General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMike Adams is a real scientist, dammit, and he will save us from “toxins”!
Last edited Sat Dec 7, 2013, 12:48 PM - Edit history (1)
Orac tears Mike Adams and naturalnews apart, again.
Regular readers are all too familiar with Mike Adams, a.k.a. The Health Ranger, arguably the most quacktastic site on the Internet. Sure, Joe Mercola is probably the most trafficked quackery site on the Internet, but, being number two (or number three or four, Im not sure), Mike Adams definitely tries harder. In addition, Joe Mercola steers mostly clear of politics and non-medical pseudoscience. Sure, he promotes just as much quackery as Mike Adams does, if not more, but he doesnt delve into Tea Party-drenched New World Order conspiracy mongering the way Adams does. Indeed, Adams regularly appears on the network of the über-crank to rule all über-cranks, Alex Jones. You know that if a person is considered worthy enough to appear on Alex Joness network, you know he is among the most elite of cranks. To borrow a term from recent political parlance, you know hes a member of the 1% when it comes to crankery. To prove it, he also questions evolution and a couple of years ago he produced a short film that portrayed science as the inevitable gateway to the Holocaust.
Three months ago, Mike Adams tried to represent himself as Real Scientist, and, according to one of my favorite clichés, hilarity ensued. For example, he decided that PubMed was too broad a source to spread his message, given that it actually publishes articles that counter his message; so he decided to try to create his own version of PubMed. Next, he decided that he wanted to show how evil McDonalds Chicken McNuggets are. Now, this in and of itself isnt necessarily such a bad thing, although it needs to be repeated that no one is claiming that McNuggets are health food, not even McDonalds. So Adams bought some McNuggets, looked at them under his stereomicroscope, and made a video. In it, he was shockedshocked, I say!that they looked weird and alien when magnified a couple of hundred times. Actually, I probably shouldnt be quoting that classic scene from the movie Casablanca, because in that scene it was obvious that no one was shocked at all that gambling was going on at Ricks American Cafe. In marked contrast, Mike Adams appeared truly shocked at seeing fibers and strand-like objects that he naturally identified as Morgellons fibers. Never mind that they were probably nothing more than dust, perhaps flour, and almost certainly pepper or other seasoning. Adams had a real microscope, and he wasnt afraid to use it (although he was completely incompetent at it).
Yes, Mikey thinks hes a real scientist now. If you dont believe me, just check out a post from a couple of days ago over at his repository of all things quackery and political hackery, NaturalNews.com, entitled Health Ranger releases first photo from the Natural News Forensic Food Lab. Apparently, this is where the ground breaking research that Adams promised to reveal on January 7, 2014 is going on. Ive been very curious about just what the heck it is that Adams is brewing in his home brew laboratory. Incompetently performed science, no doubt, but what and how entertainingly incompetent will it be? I rather suspect it will be epic. Right now, this article is complete with a picture of Adams sitting in front of a lab bench with a feces-eating (sorry, no more profanity allowed here at ScienceBlogs, at least not by the bloggers) grin on his face and gloating:
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/12/06/mike-adams-is-a-real-scientist-dammit-and-he-will-save-us-from-toxins/
If you're ever tempted to quote something from naturalnews as if it were legitimate research, don't. Just don't.
Sid
kimbutgar
(21,157 posts)The guy is a shrill right winger. When he got political and started spouting anti ACA talking points I knew he was a charlatan. His site became so anti Obama like someone gave him funding to attack.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)...when his politics diverged?
kimbutgar
(21,157 posts)And the final straw was the Obama derangement. It got to the point I stopped thinking he was reliable and a good source. And I was g the emails and no longer reading them.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Just a short list of items you want banned from GD would be nice.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)like Natural News and other such woo sites, its the equivalent to linking to World Nut Daily to bolster your political points, a great way to demolish your credibility.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I'm just tired of Sid wanting to control what can and can't be talked about here. These sorts of posts comprise a large percentage of his posts. If something is ridiculously woo and hasn't already been banned on this site by admin, let the court of DU opinion shoot down those posts or let them sink. I was reacting to the ongoing posting pattern that attempts to control the conversation here outside the parameters of the actual conversation. SidDithers doesn't get to decide what speech is prohibited here, no matter how much he wants to. Thanks.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Silent3
(15,220 posts)Really? Voicing a strong a opinion about something in unapologetic terms is "decid(ing) what speech is prohibited here"?
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I spoke of a pattern of posting. It's verifiable, if you're interested, and if you're not, you're not. None of this has the tendency to budge reality in the least.
ElboRuum
(4,717 posts)...and I am sure many others here do, and that is NOT to squelch speech or direct conversation. On the contrary, it is to encourage conversation, but with a nod to QUALITY. DU is a great and informative place when the people who post take it UPON THEMSELVES to keep the signal-to-noise ratio high, regardless of the topic. What is detrimental to this is when the support for people's arguments are from disreputable or questionable sources, highly biased sources that are long on rhetoric but short on fact, or sources that are just outright garbage (like the one the OP refers to).
mike_c
(36,281 posts)Sheesh.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Caution. Don't watch with a mouthful of coffee or any other liquid beverage. You'll end up spraying it all over your computer.
Sid
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)Wow. He must be the first person to ever see pepper under high magnification!
What a hack. That was laughable.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)That was funny.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)I'll fix.
Sid
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)Mike Adams is pure entertainment gold, dammit, I listen to all his flavors of woo on Coast to Coast often.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)in light of the unlocked thread currently in GD seriously promoting the idiocy of Mike Adams.
Edit: Holy fuck, they locked it.
Sid
TBF
(32,064 posts)and it's not very often that happens.
Science, people, it's a wonderful thing - especially when there are studies w/peer review. As opposed to Mike Adams and his home lab.