance; Why Not the Pill?
By GERALDINE SEALEY
June 19, 2002
Within weeks of hitting the U.S. market in 1998, more than half of Viagra prescriptions received health insurance coverage. If many women weren't already outraged that they had to pay for birth control out of pocket, they were infuriated at the preference given to the anti-impotence pills.
But the fury over Viagra may have given the fight for contraception covered under insurance plans just the momentum it needed. Women's groups say they're making significant progress in their battle to get reimbursed for birth control, even though insurers still argue that covering contraception will boost already skyrocketing health-care premiums.
This week, New York became the 20th state to require that insurers and employers provide contraceptive coverage. That means that half of U.S. women now live in states requiring at least some birth control coverage, according to Planned Parenthood. Massachusetts and Arizona passed similar bills earlier this year that will go into effect in 2003.
So far, women's groups have fought the battle piecemeal: state by state and insurer by insurer. But today, a congressional subcommittee is taking up a bill that would fill what women's groups say is a gaping hole in birth control coverage by requiring plans that fall under federal law to reimburse for contraception.
more...
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91538
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)It'll be interesting to see if you'll be told that you have an apples-to-oranges argument here.
firehorse
(755 posts)is on it just to stop birth from happening. This whole anti women's health care is an outrage.
saras
(6,670 posts)countryjake
(8,554 posts)Thank you for the reminder!