Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 10:14 AM Oct 2013

Why Should Stage Hands At Carnegie Hall Make $400,000?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2013/10/04/why-should-stage-hands-at-carnegie-hall-make-400000/

Surprising to see something even halfway positive like this from Forbes.

Maybe the real question should be, why shouldn’t they? Carnegie Hall isn’t a branch of government. It’s a private non-profit largely supported by donor dollars from wealthy patrons. Sanford Weill, former CEO and chairman of Citigroup, is the organization’s chairman and donated a substantial sum to renovate its chamber music theater. The carpenters and electricians at Carnegie Hall do highly specialized work and log plenty of hours of overtime.

The stagehands’ big salaries made headlines this week after members of their union, Local One of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE) staged a strike, with a huge blow-up rubber rat in front of the hall and picketers who derailed the venue’s season-opening concert by The Philadelphia Orchestra with superstar violinist Joshua Bell and singer and bass player Esperanza Spalding. Today the union and management reached a deal that put an end to the three-day strike. But not before a lot of negative press for the union.

...

At Carnegie Hall, the dispute was over a 24-room educational wing set to open in 2014. Management had not wanted the stagehands to work there. In the deal reached today, students will be able to move their own music stands, chairs and instruments but when it comes to large instruments like drums or marimbas, the stagehands will get involved. According to a report by classical music station WQXR, management agreed to hire one additional full-time stagehand to work in the education wing.

Though the stagehands’ salaries seem high, it’s tough to argue that any business, including Carnegie Hall, is powerless when it comes to negotiating with unions these days. Besides, as Cornell professor Ileen DeVault points out, most of us don’t begrudge the huge salaries of unionized NFL and Major League Baseball players At the risk of inviting angry comments from Forbes readers, I’d say that Local One’s members have achieved the American dream, working their way through the echelons of the middle class to a level on par with Carnegie Hall’s wealthy donors. Is that such a terrible thing?


Side note: the carpenters used that inflatable rat a lot in DC when they were picketing AFL/CIO (long story). How many of those are there out there?
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Should Stage Hands At Carnegie Hall Make $400,000? (Original Post) Recursion Oct 2013 OP
CWA has used a rat like that one. Lasher Oct 2013 #1
if they really are makiing that much money, I say yayyy for them--at least they are doing something niyad Oct 2013 #2
Why does no one complain of the performers playing their making MILLIONS? Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #3
You need to read the post, not just the subject line (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #15
why is susan adams paid what she is paid? leftyohiolib Oct 2013 #4
A better question is why is Carnegie Hall tax exempt? n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #5
I have a lot of friends in that union who are happy to be back. JaneyVee Oct 2013 #6
Any wage that a union member gets is negotiated. Management has agreed to it. If management doesn't Brickbat Oct 2013 #7
Right, because contrary to the standard union bashing, businesses and organizations won't pay Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #9
THAT's why every working person should be in a UNION. Octafish Oct 2013 #8
As I told the story before... Chan790 Oct 2013 #11
Wasn't that the essence of the AFL-CIO / SEIU split? Recursion Oct 2013 #16
Even SEIU didn't call me back. n/t Chan790 Oct 2013 #19
The bigger question is seveneyes Oct 2013 #10
And an even bigger question is...... BronxBoy Oct 2013 #13
If there were no unions involved, then the stagehands making 400K would be "the rich", hughee99 Oct 2013 #14
I was a member of the local stagehand's union in the late '70s Holly_Hobby Oct 2013 #12
I wonder if the people that make those rats are unionized. DireStrike Oct 2013 #17
That's Scabby the Rat, the answer is yes and here is his story... Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #22
Thanks for the article! DireStrike Oct 2013 #23
iatse MEMBERS ONLY GET PAID WHEN THEY WORK elehhhhna Oct 2013 #18
Why should the top ten employees at a food bank make over $200,000 each? Agony Oct 2013 #20
They weren't striking for higher wages but for more positions in an expansion of Carnigie Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #21

niyad

(113,595 posts)
2. if they really are makiing that much money, I say yayyy for them--at least they are doing something
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 10:24 AM
Oct 2013

useful, as opposed to the corporate whoremasters, the lobbyists, and the elected clowns destroying this country.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
7. Any wage that a union member gets is negotiated. Management has agreed to it. If management doesn't
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 11:05 AM
Oct 2013

have a problem paying it, why should I?

