Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,013 posts)
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 06:29 PM Dec 2013

Why unemployment insurance should be extended and why Rand Paul is wrong

People on unemployment keep looking for work. When they get kicked off, they quit searching.

First, to receive unemployment benefits, Americans must prove they are searching for work. This requirement exists specifically to combat Paul's concern. A recent study found that when the benefits expire in January, the unemployment rate may drop 0.25-0.5 percentage point as disheartened workers stop looking for work when they can no longer receive benefits. The only thing keeping these Americans from giving up entirely is the EUC program.

Second, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, unemployment benefits are only $300 per week on average, though it varies widely by state. That's barely above the poverty line.

Third, long-term unemployed workers are at a distinct disadvantage in finding jobs. Once a person has been out of work for more than 26 weeks, employers are much less likely to hire them. This may be the greatest long-term effect of the great recession. Long-term unemployment may be making millions of workers permanently unemployable. Many of the long-term unemployed are not foregoing work because of their extra benefits. They simply can't get jobs at all.

Fourth, the empirical evidence on how unemployment benefits affect work incentives is mixed. This past April, researchers at the San Francisco Fed looked at whether the EUC program discouraged work from 2009 to 2012. They found that the extended benefits cause a slight decrease on the unemployment exit rate, but this primarily results from keeping Americans searching for work who otherwise would have dropped out of the labor force. In other words, the benefits did not cause people to forego work. They kept people looking for it.



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-why-rand-paul-is-wrong-about-unemployment-benefits-2013-12#ixzz2mvPYCxAw
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why unemployment insurance should be extended and why Rand Paul is wrong (Original Post) kpete Dec 2013 OP
Rand Paul is talking to an ever shrinking group of RW zealots. Neither he nor they will listen to CTyankee Dec 2013 #1

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
1. Rand Paul is talking to an ever shrinking group of RW zealots. Neither he nor they will listen to
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 06:33 PM
Dec 2013

ANYTHING that contradicts their cooked up outrage. The studies are useful for us but these people are hopeless. They will all go to their graves shot through with outrage and bitterness.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why unemployment insuranc...