General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI think Melissa McCarthy looks great on the cover of Elle. What do you think?
Elle Put Melissa McCarthy on Its Cover, and Then Covered Her Up
Slate
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/10/15/melissa_mccarthy_in_elle_the_magazine_put_the_plus_size_comedian_on_its.html
Every November Elle goes cover crazy. For its annual Women in Hollywood issue, instead of picking just one woman to grace the cover, the magazine awards a whole bunch of actresses the not-so-singular honor.
This canny tactic provides Elle with a chance to branch out from the familiar shots of skinny women who appear to have been photographed from about two inches away, as Lady Gaga, Shakira, Kerry Washington, Taylor Swift, and Claire Danes have been in recent months.
In a business where covers have a profound effect on newsstand sales, taking a chance on an unexpected subject represents a big gamble. You might think that by splitting the risk six ways, thered be less riding on one actresss slender shoulders. But in fact, theres typically just one newsstand cover; the other choices go out in the mail to subscribers. Last November, full-figured Oscar-winner Octavia Spencer gave great face on an Elle cover, but it was Sarah Jessica Parkers scrawny bod looking out from the newsstands. (This isnt necessarily a smart business moveAdeles 2012 turn on the cover of Vogue was that years second-best-selling issue.)
Aristus
(66,430 posts)I think she has beautiful dimples.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Coiffed by a top stylist and made up by a professional, and swathed in $20,000 worth of luxurious fashions.
Whether plus-size or heroin-thin, no model on the cover of Elle bears a relationship to real women.
But yeah, she looks great!
dionysus
(26,467 posts)her normal look is much better;
quinnox
(20,600 posts)not very flattering.
OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)Coats, high heeled boots -- you get the idea.
pnwest
(3,266 posts)beautiful. Always have! But this doesn't even remotely look like her. They changed her, airbrushed her, covered her up... Not necessary! She is beautiful!
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)I find it sad they felt it necessary to completely hide her body like that -- they couldn't have found away to make her plus-size body sexy? Shows a complete lack of will and imagination on their part.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I don't get covering her up like that, but she 'loves the cover' and is said to have picked out the coat.
postulater
(5,075 posts)A Republican Congresswoman?
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)including Bridesmaids.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)except with messier hair.
chowder66
(9,074 posts)It's a November edition aka Fall/Autumn. And it says right there The Perfect New Coat Shape. She looks sultry. They have had other models/ actresses on their covers with a coat on or clothes that are not skin tight and the image is usually sultry, sexy, attractive without having to have skin or skin tight clothes. I think it's a nice looking cover that did its job
aka interest in the coat.
And as has been pointed out, she picked the coat, she likes it and doesn't get the controversy. Neither do I
at all.
Oh and not everyone hates comfy clothes that are stylish.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)whoever put the red type over the grey coat should be shot.
RussBLib
(9,026 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)take this photo:
Chan790
(20,176 posts)It just looks big and helmety.
MerryBlooms
(11,770 posts)And, I really like the photo.