Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMurder is Legal, According to Eric Holder by David Swanson
Murder is Legal, According to Eric HolderAttorney General Eric Holder on Monday explained why he thinks it is legal to murder people, even without trial, arrest, or charges filed.
By David Swanson
March 7, 2012
Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday explained why it's legal to murder people -- not to execute prisoners convicted of capital crimes, not to shoot someone in self-defense, not to fight on a battlefield in a war that is somehow legalized, but to target and kill an individual sitting on his sofa, with no charges, no arrest, no trial, no approval from a court, no approval from a legislature, no approval from we the people, and in fact no sharing of information with any institutions that are not the president.
Three quarters of the way through a speech on the legality of murdering people, Holder begins to approach that touchy topic. Here is what he says:
"Now, I realize I have gone into considerable detail about tools we use to identify suspected terrorists and to bring captured terrorists to justice. It is preferable to capture suspected terrorists where feasible among other reasons, so that we can gather valuable intelligence from them but we must also recognize that there are instances where our government has the clear authority and, I would argue, the responsibility to defend the United States through the appropriate and lawful use of lethal force."
By "government" Holder means the president, whether President Obama or President Romney or President Santorum or any man or woman who later becomes president, and nobody else. That one person alone is to decide what is appropriate and lawful and feasible. If the Vice President thinks it is feasible to capture somene, too bad for him. He should have gotten a better job if he wanted to be a decider. If the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court thinks preaching against the United States is not a capital offense, tough tamales. He shouldn't dress in his bathrobe if he wants to be taken seriously. If the United States Congress objects that the president's "surgical strikes" tend to kill too many random men, women, and children, well they know what they can do: Run for president! If the United Nations special rapporteur on extrajudicial killings has objections, well -- Isn't that SPECIAL? And the American people? They can shut up or vote for a racist buffoon from the bad party.
Read the full article at:
http://www.alternet.org/story/154455/murder_is_legal%2C_according_to_eric_holder/?page=entire
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1918 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Murder is Legal, According to Eric Holder by David Swanson (Original Post)
Better Believe It
Mar 2012
OP
jannyk
(4,810 posts)1. k&r
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)2. More David Swanson: "Osama Bin Lynched"...nt
Sid
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)3. It's not murder. nt
Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)4. This guy will love hearing that news...
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)5. Remember Pearl Harbor!
indepat
(20,899 posts)6. You're either with us or a'gin' us: any one having the temerity to question any policy or
action by a president of junior's mindset and ideology would be ripe for being wasted imo, or so I would fear.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)8. It's only murder when Republicans do it
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)9. Full Speech here