General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuestion: Should convicted felons be able to vote
after they have served their sentence? after probation or parole?
24 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
yes after incarcaration is served | |
8 (33%) |
|
yes while still in jail | |
11 (46%) |
|
yes after probation or parole is over | |
4 (17%) |
|
yes after all fines and restituion is paid | |
0 (0%) |
|
not until 5 years after sentence is served | |
0 (0%) |
|
not until 10 years after sentence is served | |
0 (0%) |
|
lifetime ban | |
1 (4%) |
|
other (share) | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
tblue
(16,350 posts)I rest my case.
eta: By that I mean, YES. Every adult citizen should be permitted to vote. Just because the law got you, it doesn't mean you are no longer a citizen who should have a say about our laws and government.
get the red out
(13,468 posts)Considering so many people have prison records because of the ignorant war on drugs, they should definitely be permitted to vote once released.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Or is it more "there but for luck go I?" I mean what is the difference between a criminal and a working class poor person? To some of our Republican Friends there's no real difference and therefore neither group should be encouraged to vote.
Bryant
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)tblue
(16,350 posts)to a lesser charge because they know they are largely defenseless, even if they are completely innocent. They are overwhelmed and don't know how to maneuver around something like this, so they get scared and admit to anything to get through the whole ugly ordeal as quickly as possible.
Such a nightmare. There but for the grace of _________________ go I.
(Choose all that apply: God, fortune, luck, angels, karma, timing, ancestor intervention, family connections, wealth, cleverness, or who knows what)
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)than my answer might well be "let them vote after they've paid their dues." If 50% of our criminals are convicted rightfully (whether because they plead guilty to lesser charges or because they are breaking silly drug laws or for some other reason) than it makes more sense for them to keep their rights while in prison.
Bryant
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)I think the statistic is about 98% of the cases never go to trial. Unless you are both completely innocent and very wealthy you do not stand a chance. Make a deal, take five years, or go to trial and risk 30. Think Aaron Swartz--that is the norm.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)or just a few of them?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)JVS
(61,935 posts)the prospect of town near a prison having their political landscape dominated by a bunch of prisoners is not going to help with that kind of a situation.
William769
(55,147 posts)JVS
(61,935 posts)but convicted felons voting for or against judges who may still control the conditions of their ongoing service of their sentence doesn't sit well with me. Some guy who stole a car long ago voting for school board members doesn't bug me as much.
petronius
(26,603 posts)the denial of voting rights. People in prison should be allowed to vote absentee (or not vote, if they choose) for everything on the ballot in their home districts. And there should be careful oversight to ensure that their votes are not coerced or manipulated...
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)retread
(3,763 posts)gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Which is obviously not remotely close to reality. But let's just assume for a moment it's true.
What kind of crimes constitute felonies? In my state of Arizona, the possession of ANY quantity of marijuana is a felony. I have pot in my room as I type this. Are you going to tell me there's a meaningful difference in responsibility or ethics between myself and the sorry sap who got sent to prison for pot?
Hell no. So let's up the crime. Let's increase the seriousness. You will find that along the way each crime possesses two bodies of people. Those who got away with it and those who did not. The ones who got away with it retain all of their rights and we as ignorant individuals, or even as informed individuals, would fight for their right to vote. But the second they're convicted all of a sudden they lose that right?
What is so inherently disturbing about a felony conviction that makes an individual unfit to vote? The electorate is composed of all sorts of people who have committed all sorts of crimes along the way and gotten away with it. Do we question their right to vote? No.
So the removal of voting rights due to a felony conviction necessarily becomes arbitrary. And that is something I could never support.
LuvNewcastle
(16,856 posts)ever be taken away. Prisoners lose a lot of rights when they go to prison. The right to freedom, for instance, must necessarily be taken away when someone is convicted of felonies and some misdemeanors. There's no reason why inmates should have to give up their right to vote, however. The right to vote is sacred in a democratic republic and it's a simple matter to bring ballots and let the prisoners vote.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)While generic Tyranny (and pure incompetence) is the #1 most cited reason, harsh law enforcement and punishment is the #2.
For a followup you should try the Bill of Rights. Four of the ten are specifically for people suspected, accused, arrested or convicted of a crime. Clearly this country was founded on the principle that criminals are still citizens.
Disclaimer: it does not, of course, matter. Our laws can, and have, been drastically altered many times in the past. I just wanted to point out that you've taken a position that is less socially progressive than a bunch of people who thought slavery was a necessary evil.
ChazII
(6,206 posts)He escaped but was caught after an episode of Unsolved Mystery aired. Strange to know someone for three years yet never suspect a secret past. He was a good husband and father. He is still in prison, btw.
He should be able to vote to answer the question.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)since 1965.
Probably at least a million.
Good post, thanks!
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)which is how democracies used to work.
Orangepeel
(13,933 posts)gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)it's about losing the right to vote......if you're native born, I don't think you can lose uour citizenship unless you renounce it. I might be wrong though. Anybody know?