Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:48 PM Oct 2013

The gated globe

FIVE YEARS AGO George W. Bush gathered the leaders of the largest rich and developing countries in Washington for the first summit of the G20. In the face of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, the leaders promised not to repeat that era’s descent into economic isolationism, proclaiming their commitment to an open global economy and the rejection of protectionism.

They succeeded only in part. Although they did not retreat into the extreme protectionism of the 1930s, the world economy has certainly become less open. After two decades in which people, capital and goods were moving ever more freely across borders, walls have been going up, albeit ones with gates. Governments increasingly pick and choose whom they trade with, what sort of capital they welcome and how much freedom they allow for doing business abroad.

Virtually all countries still embrace the principles of international trade and investment. They want to enjoy the benefits of globalisation, but as much as possible they now also want to insulate themselves from its downsides, be they volatile capital flows or surging imports.

Globalisation has clearly paused. A simple measure of trade intensity, world exports as a share of world GDP, rose steadily from 1986 to 2008 but has been flat since. Global capital flows, which in 2007 topped $11 trillion, amounted to barely a third of that figure last year. Cross-border direct investment is also well down on its 2007 peak.

...

The flow of people between countries is also being managed more carefully than before the crisis. Borders have not been closed to immigrants, but admission criteria have been tightened. At the same time, however, many countries have made entry easier for scarce highly skilled workers and for entrepreneurs.

...

A clear pattern is beginning to emerge: more state intervention in the flow of money and goods, more regionalisation of trade as countries gravitate towards like-minded neighbours, and more friction as national self-interest wins out over international co-operation. Together, all this amounts to a new, gated kind of globalisation.


http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21587384-forward-march-globalisation-has-paused-financial-crisis-giving-way
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The gated globe (Original Post) FarCenter Oct 2013 OP
The limits to growth pscot Oct 2013 #1
Ever since the 1997 Asian financial crisis, countries have been putting in firewalls FarCenter Oct 2013 #2
China's trade has been flat pscot Oct 2013 #3
Northeast Asia will be OK, since population growth has been controlled FarCenter Oct 2013 #4
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
2. Ever since the 1997 Asian financial crisis, countries have been putting in firewalls
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 11:01 PM
Oct 2013

And also building financial reserves to be able to weather a hiccup.

But you are right that it will become more difficult with a burgeoning population wanting higher living standards.

I'd expect real trouble soon in the semi-tropical belt from Morocco to New Guinea.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
3. China's trade has been flat
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 11:11 PM
Oct 2013

for the last couple of quarters. It's as if the system were running on fumes.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
4. Northeast Asia will be OK, since population growth has been controlled
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 11:25 PM
Oct 2013

The Indian subcontinent will degenerate into a huge wasteland of misery -- those parts that aren't already.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The gated globe