Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

maxrandb

(15,345 posts)
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:36 PM Mar 2012

Get Rush off Armed Forces Network, and he's gone for good

What is the demographic that is most prized in the media? It's the same demographic that makes up almost 90% of the armed forces.

This is not censorship, this is common decency. Below is the mission statement and contact link for the Defense Media Activity...a staff position under the Secretary of Defense. Rush simply must not be able to continue to spew his hatred and misogyny to our troops and their families.

Defense Media Activity Mission: DMA is the Department of Defense's direct line of communication for news and information to U.S. forces worldwide. The agency presents news, information and entertainment on a variety of media platforms, including radio, television, internet, print media and emerging media technologies. DMA informs millions of active, Guard and Reserve service members, civilian employees, contractors, military retirees and their families in the U.S. and abroad

Contact us
http://www.dma.mil/dma_contact.html

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Get Rush off Armed Forces Network, and he's gone for good (Original Post) maxrandb Mar 2012 OP
Yes....more than anywhere else he should be off Armed Forces Network..young movonne Mar 2012 #1
Why don't you let the troops decide what they want... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #2
because we're assholes, that's why.. frylock Mar 2012 #6
I'm sure there are some troops... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #10
rush's popularity is vastly overestimated frylock Mar 2012 #13
since when do the troops make decisions concerning what they are provided? Demonaut Mar 2012 #7
What? RZM Mar 2012 #8
Neither do I. They can do it on their own dime, not mine, though n/t eridani Mar 2012 #48
Got it... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #9
The US military and AFN is provided by the American taxpayers. The American national bully shcrane71 Mar 2012 #11
No no.. great idea... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #12
I've seen the affects of Rush's hate speech... it spreads. Olbermann is nowhere near as uncivil shcrane71 Mar 2012 #14
It's absolutely subjective... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #20
Yeah right... Asking that someone post sex tapes on the Internet for his viewing pleasure is civil shcrane71 Mar 2012 #26
No... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #27
How is Olbermann far left? Kingofalldems Mar 2012 #15
Olbermann's far left because he doesn't manufacture his own facts. shcrane71 Mar 2012 #16
+1 sarcasmo Mar 2012 #35
Illuminating Indeed HangOnKids Mar 2012 #17
Thanks. Gio was filthy in his first start yesterday. Kingofalldems Mar 2012 #19
Information doesn't have to mean inflammation; it didn't used to. eShirl Mar 2012 #18
Olbermann is hardly far left - that guy is a liberal. TBF Mar 2012 #23
Subjective.. JSnuffy Mar 2012 #25
Um, Tricare pays for contraception. gulliver Mar 2012 #44
Ok....... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #50
censorship? I think I heard from the right about the left " criticizing the POTUS in a time of war" Demonaut Mar 2012 #21
Indeed... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #28
Funny, when I was a soldier I had no input Kingofalldems Mar 2012 #30
Since now... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #31
Didn't have email in 1967 kid Kingofalldems Mar 2012 #32
Maybe you missed your telegram then... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #33
You talking about condescending and attitude? HangOnKids Mar 2012 #37
There isn't censorship in the military? Really? LiberalFighter Mar 2012 #40
Ok and neither are you... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #49
"You vill listen to vaht VE vant you to listen to." cherokeeprogressive Mar 2012 #41
They did. Back in 1993. rush & the republicans forced Cerridwen Mar 2012 #36
Why is it necessary for the troops to have Rush or anyone else like him? LiberalFighter Mar 2012 #39
As a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, NECESSITY isn't what governs what I can listen cherokeeprogressive Mar 2012 #42
Like I said before... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #51
Do the troops decide what will be on armed forces radio? quakerboy Mar 2012 #53
I thought he'd be gone that time he agreed with the Taliban. CJCRANE Mar 2012 #3
I'd settle for getting him off DU. nt MineralMan Mar 2012 #4
!! JohnnyLib2 Mar 2012 #5
Nice! racaulk Mar 2012 #22
Yes! TBF Mar 2012 #24
I've owned RushOffAFN.com for a while now but haven't done anything with it. HopeHoops Mar 2012 #29
Let's help that at the local level too! calimary Mar 2012 #34
Then if he makes the transition over to Sirius-XM Great Caesars Ghost Mar 2012 #38
So we'll just take away their XM radios if they refuse to stop listening to things we don't approve cherokeeprogressive Mar 2012 #43
Fine ProSense Mar 2012 #45
+1 Rex Mar 2012 #46
Soon, satilite radio will become the new public airwaves Great Caesars Ghost Mar 2012 #52
We're working on it. Major Hogwash Mar 2012 #47

movonne

(9,623 posts)
1. Yes....more than anywhere else he should be off Armed Forces Network..young
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:49 PM
Mar 2012

women in the service do not need this kind talk radio..making their jobs even harder...

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
2. Why don't you let the troops decide what they want...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:53 PM
Mar 2012

... instead of deciding that it is just too much for their sensitive souls.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
6. because we're assholes, that's why..
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:24 PM
Mar 2012

why not allow tom metzger a forum on AFRN? surely there are plenty of bigoted troops that love to listen hate groups like that preach their garbage.

