Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 11:51 AM Dec 2013

Mike Adams is a real scientist, dammit, and he will save us from “toxins”!

Last edited Sat Dec 7, 2013, 12:48 PM - Edit history (1)

Orac tears Mike Adams and naturalnews apart, again.

Well, wouldn’t you know it? Mike Adams thinks he’s an actual scientist!

Regular readers are all too familiar with Mike Adams, a.k.a. The Health Ranger, arguably the most quacktastic site on the Internet. Sure, Joe Mercola is probably the most trafficked quackery site on the Internet, but, being number two (or number three or four, I’m not sure), Mike Adams definitely tries harder. In addition, Joe Mercola steers mostly clear of politics and non-medical pseudoscience. Sure, he promotes just as much quackery as Mike Adams does, if not more, but he doesn’t delve into Tea Party-drenched New World Order conspiracy mongering the way Adams does. Indeed, Adams regularly appears on the network of the über-crank to rule all über-cranks, Alex Jones. You know that if a person is considered “worthy” enough to appear on Alex Jones’s network, you know he is among the most elite of cranks. To borrow a term from recent political parlance, you know he’s a member of the 1% when it comes to crankery. To prove it, he also “questions” evolution and a couple of years ago he produced a short film that portrayed science as the inevitable gateway to the Holocaust.

Three months ago, Mike Adams tried to represent himself as Real Scientist, and, according to one of my favorite clichés, hilarity ensued. For example, he decided that PubMed was too broad a source to spread his message, given that it actually publishes articles that counter his message; so he decided to try to create his own version of PubMed. Next, he decided that he wanted to show how evil McDonald’s Chicken McNuggets are. Now, this in and of itself isn’t necessarily such a bad thing, although it needs to be repeated that no one is claiming that McNuggets are health food, not even McDonald’s. So Adams bought some McNuggets, looked at them under his stereomicroscope, and made a video. In it, he was shocked—shocked, I say!—that they looked weird and alien when magnified a couple of hundred times. Actually, I probably shouldn’t be quoting that classic scene from the movie Casablanca, because in that scene it was obvious that no one was shocked at all that gambling was going on at Rick’s American Cafe. In marked contrast, Mike Adams appeared truly shocked at seeing fibers and strand-like objects that he naturally identified as Morgellons fibers. Never mind that they were probably nothing more than dust, perhaps flour, and almost certainly pepper or other seasoning. Adams had a real microscope, and he wasn’t afraid to use it (although he was completely incompetent at it).

Yes, Mikey thinks he’s a real scientist now. If you don’t believe me, just check out a post from a couple of days ago over at his repository of all things quackery and political hackery, NaturalNews.com, entitled Health Ranger releases first photo from the Natural News Forensic Food Lab. Apparently, this is where the “ground breaking” research that Adams promised to reveal on January 7, 2014 is going on. I’ve been very curious about just what the heck it is that Adams is brewing in his home brew laboratory. Incompetently performed science, no doubt, but what and how entertainingly incompetent will it be? I rather suspect it will be epic. Right now, this article is complete with a picture of Adams sitting in front of a lab bench with a feces-eating (sorry, no more profanity allowed here at ScienceBlogs, at least not by the bloggers) grin on his face and gloating:


http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/12/06/mike-adams-is-a-real-scientist-dammit-and-he-will-save-us-from-toxins/


If you're ever tempted to quote something from naturalnews as if it were legitimate research, don't. Just don't.



Sid
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mike Adams is a real scientist, dammit, and he will save us from “toxins”! (Original Post) SidDithers Dec 2013 OP
I used to get his newsletter and he made such a hard right turn I stopped subscribing kimbutgar Dec 2013 #1
you accepted his woo and quackery and anti-science but changed your mind... mike_c Dec 2013 #4
Not actually, I noticed his theories were starting to sound alex jones prison planet like kimbutgar Dec 2013 #16
A listing of Sid's Party of No Prohibitions would be helpful DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2013 #2
I think its more like places that if you source as "serious" sites... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #10
I've never read Natural News, and I don't doubt what you say DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2013 #11
... SidDithers Dec 2013 #12
You don't get to decide that SidDithers doesn't get to decide! Silent3 Dec 2013 #13
Your words, not mine. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2013 #15
Sid seems to desire the same thing I do... ElboRuum Dec 2013 #17
the woo is strong with this one, young Skywalker.... mike_c Dec 2013 #3
His expose on Chicken McNuggets is thing to behold... SidDithers Dec 2013 #5
He discovered pepper under a microscope! Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #9
Food Ranger Discovers Pepper! HappyMe Dec 2013 #19
Link? Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #6
Oh shit. Forgot it in the OP.... SidDithers Dec 2013 #8
There's quite a few woo sites people here need to quit sourcing. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #7
Naturalnews is the most reputable source for crackpot conspiracies and wacky medical quackery Brother Buzz Dec 2013 #14
Kicking... SidDithers Dec 2013 #18
Even I agree with you on this issue - TBF Dec 2013 #20

