Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Next: Raise the cap on SS. nt (Original Post) grahamhgreen Oct 2013 OP
I like it. nt Ilsa Oct 2013 #1
Watching CNN, the push is to get the President to lead the budget negotiation. nenagh Oct 2013 #2
And this time really put it in AL Gore's lock box so that all Cleita Oct 2013 #3
I say eliminate the cap altogether. Laelth Oct 2013 #4
Yes. Beyond time to go after the rich. Dawgs Oct 2013 #5
Agreed. Laelth Oct 2013 #8
Even better. truebluegreen Oct 2013 #11
And raise minimum wage to $10.25. n/t Dawgs Oct 2013 #6
I'm shooting for $15.00/hr., but I'd settle for $10.25/hr., for the time being. n/t Laelth Oct 2013 #9
Using which House Speaker? n/t Orsino Oct 2013 #7
while Repubs work to eliminate SS rurallib Oct 2013 #10

nenagh

(1,925 posts)
2. Watching CNN, the push is to get the President to lead the budget negotiation.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 08:28 AM
Oct 2013

Their message seems to push the meme that only the President can successfully negotiate a budget deal.

Are the Republicans trying to maneuver Pres Obama into taking the blame if 'entitlement programs' are changed? and just prior to 2014 elections?

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
3. And this time really put it in AL Gore's lock box so that all
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 08:32 AM
Oct 2013

this talk about chained CPIs and other assaults on what is the only retirement security a majority of seniors have goes away.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
4. I say eliminate the cap altogether.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 08:42 AM
Oct 2013

Those who derive the most benefit from this society should pay the most for its maintenance.

-Laelth

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
8. Agreed.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 09:15 AM
Oct 2013

Even the notoriously backward and neo-liberal IMF is calling for higher taxes on the rich.

http://aliran.com/15319.html

If the IMF is calling for the rich to carry a heavier burden in the maintenance of nation-states, you know this argument has already been won. The United States, of course, is behind the curve and slow to catch up, but higher taxes for the rich are coming, I think. Supply-side economics has failed. It appears that the rest of the world knows it.

-Laelth

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
11. Even better.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 12:16 PM
Oct 2013

And how about extending it to ALL forms of income? If we did that, we could lower the percentage even after giving recipients a raise.

Added bonus: boy, would that tie rich knickers in a knot.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Next: Raise the cap on SS...