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
10. I'm sure there are some troops...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:38 PM
Mar 2012

... who would like to hear South American pipe music. That doesn't mean that they are going to get it.

The limited options are the reason that the troops, and only the troops, should have the say about what they hear.

The most popular shows give you the most bang for your buck.

Demonaut

(8,924 posts)
7. since when do the troops make decisions concerning what they are provided?
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:42 PM
Mar 2012

as a vet and one deployed for at times months away from the US I sought out anything from "home"
His opinions and the negative influence he spews does not help impressionable young minds, especially ones that have such responsibility in their hands
not to say that liberal views should be the only source of info but limbaugh is in a class of his own

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
8. What?
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:06 PM
Mar 2012

'Impressionable young minds?'

Isn't that a bit patronizing? Military personnel can make up their own minds about what they watch and listen to. If there is a demand for Rush, then I have no problem with them listening to Rush.

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
9. Got it...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:20 PM
Mar 2012

A little bit of patronization and censorship is okay.

Maybe we should block their internet access too? Much of it, especially in the junior ranks, is provided via military housing.

You could start a list of pre-approved messages and speakers that are acceptable for them to listen to. You know, ones that are in the right "class."

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
11. The US military and AFN is provided by the American taxpayers. The American national bully
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:48 PM
Mar 2012

has dished out hatred over US airwaves paid for by the military's boss... the US people. That's how it works in a democracy.

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
12. No no.. great idea...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:52 PM
Mar 2012

I'm sure you'll be thrilled until someone on the right yells out against something you think is worthy.

The best example from my time over there was Olbermann. He was a far left guy with far left views and he was on every day.

If you remove one you have to remove the other and you end up with bland uninformative nothingness. No news, no commentary, no politics and nothing inflammatory from either side of the spectrum.

Maybe you think that's better than to have service members listen to something you don't agree with but I have more faith in them. They will choose what they want and that is what they should get.

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
14. I've seen the affects of Rush's hate speech... it spreads. Olbermann is nowhere near as uncivil
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:01 PM
Mar 2012

Limbaugh uses the airwaves to bully people -- mostly women. The military is made up of all types of people, including women. The number of US service members recovering from rape is at epidemic proportions. His hate speech shouldn't be supported by tax dollars.

Please allow me to thank you for your service.

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
20. It's absolutely subjective...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 05:36 PM
Mar 2012

Whatever you think is uncivil and hate speech is informative and educating political commentary to someone else.

You can't just say "yeah, but they're wrong."

It's just your opinion and so in the end the decision has to stay with the intended audience.

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
26. Yeah right... Asking that someone post sex tapes on the Internet for his viewing pleasure is civil
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 06:36 PM
Mar 2012

discourse. You're making the case more and more that Rush needs to be off AFN. Good job!

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
27. No...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 06:41 PM
Mar 2012

... but feel free to keep claiming it if it makes you happy. I don't care if he stays or goes as I am no longer listening.

The real question is why do you think you know better than the Soldiers who listen to the program? Are you worried that they won't make the choice that you approve of?

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
17. Illuminating Indeed
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:30 PM
Mar 2012

Almost as if the curtains were opened. BTW You guys are gonna love Gio, I am so sorry he left Oakland. He was my daughters FAV!

Kingofalldems

(38,468 posts)
19. Thanks. Gio was filthy in his first start yesterday.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:47 PM
Mar 2012

Nasty curve and hitting 95. And good luck to my boy Tommy Milone.

eShirl

(18,496 posts)
18. Information doesn't have to mean inflammation; it didn't used to.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:34 PM
Mar 2012

Oh and get off my lawn, all you whippersnappers...

TBF

(32,084 posts)
23. Olbermann is hardly far left - that guy is a liberal.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 06:27 PM
Mar 2012

"Far left" is nearly absent in this country at present time.

gulliver

(13,186 posts)
44. Um, Tricare pays for contraception.
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 12:40 AM
Mar 2012

Limbaugh insulted women who take contraception on the American taxpayer's nickel. But the female members of the military do get Tricare, and Tricare pays for contraception. Limbaugh insulted female soldiers, repeatedly, vulgarly, and yes creepily. Limbaugh should be removed from AFN for this. Not because of his far right wing views. For this.

A soldier who called his fellow female soldiers sluts for taking contraception paid for by the taxpayers (in the national media) would be drummed out of the military. There would be no discussion of his rights. Even Limbaugh's most orcish, snorting, deodorant-challenging fan knows that.

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
50. Ok.......
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 05:51 AM
Mar 2012

... so the takeaway from your post seems to be that Limbaugh insulted all women and therefore insulted women in the service as well.

Got it.

The point still stands. Let them decide what they are offended by, what they want to hear and what the ramifications will be instead of you dictating their appropriate level of outrage.

Demonaut

(8,924 posts)
21. censorship? I think I heard from the right about the left " criticizing the POTUS in a time of war"
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 06:10 PM
Mar 2012

but rush never does that...right?
never demeans women...right?
never uses humor to show his racist side...right?
never makes fun of the disabled...right?

never served....right?

