General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo many are yelling, "Sedition!"
But the President is steadily, patiently carrying on the job of governing. Does that make him naïve? Are the people calling for -- whatever it is they're calling for -- naïve? Is he complicit? Are they just engaged in melodramatic hyperbole?
daleanime
(17,796 posts)that they are honestly expressing their feelings is out of the question?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)If it were actual sedition the President, as president, would be obligated to confront it.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)By book, it is sedition, and thus illegal what GOP is doing.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)That's quite the assumption.
tritsofme
(17,399 posts)As to the OP, I hope it is just hyperbole, and not breathtaking ignorance.
BluegrassStateBlues
(881 posts)Sometimes it's up to the public to say the things the President cannot.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)If President Obama is unmoved by the things others are saying doesn't that make the charge suspect?
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)tea party
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)...right?
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Given some of the rhetoric recently...
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)if this was reversed and the fucking republicans had to deal with this shit.
StrayKat
(570 posts)I think the far right is crying for sedition because they have no other cards to play. It's silly, and Pres Obama is right to ignore it.
I find the cries of sedition from the left more disturbing. They're an equally smug and unhelpful display of bigotry that show an intolerance that the left is supposed to be combating. They alienate Southerners, those with relatives or ties there, those who may be moderate or 'lite' democrats, etc. Fighting fire with fire is one thing, but what's the point of fighting stupid with stupid?