Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRep. Zoe Lofgren: TPP 'would lock in really backwards provisions' of copyright law
http://lofgren.house.gov/latest-news/rep-zoe-lofgren-on-emerging-controversial-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp-trade-treaty/WASHINGTON, D.C. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) participated in a press conference today voicing concerns over the emerging Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade pact. During the press conference, held on the eve of this coming weekends high-level ministerial meeting on TPP in Singapore in which a possible final deal may be announced, Rep. Lofgren focused her remarks on troubling provisions related to Internet Freedom, consumer rights, copyright, and fair use and the public domain in the digital age:
I just wanted to address the leaked IP chapter of the TPP because weve expressed concern in the past that these trade agreements really are at the expense of consumer rights, fair use, and the public domain. In fact I wrote to the USTR [U.S. Trade Representative] about these issues in September 2012 and it doesnt look like theyve been resolved.
First, the leaked TPP text would apparently export new copyright terms to signatory countries, rather than allowing the copyright term to be determined by each country. We are trying to press a current copyright term of life plus seventy years I mean were talking about a couple of centuries in terms. Mexico is talking about a hundred years. I personally think thats too long, but the TPP would lock that in for all signatory countries.
Second, it looks like there would be new restrictions on limitations and exceptions to copyright such as what we in the U.S. enjoy as fair use. I believe that fair use in the digital age is absolutely crucial to creativity, education, social commentary, free speech and yet it appears that the signatories would confine copyright limitations to certain special cases. This could lead to an abuse by rights holders. It is not innocuous and would be at odds with the First Amendment of the United States.
Third, the leaked TPP provides extensive provisions on technical protection measures, such as DRM, to prevent copying or modifying copyrighted work. Now this is something that has come to the publics attention here in the United States when the Librarian (of Congress) said you couldnt unlock your cellphone. Were trying to change it. This provision looks like it would lock in really backwards provisions of law.
In closing, this is something that is backdooring, through a trade agreement, that which could not be obtained in Congress. I think we all remember SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act. Millions of Americans shut the phone system down in the United States Congress. It looks like there are some elements of SOPA that are being inserted into this trade agreement and I dont think the American people are going to put up with it.
(News release; not copyrighted)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 582 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Zoe Lofgren: TPP 'would lock in really backwards provisions' of copyright law (Original Post)
Newsjock
Dec 2013
OP