JS, you have a bar as your avatar...you served right?

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
28. Indeed...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 06:52 PM
Mar 2012

I don't care what he does. He is just a dude on the radio. Everyone here gives him power by having a spasm every time he says something shocking.

I care about the government dictating that a program that millions of American's listen to and that the troops themselves have decided they want is too much for their delicate sensibilities. Especially when that decision came from outside sources who disagree with his message.

The censorship comment came directly from the post I replied to as certain programs were deemed ok but Limbaugh is in a separate class that should be restricted.

In summary I could give a s@#$ if he stays or goes. I just want the decision to stay with the Soldier and not outsiders who think they know best one way or another. It opens too many doors and I think Joe is smart enough to figure it out for himself.

Last thought - as to the never served comment. For me service is a plus but if I dismissed everyone who hadn't that would wipe out POTUS, most of congress and most other elected officials and the vast vast majority of the American public.

Kingofalldems

(38,468 posts)
30. Funny, when I was a soldier I had no input
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 08:20 PM
Mar 2012

as to what was on the radio. Since when do soldiers make these decisions?

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
31. Since now...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 08:33 PM
Mar 2012

I filled out various surveys about what I liked on AFN radio and TV.

Maybe you should have checked your e-mail?

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
33. Maybe you missed your telegram then...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 09:34 PM
Mar 2012

If you want to be condescending about it.

I'm telling you how it is now. If you'd stop and think for a sec you'd probably realize that you would have appreciated the chance back in the day. I also doubt that you would have appreciated "older and wiser heads" who know whats best for you deciding your entertainment options.

So can the attitude...

LiberalFighter

(51,020 posts)
40. There isn't censorship in the military? Really?
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:45 PM
Mar 2012

The military is not entitled to get anything and everything they want.

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
49. Ok and neither are you...
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 05:42 AM
Mar 2012

... but they are entitled to choose their own entertainment options.

What's your point?

Cerridwen

(13,260 posts)
36. They did. Back in 1993. rush & the republicans forced
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 10:49 PM
Mar 2012

themselves on them anyway.

Why do you think rush gives two fucks about the troops? Or the republicans?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002377930

LiberalFighter

(51,020 posts)
39. Why is it necessary for the troops to have Rush or anyone else like him?
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:42 PM
Mar 2012

There are enough alternative news sources without including him that provide both sides.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
42. As a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, NECESSITY isn't what governs what I can listen
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:57 PM
Mar 2012

to.

Why do people think they can decide what "troops" listen to in the context of what's acceptable to ME, and not acceptable to ME?

Simple solution... Put Ed Schultz on AFRN.

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
51. Like I said before...
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 07:05 AM
Mar 2012

.... maybe you can get an approved list of appropriate news sources and those that are deemed "unacceptable."

Good luck with that...

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
53. Do the troops decide what will be on armed forces radio?
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 01:40 AM
Mar 2012

When I've read up on this previously, it sounded like the choices were made by higher ups, often under heavy political influence, without any solid feedback from the soldiers who listen to it.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
3. I thought he'd be gone that time he agreed with the Taliban.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:55 PM
Mar 2012

That wasn't a very patriotic thing to say IMO.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
29. I've owned RushOffAFN.com for a while now but haven't done anything with it.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 07:40 PM
Mar 2012

I'll try to have it live in some form by the end of the weekend.

calimary

(81,417 posts)
34. Let's help that at the local level too!
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 10:29 PM
Mar 2012

I wanna make sure EVERYBODY sees this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002374653

How to fight back at the local radio, with insights from a former radio person. As one of those, myself, I can vouch for the good ideas in it. I have personally personally witnessed how effective these strategies can be.


Also - for Armed Forces Radio, here's a petition:

http://www.dma.mil/dma_contact.html

 
38. Then if he makes the transition over to Sirius-XM
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:04 PM
Mar 2012

It'll still go to the troops. Hell, Howard Stern (I know it sounds like a bad example) gave away thousands to them with free subscriptions when he made the move.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
43. So we'll just take away their XM radios if they refuse to stop listening to things we don't approve
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 12:26 AM
Mar 2012

of.

"If Uncle Sam wanted you to have a wife, he'd have ISSUED you one."

That reality isn't too far off, if some here have their way.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
45. Fine
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 12:45 AM
Mar 2012

"Then if he makes the transition over to Sirius-XM"

...he'll be off the public airwaves and people can pay Sirius to listen to his vile screeds.

Maybe HBO can give him a program.

 
52. Soon, satilite radio will become the new public airwaves
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 07:31 PM
Mar 2012

and terrestrial will be obsolete. With basic subscriptions dropping (their right wing channel is part of the package), we need to be vigilant and be watchful on this.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
47. We're working on it.
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 02:56 AM
Mar 2012

Senator Carl Levin agrees.
He made a statement about removing that pariah from AFRN just today.

Ed Schultz covered the story on his program.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Get Rush off Armed Forces...