Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 12:50 AM Oct 2013

Jerry Brown signs bill creating two tiered tuition, one without any state support

As the Republicans are desperately trying to commit political suicide in Washington, Democrats in California are trying desperately to keep destructive conservatives ideas alive.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) - Gov. Jerry Brown has signed a bill that would allow California's community colleges to offer additional courses at inflated prices during short summer and winter sessions.

***

The measure sponsored by Assem. Das Williams, D-Santa Barbara, would allow community colleges to make courses available between the traditional fall and spring semesters.

It does not provide additional state funding to pay for the extra classes. Instead, students would be charged the nonresident rate of $200 per unit, compared with $46 for state-subsidized credits during traditional semesters.

Several community college systems and student and faculty groups opposed the bill, saying it would put lower income students at a disadvantage.

http://www.news10.net/news/article/260136/2/Brown-signs-bill-for-pricier-community-college-classes
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

napi21

(45,806 posts)
2. Why? Why the inflated price?
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 12:59 AM
Oct 2013

I usually agree with what Jerry Brown does, but I don't understand why he's doing this. Can you enlighten me please?

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
5. they tried to do this at Santa Monica College where I teach. They wanted private contractors to
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 01:05 AM
Oct 2013

administer the higher priced classes, which makes no sense since the school is perfectly capable of collecting money.

In this state level bill, they dropped the contractor part.

It's a great deal for legislators: they can say they are providing access to college without raising taxes on their rich donors and big businesses.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
7. these aren't regular semesters
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 01:41 AM
Oct 2013

they are the short periods between the regular academic year.

it is probably to help the institutions help their budgets during the regular year, without depriving anybody.

i'm not against this because it's pretty much impossible to take more than one class during these short sessions and the regular faculty often aren't teaching then.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
15. the same people teach the bulk of all required classes--adjuncts who have to stitch together
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 11:39 AM
Oct 2013

multiple jobs to survive, like me.

So for the instructors, this is actually a short term plus--potentially more work to go around.

But most of us understand what a struggle it is financially for most middle and working class to get through college, which outweighs the slight personal gain for us.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
3. I'm not sure this is a bad thing.
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 01:00 AM
Oct 2013

Regular semester courses stay the same?
These are offered during inter session?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
8. the community colleges are perennially strapped
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 01:42 AM
Oct 2013

this money from intercession would probably help the regular session and regular students more than it would harm them.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
10. no. The big picture is it's a foot in the door to transfer the cost of college entirely to students
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 02:51 AM
Oct 2013

and their families rather than raising taxes on the wealthy.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
13. actually, the universities already do that during intersession
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 03:13 AM
Oct 2013

but they have never been allowed to do it during regular session.

JI7

(89,250 posts)
6. many kids take classes during short sessions and this would hurt lower income
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 01:30 AM
Oct 2013

students while those who are well off would have no problem.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
14. they are required for graduation. They want this for high demand classes first
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 11:36 AM
Oct 2013

that's the whole rationale--the tax base isn't big enough to offer more classes, so we make the students pay for the additional ones.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
16. But they're still going to be offering these high demand classes
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 02:44 PM
Oct 2013

in the spring and fall -- at the lower rate.

So the idea is that if some students want to pay a premium to take these classes in between the regular terms, then it will help to alleviate crowding in the regular, low-cost classes in the fall and spring.

Are you sure that's not worth experimenting with, as the governor put it?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jerry Brown signs bill cr...