General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre You A Journalist? If You Say You Are, You Are...but...
Self-identification only goes so far. Getting others to agree with your self-declared status is a different thing.
Maybe you have a blog on some topic. You may consider yourself a journalist, but getting into the press room at a trade show or conference may not be so easy. Every such event has rules for admission as media. Unless your blog is a prominent one in that particular field, you're unlikely to get a press pass for the event. Space is limited, and the people paying to be there want to talk to journalists who might write about them in a publication with a wide circulation. They don't really want to talk to people with blogs that get 100 visits a day.
You may write frequently on some website, but that also may not qualify you for status as a journalist, either, depending on the website, what you write there, and on the requirements of whatever organization or person you encounter. Often, you won't qualify for the benefits accruing to journalists in that area. If your journalism is done on discussion forums, rather than on recognized news websites, it's unlikely that you'll be recognized as a journalist.
You may want to get a press pass from your local authorities that allows you past police lines, etc. Unless you write for a recognized publication, either locally or on a broader basis, you're going to have difficulty getting those credentials. Every jurisdiction has its own criteria for issuing press credentials, and you have to meet those criteria to get that press pass. Law enforcement and government agencies have press relations staffs, and they're not interested in repeating themselves to self-styled journalists who don't write for recognized media outlets, either local, regional, or on a larger scale. No press pass; no access.
Membership in some organization of journalists can help establish your identity as a journalist, but most such organizations have their own criteria for membership. If you don't meet those criteria, you won't be considered a journalist by that organization, and won't be given membership. Journalism organizations come in a variety of forms, and some are widely recognized. Others, that admit anyone who claims to be a journalist, are recognized for what they are, as well.
Bottom line is that anyone can call himself or herself a journalist. Anyone can do that. You can have business cards or some generic press pass printed from some website. But, getting others to recognize that identification is the real issue, and it's the critical issue for things like access, protection of sources, and more. For most bloggers and website writers, along with people who don't deal with collecting hard news, those issues are rarely pertinent, anyhow. You may see yourself as a journalist but, if nobody else recognizes that status, it's hard to maintain the illusion.
So, if you think you are a journalist, then you are a journalist. But, don't expect everyone else to recognize that status, automatically. They won't, necessarily. And journalists who do journalism as a paid profession are unlikely to recognize you as being in their profession. They make their living as journalists, and don't have time to validate your own opinion of your status.
N.B. - I used to work as a journalist. My career spans 3 decades. I'm not doing that any more. Today, I'm not a journalist, but I was a journalist. Now, I'm just a writer.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)is a degree in journalism.
MineralMan
(146,324 posts)And yet, I worked for 30 years as a magazine journalist, for a fairly broad range of publications. A journalism degree isn't really a requirement. Adherence to some sort of journalistic standards it, though. And those standards vary, depending on the type of journalism one does.
Oddly enough, nobody ever asked me what my degree was based on. They all seemed more interested in what I wrote and how I did that writing. Lots of English majors in journalism careers.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)It's not just standards and practices. It's learning how to manage the medium, history, and the cultural associations that surround it.
There's a big difference between someone with an English degree writing with a particular objective and a plumber with a Blogger account.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)I worked as a newspaper reporter for 25 years. Then spent 7 years writing about energy efficiency, cogeneration, indoor air quality, etc. for various trade publications and websites. Unemployed for the past 4 years, 11 months.
cali
(114,904 posts)are you actually going to claim he wasn't a journalist?
rrneck
(17,671 posts)For every Peter Jennings there are a million Glenn Becks. Or worse.
Uncle Joe
(58,389 posts)but in regard to the U.S. corporate media, if ethics was involved, too much of it didn't take.
So while recognition is nice, it's not the end all.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mahatma_Gandhi
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
Thanks for the thread, MineralMan.
MineralMan
(146,324 posts)There are some standards, but those are generally set by the publications. Some publications have very high ethical standards. Others, not so much. The ones I worked for all had very high standards, and those standards were in the contracts I signed. Beyond those, I had my own standards, which I followed, regardless of what the publication's standards were.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Here is the important point, which the corporate brigade keeps trying to obscure:
[font size=3]The government has no business passing laws giving itself the power to determine who is or isn't a journalist entitled to First Amendment protections.[/font size]
It is an assault on the First Amendment of the Constitution, and an abuse of power by government.
MineralMan
(146,324 posts)First Amendment protections. Not everyone is a journalist. My post is not about the First Amendment at all. You must be thinking of some other post.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_amendment
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)that you were a journalist who wound up writing that anti gay shite on all of those Right Wing websites. Just does not add up.
MineralMan
(146,324 posts)whether you buy it or not. Your comment has nothing to do with what I posted.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Are they journalists? Because they have the right, won in court to lie to the public in mass media. If that's a journalist, anyone is a journalist.