Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Archae

(46,344 posts) Sun Mar 11, 2012, 08:54 PM Mar 2012

What did Santorum say about Kony 2012?

With a link please?

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What did Santorum say about Kony 2012? (Original Post) Archae Mar 2012 OP

My guess: "Joseph Kony is doing the Lord's Work." baldguy Mar 2012 #1

He said, "Kony Island? Never been to NY" nt joeybee12 Mar 2012 #2

Win. nt Chorophyll Mar 2012 #3

Is your search engine broken? SomethingFishy Mar 2012 #4

I tried. Archae Mar 2012 #5

baldguy

(36,649 posts)

1. My guess: "Joseph Kony is doing the Lord's Work."

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 09:01 PM

Mar 2012

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)

2. He said, "Kony Island? Never been to NY" nt

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 09:05 PM

Mar 2012

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)

3. Win. nt

Reply to joeybee12 (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 09:06 PM

Mar 2012

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)

4. Is your search engine broken?

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 09:18 PM

Mar 2012

First thing that came up when I tried Google was your thread.

Which makes me think I am a complete and utter idiot for even wasting my time looking. How about YOU find out what he said and post a link for US.

Archae

(46,344 posts)

5. I tried.

Reply to SomethingFishy (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 09:46 PM

Mar 2012

First recognizable link I got was a guy's blog, recounting an imaginary Santorum conversation.

In one of the threads here, a poster said Santorum had weighed in on this, siding with Kony.

(#2 here)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002413229

Reply to this discussion