Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
Sun Oct 13, 2013, 01:33 PM Oct 2013

Historically feeble SS COLA gives Republicons cause to celebrate

RepubbliBaggers are just creaming themselves as they realize that America's honorable veterans and elders will be getting chickenshit this coming year, as the Republicon plan to TOSS elders & veterans UNDER THE FRIKKEN BUS takes another step toward ugly reality.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- For the second straight year, millions of Social Security recipients, disabled veterans and federal retirees can expect historically small increases in their benefits come January.

Preliminary figures suggest a benefit increase of roughly 1.5 percent...

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/social-security-raise-among-lowest-122727187.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Historically feeble SS COLA gives Republicons cause to celebrate (Original Post) Berlum Oct 2013 OP
Goddammit!!!!! Democrats could WIN if they'd run on this! LongTomH Oct 2013 #1
Here is the list of historical Social Security COLAs.... PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #2
10 year average = 2.5% COLA (2003 - 2012) pinto Oct 2013 #4
CPI-W vs CPI-E pinto Oct 2013 #3
Lift the ceiling ! Berlum Oct 2013 #5

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
1. Goddammit!!!!! Democrats could WIN if they'd run on this!
Sun Oct 13, 2013, 01:37 PM
Oct 2013

No Social Security or Veterans benefits cuts!

We could sweep the pukes right out of Congress!!!!!

pinto

(106,886 posts)
4. 10 year average = 2.5% COLA (2003 - 2012)
Sun Oct 13, 2013, 01:56 PM
Oct 2013

Year COLA

2003 2.1
2004 2.7
2005 4.1
2006 3.3
2007 2.3
2008 5.8
2009 0.0
2010 0.0
2011 3.6
2012 1.7

pinto

(106,886 posts)
3. CPI-W vs CPI-E
Sun Oct 13, 2013, 01:50 PM
Oct 2013

CPI for the Elderly (CPI-E)[edit]

Since at least 1982, the BLS has also computed a consumer price index for the elderly to account for the fact that the consumption patterns of seniors are different from those of younger people. For the BLS, "elderly" means that the reference person or a spouse is at least 62 years of age; approximately 24 percent of all consumer units meet this definition. Individuals in this group consume roughly double the amount of medical care as all consumers in CPI-U or employees in CPI-W.[4]

In January of each year, Social Security recipients receive a cost of living adjustment (COLA) "to ensure that the purchasing power of Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits is not eroded by inflation. It is based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W)".[5]

However, from December 1982 through December 2011, the all-items CPI-E rose at an annual average rate of 3.1 percent, compared with increases of 2.9 percent for both the CPI-U and CPI-W.[4] This suggests that the elderly have been losing purchasing power at the rate of roughly 0.2 (=3.1-2.9) percentage points per year.

In 2003 Hobijn and Lagakos estimated that the social security trust fund would run out of money in 40 years using CPI-W and in 35 years using CPI-E.[6]

Robert Reich, former United States Secretary of Labor, says there is an easy fix to the concern that the Social Security trust fund could run out of money: Just lift the ceiling on income subject to Social Security taxes, which is now $113,700.[7]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Consumer_Price_Index#CPI_for_Urban_Wage_Earners_and_Clerical_Workers_.28CPI-W.29

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Historically feeble SS CO...