General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am a slut.
There, I said it. Before I married my present husband, I had sex with whomever I pleased, as often as I pleased. In cars, and out. While I was a college student. When I traveled.
I have used almost every form of available birth control for both contraception and for medical needs. I had an abortion when my contraception failed.
I had so much sex that it would make Limbaugh's eyes pop out.
I still have all the sex I want, with my husband (he's OK with this).
I am not ashamed of my sexual history, but there are those who think I should be. I'd like to know why.
I also know that there are DUers who would prefer that I don't call myself a slut. But, I am a woman of lusty appetites, and I refuse to be ashamed, and I refuse to be quiet.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)but I have to report that I was never as successful as I wanted to be.
malthaussen
(17,200 posts)Queue up "Ain't Nobody's Business." The whole good girl/bad girl dilemma in our society has always baffled the shit out of me.
-- Mal
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Despite society's best efforts to shame me.
It also takes a special kind of partner to love a slut, and I am delighted to have found one. There were times in my youth when men (I am 90% hetero) would back away or visibly wilt when faced with a sexually assertive woman.
patrice
(47,992 posts)high school, that it was okay to use birth control pills.
I have kept that fact secret until just this week.
I can't speak for how many lovers my daughter has had, but I can say that she tends toward the serious/committed types of long relationships.
She has always displayed very motivated goal-driven behavior and, after several different stages of evolution through the public market place, now has her own very successful business in her home.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)I pre-empted the issue by having my daughter on the pill for her periods from early adolescence. I also beat into her tiny teenage skull that oral contraceptives don't protect you from diseases, so "no glove, no love."
She also knows that should an accident happen, she has my full support however she decides to proceed with the outcome.
I have found it much less exhausting to live in the real world.
patrice
(47,992 posts)about "being a slut", which I prefer to characterize as the awesome power of being a woman, I feared losing her to secrecy and fear and entering that whole crazy maze of deflection and avoidance, instead of sharing whatever she chose to share with me and having that experience as a mother of another woman.
What is needed is attentive appropriateness. My worst problem with her was that she wouldn't keep reasonable hours. Part of that was that she did everything and did it all very well, including successful socializing; since everything except "curfew" was working fine, I found no grounds to interfere with her. I'll always remember when she invited me to go to her soon-to-be university for parents' day. She had come through it all: sex, drugs, alcohol, and rock 'n' roll and when she got to university she was not one bit confused. I walked with her on parents' day; she knew exactly where she wanted to go, whom she wanted to talk to, what questions she was ready to ask, how to figure out everything about this new environment . . . . Not all young people are like this, but a significant number more of them could be if we'd let them know that it IS okay.
These are HER traits; I can't take credit for that much, some was me, some was her strong secure-male peaceful father, some my huge family where she lived around her peer cousins and adults like her parents, and some was certain ones of her teachers who encouraged her mind and validated her different -ness.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I consider that a honor and what a good relationship between mother and daughter should be. Hello? If I didn't use them as a "slut", or even as a MOTHER, how the hell would I know anything about them?
patrice
(47,992 posts)dictated by others (for their own agendas). What you should be to one another and how that, as you observes, HONORS, the persons involved, instead of a blind system that doesn't know or care about either one of you.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)about women and their sexuality.
These beliefs stem from religion - and from the concept of women as property within the cultures in which those religions were created.
patrice
(47,992 posts)to consider.
I think those traits have been over-simplified, and then socially reinforced, MUCH to our pain and loss.
uponit7771
(90,346 posts)lapislzi
(5,762 posts)He's just 110% lustworthy (I hope he's reading this...)
Withywindle
(9,988 posts)I have a similar background, and I also have no shame or regrets about it whatsoever. Why should anyone be ashamed of positive experiences that hurt no one?
I have no idea how much sex a woman is allowed to have before she crosses the "slut" line. There's probably a magical formula somewhere, in some people's minds. But it's all in their minds. I'm not interested in making space for that kind of bullshit in mine.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Or who doesn't have the decency to be ashamed.
Response to Withywindle (Reply #7)
Post removed
RainDog
(28,784 posts)malaise
(269,026 posts)but never in cars - I love comfort
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)I *think* that's when I gave it up...boyfriend had a Datsun 260ZX. You can't do much in one of those.
malaise
(269,026 posts)and were either employed or in college and definitely not in a car.
And no that car would have been a recipe for gymnastics
REP
(21,691 posts)I have the newer incarnation of the Fairlady Z - a coupe - and there's no hump space I have changed clothes in the back of a Karmann Ghia
(The 260ZX is also called S30)
Response to malaise (Reply #9)
Post removed
malaise
(269,026 posts)Bet on that
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)malaise
(269,026 posts)Hope Rush goes that way as well.