kimbutgar

(21,157 posts)
1. I used to get his newsletter and he made such a hard right turn I stopped subscribing
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 11:56 AM
Dec 2013

The guy is a shrill right winger. When he got political and started spouting anti ACA talking points I knew he was a charlatan. His site became so anti Obama like someone gave him funding to attack.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
4. you accepted his woo and quackery and anti-science but changed your mind...
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 12:43 PM
Dec 2013

...when his politics diverged?

kimbutgar

(21,157 posts)
16. Not actually, I noticed his theories were starting to sound alex jones prison planet like
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 10:35 PM
Dec 2013

And the final straw was the Obama derangement. It got to the point I stopped thinking he was reliable and a good source. And I was g the emails and no longer reading them.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
2. A listing of Sid's Party of No Prohibitions would be helpful
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 11:58 AM
Dec 2013

Just a short list of items you want banned from GD would be nice.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
10. I think its more like places that if you source as "serious" sites...
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 12:59 PM
Dec 2013

like Natural News and other such woo sites, its the equivalent to linking to World Nut Daily to bolster your political points, a great way to demolish your credibility.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
11. I've never read Natural News, and I don't doubt what you say
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 01:16 PM
Dec 2013

I'm just tired of Sid wanting to control what can and can't be talked about here. These sorts of posts comprise a large percentage of his posts. If something is ridiculously woo and hasn't already been banned on this site by admin, let the court of DU opinion shoot down those posts or let them sink. I was reacting to the ongoing posting pattern that attempts to control the conversation here outside the parameters of the actual conversation. SidDithers doesn't get to decide what speech is prohibited here, no matter how much he wants to. Thanks.

Silent3

(15,220 posts)
13. You don't get to decide that SidDithers doesn't get to decide!
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 01:28 PM
Dec 2013

Really? Voicing a strong a opinion about something in unapologetic terms is "decid(ing) what speech is prohibited here"?

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
15. Your words, not mine.
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 01:44 PM
Dec 2013

I spoke of a pattern of posting. It's verifiable, if you're interested, and if you're not, you're not. None of this has the tendency to budge reality in the least.

ElboRuum

(4,717 posts)
17. Sid seems to desire the same thing I do...
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 10:48 PM
Dec 2013

...and I am sure many others here do, and that is NOT to squelch speech or direct conversation. On the contrary, it is to encourage conversation, but with a nod to QUALITY. DU is a great and informative place when the people who post take it UPON THEMSELVES to keep the signal-to-noise ratio high, regardless of the topic. What is detrimental to this is when the support for people's arguments are from disreputable or questionable sources, highly biased sources that are long on rhetoric but short on fact, or sources that are just outright garbage (like the one the OP refers to).

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
5. His expose on Chicken McNuggets is thing to behold...
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 12:45 PM
Dec 2013





Caution. Don't watch with a mouthful of coffee or any other liquid beverage. You'll end up spraying it all over your computer.

Sid
 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
9. He discovered pepper under a microscope!
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 12:51 PM
Dec 2013

Wow. He must be the first person to ever see pepper under high magnification!

What a hack. That was laughable.

Brother Buzz

(36,444 posts)
14. Naturalnews is the most reputable source for crackpot conspiracies and wacky medical quackery
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 01:41 PM
Dec 2013

Mike Adams is pure entertainment gold, dammit, I listen to all his flavors of woo on Coast to Coast often.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
18. Kicking...
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 04:51 PM
Dec 2013

in light of the unlocked thread currently in GD seriously promoting the idiocy of Mike Adams.

Edit: Holy fuck, they locked it.

Sid

TBF

(32,064 posts)
20. Even I agree with you on this issue -
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 05:47 PM
Dec 2013

and it's not very often that happens.

Science, people, it's a wonderful thing - especially when there are studies w/peer review. As opposed to Mike Adams and his home lab.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mike Adams is a real scie...