General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYour Internet’s in Danger
from In These Times:
Your Internets in Danger
Verizon v. FCC could lead to one Internet for the haves and another for the have-nots.
BY COLE STANGLER
A major court case pitting Verizon against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) could determine the future of Internet access in 21st-century America.
Though its uncertain how exactly the results of the case could emerge in the context of everyday Internet use, the stakes of Verizon v. FCC, which opened at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit earlier this month, are monumental. Until now, the Internet has been transformative because nobody has had to pay to get online in order to be heard, Jennifer Yeh, policy counsel at the media reform group Free Press, told reporters in a conference call about the the case. Critics say that if the court sides with Verizon, it could ultimately enable the construction of a multi-tiered Internet landscape resembling something like cable televisionwhere wealthy conglomerates have access to a mass consumer base and other providers, such as independent media, struggle to reach an audience.
Under the current order, which Verizon is challenging, the FCC has the right to bar Internet service providers (ISPs) from charging different prices to users based on what sites they access or to websites who might be willing to pay extra in order to offer faster speeds than their competitors.
By contrast, the ISPs want the authority to control Internet access on their own termsto block or slow content as they please and to charge what they want. ......................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://inthesetimes.com/article/15689/your_internets_in_danger/
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)If providers get what they want this could be VERY big...
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)rule without any controls, we dont have a chance. This is just one area of control the 1% will have over us. Another area we need to fight for is free and fair elections.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)they will own our Internet soon.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)thing and every service. A subservient under culture so they can get their boots licked. Thanks for the heads up.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)Free thought on the Internet is destroyed. Want to go on the Internet? Visit one of the 30 domains that are allowed by your ISP.
Democratic Underground? - banned for your ISP. Visit Huffington Post instead through our Deluxe Package (only an extra $59.99 per year added to our base Internet cost).
You Tube? Same thing. Use a different video sharing site? Too bad! We colluded with Google and banned them all for this ISP! Okay, fine, we'll allow Hulu, but you have to pay them too!
Want to buy stuff? It's Amazon.com or the highway, champ! Did we also mention that, feeling emboldened by their new found monopoly, Amazon jacked up their prices? No really, we hate Capitalism and always have. You guys just didn't notice as much before.
Want to make your own website? Well, are you a mega corporation? If not, then don't even ask - we'll laugh in your face! Don't even try to sell your crap if you aren't Walmart.com.
Have some extreme (non-lemming-like) opinions you want to share like you used to be able to? We don't like those either. You see, governments really don't like that. They'd rather just have us censor you instead. If nobody sees your opinion, they can just pretend everybody loves them. You understand...
But we have to do this, you see. 2 pedophile network sites exist somewhere, and Al Qaeda uses the Internet too! You wouldn't want Al Qaeda to win, would you? Surely that would be stupid, you know, compared to giving blood-sucking, competition-free, money-hungry, morally bankrupt ISP's even more power to fuck people over!
(Hyperbole)
Scuba
(53,475 posts)hunter
(38,312 posts)... paying special attention to those areas now ignored by the big commercial banks and internet providers.
There have been many similar projects in U.S.A. history, for example rural electrification and the interstate highway system, and we sure as hell have the labor available; there are plenty of people seeking interesting well paid work.
alfredo
(60,071 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)Wheeler who is "a former top lobbyist for the cable and wireless industries"
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)but maybe like the fda looks like it is protecting citizens not pharmas or food corps
I really do not know
although fcc had issue$ under Powell's son
I remember that vaguely
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)Websites have a right to charge if they want.
The companies who provide the phone lines ... I mean internet lines can't be allowed to charge or filter per site on top of that.
If they do then telephone lines might be managed the same way.
The company would decide who you could and couldn't call.
Talk about big brother, geez.
Instead of this they need to eliminate the cable TV model and set that up the way the internet is now.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)and using it to rape the rest of the others.
You do realize that if wealth was based on what you yourself created, the current ultra rich would frequent guests at the local soup kitchen.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Having one thing our corporate overlords couldn't control, that is.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Sentath
(2,243 posts)This is scary.
Nimyth
(34 posts)pretty much have a strangle hold on media/journalism. The internet is the last source of news (you have to hunt for it but it is at least available) not just talking-points/propaganda. These guys have been around for a long time and are a good internet rights resource https://www.eff.org/. Have list of several other for anyone interested in taking some action
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Nothing else even comes close.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,362 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Response to marmar (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed