General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGloria Steinem Speaks Out About Miley Cyrus, Ends The Debate Forever
Last edited Mon Oct 14, 2013, 11:35 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/14/gloria-steinem-miley-cyrus_n_4097006.html
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)If Miley had talent she could just sing.
KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)and someone is willing to pay her a bunch of money to do it. She doesn't hurt anyone taking money to go out there and wiggle around.
I've never understood why using one body part to make a living is OK but using a different one is not.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)People LOVE to tear down anyone famous. That's the downside of celebrity In regards to Miley, she's not famous for any talent, she's famous for being famous, and now apparently feels that the only way to retain that fame is to do ridiculous things. She is the Sarah Palin of pop music.
2naSalit
(86,636 posts)KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)Sarah Palin helped get Gabby Giffords shot and is part of the gang helping to hurt an awful lot of Americans with this shutdown.
I have no particular feeling for Miley one way or the other but I figure she's a young woman ( a kid to me) not hurting anyone with her antics. Maybe down the road she'll use the riches to do something worthwhile and maybe she won't - that remains to be seen.
As for people love to tear down celebrity - yes I agree 100% on that. We humans are a petty bunch sometimes.
merrily
(45,251 posts)(As opposed to only putting on the suit.)
mopinko
(70,112 posts)that was the point all along.
Response to Demo_Chris (Reply #1)
agent46 This message was self-deleted by its author.
jzola
(158 posts)was noticed first. She was a Playboy bunny---and then wrote about it.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)and last I checked, she does so while fully clothed and not rubbing one out on stage. That's just one example.
But I do appreciate the point re: scholarship money and goofy pageants.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers. It's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)progressoid
(49,991 posts)WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)I hadn't seen that, thanks!
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)and intellect. She made a name for herself, and she was a hero for women's rights.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)adult. She's part of the problem and will continue to be as long as she is just tits and ass with legs. Put your tongue back in your mouth.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I am bothered that a young woman of twenty believes that "growing up" is writhing on the floor with her tongue out and swinging naked from a giant metal ball and licking a hammer provocatively.
Seriously.
My 12- and 13-year old daughters think Miley is a flake. They are more mature and sensible than she is.
Miley had plenty of choices. If she wanted to be famous, there were many roads she could have taken. Rubbing her crotch with a foam finger and simulating sex on stage weren't her only choices.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)i don't think its an age thing either. Hugs, honey. your daughters sound wonderful.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Show biz is not the only game in town, and making a fool of yourself isn't the only way to make it. You of all people should get that.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)these women CHOOSE to participate in this sexist garbage - WTF
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I don't see MS speaking out about how the game is rigged and working to change them. She seems to have too much fun with the attention she has drawn.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Sinead O'Connor and Gloria Steinem are merely playing into the publicity game that Miley and her record label executives have created. Readers will be reminded that Miley has released an album, and they'll go watch Wrecking Ball, and they'll buy the album.
The people who listen to Miley Cyrus don't know or care who Steinem is. But they keep the Miley publicity blitz going, making her considerable $150m fortune grow even larger.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Look at her childhood. She is so in need of attention that, like a little kid, will seek out that attention by any means necessary. She needs this attention for her own survival. I hope she gets the help she needs.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Couldn't resist.
(Rider exits thread)
Dr. Strange
(25,921 posts)Adele didn't seem to need it. She relied on actual talent. Maybe Miley (and others) could try playing that game?
leftstreet
(36,108 posts)That just seems like a dumb statement, and an insult to famous women from Catherine the Great to Katherine Hepburn
JI7
(89,250 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Rebellious Republican
(5,029 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)... Miley's a kid. It's her life and career to screw up as she likes. My only hope is that she has enough sense to not wipe out on drugs and alcohol. We are such a judgmental prudish society.
merrily
(45,251 posts)That comment might be fine in the context of someone who gained fame as a singer or an actress after appearing nude somewhere, but that is not Miley's bio.
On the other hand, I have no problem with the nudity. Maybe I did not see the full video, but I saw less than I would have seen on a woman wearing a thong bikini.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)However, she had a completely different image as a Disney child star who's fanbase was primarily 12 and under. (My now 12 and 13 year old cousins went through a Hannah Montana phase and had their room plastered with Miley Cyrus posters).
I guess my beef with the nudity/sexuality is due to the age of many of her Hannah Montana fans.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)I have no problem with Miley at all - I actually like her new music and her personality. She is a rebellious 20 year old - imagine that. She owes no allegiance to her Hannah Montana fans - its been over two years since it was filmed - she played a character it had no bases in reality.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)Dr. Lisa Wade's take on this...
http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/10/14/my-two-cents-on-feminism-and-miley-cyrus/
Response to PasadenaTrudy (Reply #26)
seaglass This message was self-deleted by its author.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)As long as women continue the play the GAME, the GAME will continue. We are ALL responsible for changing the culture if we do not like it. No pass for Miley.
I reject the GAME wholesale. Just no. My sexuality is not a commodity. I don't want any advantages if that is the path to achieving them.
Kurska
(5,739 posts)It'd be entirely wrong for anyone to tell you what to do with your sexuality against your wishes. Yet, Miley Cyrus clearly desires to treat her sexuality as a commodity. I don't understand why a person would demand no one tell them what to do with their sexuality, yet imply that someone else is wrong for using their sexuality how they see fit.
It comes off as double standard to me. "I do what I want with what I got and you also get to do what I want with what you got" seems rather unfair to me.
Personally, I think it is her body and she could sell it spare parts if she really wanted to. It ain't my body, it ain't my call.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Seriously? This woman who had a career handed to her, who had backing from the mighty Disney, was famous all over the world before she was 20 years old. She had to take her clothes off to be noticed?
Bullshit.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 12, 2014, 04:24 PM - Edit history (8)
Miley Cyrus...had a career handed to her...had backing from the mighty Disney, was famous all over the world before she was 20 years old...Miley was neither "discovered" nor plucked out of a casting call for Hannah Montana -- thanks to her famous father, she got to start at the top. Her "game plan" appears to be taking control of her career by"de-Disney-fying" her girlhood image now that she's "of age." That would certainly explain her VMA performance and gratuitous nudity. But hopefully she's noticed the fate of those who have boarded what I call "the Madonna Express."
The downside of being a headline-grabbing "sensation" rather than an actual, credible artist is that sensations wear off -- and so quickly that your survival relies on reinventing your style rather than your substance. You have to become more famous for dresses made of meat, bras made of cupcakes, blue hair, beating up photographers, going into rehab, and four-star production videos than for anything you sing. When Madonna got too stale, she was replaced by Britney (also a Disney product), who begat Gaga, who begat Niki Minaj, and so on.
Miley has decided to ride the Madonna Express -- and I hope it's just for some quick paychecks, because she's put herself on track for an inevitable collision with oblivion.
rocktivity
Taverner
(55,476 posts)rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:26 PM - Edit history (5)
when opportunities for, and images of, women in magazines were limited to homemakers, star-struck teenyboppers and nude centerfolds. YOU said "No" to "playing the game," and as a result, you changed the culture -- VERY much for the better!
rocktivity
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)and it was my bible during the '70s.
dawg
(10,624 posts)than Georgia's HOPE scholarships, that cover tuition for in-state colleges for women (and men) with B averages or better.
Kurska
(5,739 posts)I assume she is talking about scholarships, EXCLUSIVELY for women.
what stats she's using, but I would bet big time money that if you added up all scholarships for women's sports (and maybe just basketball or soccer by itself) you would dwarf that available for Miss America.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Most of them are for $3000. It seems unlikely that these represent the majority of scholarships available to women. Maybe it is the largest number of scholarships by a single organization, rather than the most dollars?
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Really? So because the Miss America pageant exists, that justifies whatever ridiculous things someone else does? In what universe does that make any sense?
But since Gloria specifically raised the point of college in defending her, why hasn't Mylie spent any of her wealth on sending herself to college? Surely she can afford it without a scholarship. So what is the point being made here, exactly?
All I see is someone I once thought something of, Steinem, proving that she actually has no substance or values. Sucking up to a kid, that's pretty cheap.
I agree we need to change the culture, but not for the reason Steinem says... but because it gives the biggest rewards to lowest common denominator crap like what Cyrus has been promoting lately.
TBF
(32,062 posts)We play the same games with economics. I watch folks sit around and wax poetic about dream candidates and 3rd parties while the elephant in the room - capitalism - is never seriously addressed. If you are not "winning" via capitalism it is because you individually are doing something wrong. Same thing here. A focus on individuality and blaming the victim, when society as a whole needs to be examined. Why are we not questioning the men involved in selling sex - why are we piling on Miley? Sexism and blaming the victim rather than addressing how we treat women in our society.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)So she's doing what entertainers do, entertaining... At least, for the people who like that sort of thing.
What I think some people don't get is, when we 40, 50, 60 year-olds complain about the music of teens and 20somethings, for some odd reason it doesn't make that stuff any less popular.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)and I imagine I'll be doing so when I'm 80.
This isn't a "get off my lawn" thing.
[URL=http://www.sherv.net/emoticons.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)That's good, so Peter Buck's daughters will have something to listen to while they're away at school.
Anyway, I like to imagine I'm relevant, too... even as my kids moan and groan through all the 35 minute Dark Stars from 1972 played in the car on road trips. ("You just don't appreciate it, man!"
Still, the parameters of the argument- "Miley has sex and drugs in her music! She dances lasciviously! She co-opts African American culture! She horrifies the parental units!" ...okay, if that's not a GOML thing, it certainly follows a well-established rock and roll script.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)I understand the script and pushing boundaries. But I don't follow Gloria Steinem telling us that Miley is "playing the only game that exists." It's simply not true. And young women need to know that.
(I'm with your kids on Dark Star. And Homer Simpson on Shakedown Street: "I've been listening to this song for 3 days and it's only the end of the first verse!"
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I agree with all you say, here.
Miley's in showbiz; and there are lots of ways to play even that game. The artists I like (ahem) have valued integrity and honesty and pluckiness and cough cough yes yes tenure over flash-in-the-panittyness.
I just don't totally grok why some people seem so "mad" at her. She didn't go out there and say "drop out of grad school, learn to stick your tongue out so far you can lick your own ear" (a phenomenally UN-sexy move, in my book, but what do I know) ... she set out to shock the squares and succeeded with an almost mathematical precision.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)but seems to be the only game SOME know how to play... ffs...
sP
chervilant
(8,267 posts)Too bad she's so "irrelevant"!
Response to kpete (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)Response to gopiscrap (Reply #56)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)I think Sinead O'Connor nailed it that Miley is making a conscious decision to play by those rules, but she isn't forced to do so. She wants to.
A musician with her clebrity and name recognition could take a stand and publicly speak out (as lesser selling acts like Grimes did) and she could be a real influence. Instead, she chose to respond to O'Connor by attacking her battle with mental illness.
Yes, the record industry promotes this oversexualization and objectification.
But Miley Cyrus, Britney and the rest of them get off on it and try to defend what they're doing as some sort of feminism. I think Madonna started this trend of doing whatvever it takes to sell records, and then try to pass it off as a sign of strength.
And there are plenty of musicians who make it without degrading themselves. There was a whole tour of them a decade ago with Lillith Fair, women like Bjork, PJ Harvey and Florence Welch sell records without doing strip club act on MTV.
Sure, they don't sell as much as the poptarts do. But they chose not to play the game. Miley does, and she deserves flack for it.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I'm amazed at the lack of background knowledge.
mopinko
(70,112 posts)for an assignment.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)mopinko
(70,112 posts)using her tits was not what furthered her career. telling the truth about women who got paid to flash their tits is different than living off your tits.
good or ill. it is different.