(There are exceptions, such as arbitration, etc.)

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
9. Right, because contrary to the standard union bashing, businesses and organizations won't pay
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 11:11 AM
Oct 2013

unless they have to do so.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
8. THAT's why every working person should be in a UNION.
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 11:06 AM
Oct 2013

Either that, or socialize the financial, energy and defense industries*. THEN things will be more just.

* Meaning cut a check from the profits for all.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
11. As I told the story before...
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 11:16 AM
Oct 2013

when I tried to unionize the bank I used to work for, I got as much resistance from the bank (expected) as I got lack-of-interest-or-support from any union. (Not expected at all.)

I contacted several that I thought might be able and willing to help...you'd think they'd want to organize and represent bank tellers and financial service reps. (If for no reason other than numbers and there being a vast pool of wealth there to gain for members in the form of better wages and benefits which would boost the union's power substantially.)

Apparently not, I got a lot of "that's not really our area." I've talked to other people who were in similar boats...pretty much nobody in organized labor leadership has any interest in organizing any service workers or white-collar workers, with the occasional exception of restaurant kitchen workers in large cities.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
16. Wasn't that the essence of the AFL-CIO / SEIU split?
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 12:14 PM
Oct 2013

SEIU wanted to organize new industries and AFL didn't?

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
10. The bigger question is
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 11:14 AM
Oct 2013

If there were no unions involved in this case and stage hands were making half a million bucks would their pay be questioned?

BronxBoy

(2,286 posts)
13. And an even bigger question is......
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 11:42 AM
Oct 2013

If we aren't going to question and demean the salaries of CEOs, Bankers, Wall Street Execs and Emergency Managers, why shit on these guys who, you know, actually do some work?

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
14. If there were no unions involved, then the stagehands making 400K would be "the rich",
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 11:57 AM
Oct 2013

instead of "the workers".

Holly_Hobby

(3,033 posts)
12. I was a member of the local stagehand's union in the late '70s
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 11:36 AM
Oct 2013

At that time, I was making $28/hour working in the wardrobe area, ironing white shirts for the Spanish ballet company. My dad and brother were members also, my dad was the head carpenter, all of us making the same wage.

I always worked in wardrobe, being female, and made the same as the men. The only equal employment I've ever had. It was only part-time, when a show happened to be in town, which was about once a month. I usually worked one show M-F, 3 on Sat and 2 on Sun. I made a killing.

Those days are over here. They make about $10/hour now.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
18. iatse MEMBERS ONLY GET PAID WHEN THEY WORK
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 01:33 PM
Oct 2013

AND THEY often WORK 24/7 when THEY WORK - THEY should make SERIOUS MONEY when THEY WORK.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
20. Why should the top ten employees at a food bank make over $200,000 each?
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 02:10 PM
Oct 2013

...as much as $430,000 actually. Lots of these kind of questions as economic inequality/injustice accelerates.

huge pdf page 135 --->http://990s.foundationcenter.org/990_pdf_archive/363/363673599/363673599_201206_990.pdf

from the FeedingAmerica IRS i990 for 2012. Each of these employees got in one year as much as FeedingAmerica sent to some state food banks.

am I the only one bothered by this level of inequality?

Cheers,
Agony

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
21. They weren't striking for higher wages but for more positions in an expansion of Carnigie
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 04:43 PM
Oct 2013

Hall, an expansion costing one quarter of a billion dollars. The Union had been in stalled talks with the Hall for 13 months. None of the people striking would get more pay, they'd just get more coworkers under that hard earned and highly funded Umbrella.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Should Stage Hands At...