Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Federal Spending Are We Better Off Without?
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/10/08/what-federal-spending-are-we-better-off-withoutWhat have we learned, seven months into sequestration and one week into a government shutdown?
The Pentagon Needed to Trim the Fat
Lawrence J. Korb, a former assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration, is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.
The Pentagons base budget (nonwar spending) nearly doubled in the decade after Sept. 11, 2001, allowing military and civilian leaders to avoid making tough choices or prioritizing capabilities. In the name of national security, they could have it all. This gusher of defense spending led to what Senator John McCain has called an unaddressed culture of waste and inefficiency. In fact, Senator McCain argues that this perception of inefficiency is one reason that sequestration occurred.
Third, sequestration has forced the Pentagon leadership to recognize that it must reform its acquisitions system, which Senator McCain notes has been successful, for the most part, in turning taxpayer dollars into weapons systems that are delivered late, flawed, and vastly over budget, if they are delivered at all. A prime example of this would be the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which has doubled in price and is a decade late.
The Benefits of Sequestration
Gretchen Hamel is the executive director of Public Notice.
But is the federal cupboard really bare? Consider a few of the more than 100 wasteful spending examples from a new online database of wasteful spending, Spendopedia:
With nearly $17 trillion in debt, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office warned last month that if we continued to run huge deficits and failed to address mandatory spending, our nation would face increased chances of a major fiscal crisis in coming years. Meanwhile, the Government Accountability Office reports that since 2011, only 12 percent of more than 300 efficiency recommendations have been implemented.
The Pentagon Needed to Trim the Fat
Lawrence J. Korb, a former assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration, is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.
The Pentagons base budget (nonwar spending) nearly doubled in the decade after Sept. 11, 2001, allowing military and civilian leaders to avoid making tough choices or prioritizing capabilities. In the name of national security, they could have it all. This gusher of defense spending led to what Senator John McCain has called an unaddressed culture of waste and inefficiency. In fact, Senator McCain argues that this perception of inefficiency is one reason that sequestration occurred.
Third, sequestration has forced the Pentagon leadership to recognize that it must reform its acquisitions system, which Senator McCain notes has been successful, for the most part, in turning taxpayer dollars into weapons systems that are delivered late, flawed, and vastly over budget, if they are delivered at all. A prime example of this would be the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which has doubled in price and is a decade late.
The Benefits of Sequestration
Gretchen Hamel is the executive director of Public Notice.
But is the federal cupboard really bare? Consider a few of the more than 100 wasteful spending examples from a new online database of wasteful spending, Spendopedia:
· $34 million for a 64,000-square-foot building in Afghanistan that the military will not use
· $436 million for upgrading tanks the U.S. Army says it does not need
· $1.7 billion annually for vacant government office buildings
With nearly $17 trillion in debt, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office warned last month that if we continued to run huge deficits and failed to address mandatory spending, our nation would face increased chances of a major fiscal crisis in coming years. Meanwhile, the Government Accountability Office reports that since 2011, only 12 percent of more than 300 efficiency recommendations have been implemented.
More interesting stuff at the link.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 539 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Federal Spending Are We Better Off Without? (Original Post)
Scuba
Oct 2013
OP
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)1. Republican pay checks?
Myrina
(12,296 posts)2. Subsidies for Oil companies and Wall Street ...
... for starters. Then military contracting. Then overseas military shit like you mention in your OP.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)3. NSA Sec. 215 and 702 programs.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)4. at least 50% of the security state budget can be cut for a start.
That would save us something like 500B/yr.