WildEyedLiberal
(12,799 posts)Well played
malaise
(269,026 posts)He disrupted
RainDog
(28,784 posts)via alternet
http://www.alternet.org/sex/154373/why_do_we_live_in_a_world_that%27s_petrified_of_women_who_love_sex/?page=entire
A woman who was once asked by a man, why, if the pleasure of cohabitation was equal for both sexes, it was generally the men who pursued and importuned the women rather than vice-versa, replied:
It is a very wise custom that compels the men to take the initiative. For it is certain that we women are always ready for sex; not so you men, however. And we should therefore be soliciting the men in vain, if they happened to be not in the proper condition for it.
...womens libidos went from being considered as powerful or more so than mens to being essentially erased. Pre-Renaissance examples of horny ladies abound, from the Greeks onward: make your own list, but do include Chaucer. Hes such fun. This change in attitudes appears to have been religiously motivated, and based on the idea that women are more spiritual and sacred than men, meaning less horny. Again, make your own list of contemporary leftovers of this attitude: there are plenty.
The writer notes that the same joke is now told, but the genders are reversed. The "less desiring of sex" stereotype, therefore, made female desire "abnormal."
The belief that "normal" women do not like sex and view hetero male sexual desire toward them as unwanted creates a rape culture mentality - i.e. women must be taken by force. If they are not, they are abnormal.
izquierdista
(11,689 posts)Have such a hard time with anagrams. Lemme see, L is for love, that's good; S is for sex, people get hung up about that. OK, I think I can remember now.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)I am lusty and dyslexic.
librechik
(30,674 posts)This is ONLY about power and sexism. You are NOT a slut, you are only accepting the right's widely broadcast term for women who do not adhere to their demands.
What is the (noticeably perverted) Rush to be called when he is obviously promiscuous?
Rich, successful and powerful, something women will never truly be in his cosmos.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)We vacation in Jamaica with other sluts.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)I don't think I'll ever get there (nor will my husband), but I have tremendous respect for poly.
Response to banned from Kos (Reply #15)
Post removed
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Go away and be celibate. And leave the rest of us out of your lunacy.
Oh and one thing. NO ONE, is asking ANYONE, to subsidize SHIT.
Unless you have been donating money to for profit insurance companies.
I realize you aren't too bright so I'll try to make this easy. You pay the Insurance Company. When you need a prescription you make your copay. You spend your money.
So explain where your money comes in when I pay my insurance and make my co-pay.
Or is it that you are angry that insurance companies actually have to insure and cover you?
samsingh
(17,599 posts)and more satisfied place !
lector
(95 posts)She is the best woman in the world for me. She keeps me young and taught me how to PLAY....
How lucky can one man be!
duhneece
(4,113 posts)I refuse shame. I own this word, now. But I don't want to hear any man use this word. Much like blacks who have taken back the 'n' word, owning it. Words that have been used to shame, to make us feel small....never again will a word be used to make me feel small about myself, especially my sexual self.
I'm a 61 year old slut and proud of it!
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)My life became so much less dramatic when I realized what I am and owned it.
quaker bill
(8,224 posts)I have had sex with two partners, and married them both (at different times) (sex both before and after marrying them).
99.9999% of the time we used birth control (until I got a vasectomy)
Twice we did not use BC and I have two lovely kids.
Since the vast majority of times the sex was just for fun, I must be a slut.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Yeah I had lots of sex during my college days (the 1970s) and I'm not ashamed of it. Nobody was manipulating me, and I wasn't manipulating anyone else as well.
I'm married and happily monogamous now.
I'm an old reformed tart.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)"Lots of brains, and I like sex!"
It's still true 30 years later.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Response to lapislzi (Original post)
Post removed
Response to lapislzi (Original post)
Post removed
malaise
(269,026 posts)Just go away!
REP
(21,691 posts)Awwwwww!!
RainDog
(28,784 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)... the stupid burns
RainDog
(28,784 posts)no one is asking you to subsidize a woman's sexual life.
insurance cos pay for this - just as they pay for other medicines. why don't you go try to sugar-shame diabetics for insulin?
Mopar151
(9,983 posts)It's ladies like you who give men (not crucified eunuchs) hope - that they may meet someone who plays "fun to have" rather than "hard to get".
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)HeiressofBickworth
(2,682 posts)from these anti-women people just sickens me.
If I have some medical need for a drug that is also called "birth control", I should be able to obtain it through insurance just like I get statins for my cholesterol. I don't have to account for the number of steaks I eat in a month in order to qualify for the statins. I don't think I should have to account for my sexual history or my current or future sexual activities in order to obtain a drug that is legal and prescribed by a doctor.
They are deliberately eliminating the real issue by claiming birth control pills are somehow related to the number of times a woman has sex. Not only is this a total error, but it trivializes the medical needs of women. Let's apply the same criteria for men's sex performance drugs. At least those drugs ARE related to the number of times men have sex.