Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 11:35 PM Dec 2013

"NO CONTEST: EDWARD SNOWDEN IS PERSON OF THE YEAR"

In an effort to gin up a bit of publicity for its annual choice for “Person of the Year,” Time has released its list of ten finalists. They include Pope Francis, President Obama, Jeff Bezos, Miley Cyrus, Ted Cruz, and two Middle Eastern leaders: Bashar al-Assad, the embattled President of Syria, and Hassan Rouhani, the new President of Iran. Of these, Pope Francis is by far the strongest candidate, but even the radical new Pontiff can’t compete with another troublemaker on the list: Edward Snowden, the former N.S.A. contractor who is currently residing somewhere in Russia as the guest of Vladimir Putin, Time’s 2007 honoree.

According to Time, its award, which will be bestowed on Wednesday, goes to the person who, in the opinion of the magazine’s editors, had the most influence on the news. By this metric, it’s no contest. In downloading thousands of files from the computers of the electronic spying agency and handing them over to journalists like Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, and Barton Gellman, Snowden unleashed a torrent of news stories that began in May, when the Guardian and the Washington Post published a series of articles about the N.S.A.’s surveillance activities. Seven months later, the gusher is still open. Just last week, we learned that the agency is tracking the whereabouts of hundreds of millions of cell phones, gathering nearly five billion records a day.

It’s not just here in the United States. Snowden’s revelations are still causing ruptures and generating headlines all around the world, including in Brazil, which has just said that it wants to question Snowden about revelations that the U.S. agency intercepted the communications of President Dilma Rousseff and her aides; in Germany, where the N.S.A. reportedly tapped Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cell phone; and in Australia, where the government was embarrassed by the revelation that it had been spying on the President of neighboring Indonesia. And there are almost certainly more stories to come. Last week, Alan Rusbridger, the editor of the Guardian, said that his paper has so far published only one per cent of the files that it received from Snowden. (The Guardian has already anointed Snowden its “Person of the Year.”)


More at: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2013/12/no-contest-edward-snowden-is-person-of-the-year.html
80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"NO CONTEST: EDWARD SNOWDEN IS PERSON OF THE YEAR" (Original Post) Logical Dec 2013 OP
Yeah, JimboBillyBubbaBob Dec 2013 #1
snowden is definitely man of the year questionseverything Dec 2013 #55
I vote Miley Cyrus. zappaman Dec 2013 #2
I liked it. Didn't see the big deal. n-t Logical Dec 2013 #3
O M G !!! zappaman Dec 2013 #4
Age showing? I remember my parents hating Madonna. n-t Logical Dec 2013 #6
Shit...I hated Madonna. n/t zappaman Dec 2013 #9
Indeed, it's too bad music doesn't have wholesome, tasteful role models anymore. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #8
fer sure! zappaman Dec 2013 #10
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Shit Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #12
Okay, I just watched it. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #31
It's the "Feelings" of a new generation. reformist2 Dec 2013 #44
I am not at all surprised. nm rhett o rick Dec 2013 #14
Of course you aren't zappaman Dec 2013 #21
Thank you; this at least provisionally redeems your earlier flippance toward something snot Dec 2013 #24
I vote for Edward Snowden. Hands down. Edward Snowden is changing the way our JDPriestly Dec 2013 #23
Increasingly? Apparently not fast enough to make him Person of the Year hands down. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #27
Her video inspired a parody that has brought joy to millions. reformist2 Dec 2013 #43
I voted for Assange, Snowy and Miley are shit compared to him snooper2 Dec 2013 #45
One of the few that can destroy the U.S.S Enterprise. Rex Dec 2013 #48
That zappaman Dec 2013 #52
I watched it about a 100 times when it first showed up on youtube. Rex Dec 2013 #57
OMG!! Kurovski Dec 2013 #53
The fact that Miley is even on the list... DontTreadOnMe Dec 2013 #5
I 100% agree with that. Duck Dynasty proves it to me. n-t Logical Dec 2013 #7
You are making a case for the Duck Dynasty guys as "person of the year"? zappaman Dec 2013 #11
LOL, no, just more dumbing down of people. Nt Logical Dec 2013 #13
Well, I vote for YOU! Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #15
Damn, I thought you really meant me! nt Logical Dec 2013 #17
Your just so logical! Logically speaking of course! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #28
Yes He Is... Should Be The Person Of The 21st Century... WillyT Dec 2013 #16
Thank you, Edward Snowden. woo me with science Dec 2013 #18
Definitely person of he year, maybe of the next century. sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #19
the next Century???? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #29
Snowden can drag and drop classified docs from one folder to another Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #32
Yes because Snowden is JUST like Nelson Mandela right? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #37
I was being sarcastic Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #40
And Mandella was already PotY, 1993. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #34
It has nothing to do with the fact that he died... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #36
Whoa, where'd that come from? NuclearDem Dec 2013 #38
Oh great... SoapBox Dec 2013 #20
I think I'd vote for Pope Francis. calimary Dec 2013 #22
I love the new Pope; but snot Dec 2013 #26
Risked all what? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #30
Risked carpal tunnel by using his mouse. great white snark Dec 2013 #39
Snowden had more to lose anti partisan Dec 2013 #47
Mandela risked his life. He could have capitulated or sold out at any time. CJCRANE Dec 2013 #51
Where could he have had a cushy life? anti partisan Dec 2013 #58
Maybe not as privileged as Snowden but I don't agree with your thesis. CJCRANE Dec 2013 #59
He could have just run away and hid under Putin's skirt tails apparently....because VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #69
So its about risking your "priviledge"? So snowden is suffering more than Mandela VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #70
Thank you for perfectly encapsulating the thought processes of FAR too many of Snowden's fans here Number23 Dec 2013 #66
Are you freaking shitting me? You really feel good about saying that? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #67
Mandela died of old age. former9thward Dec 2013 #63
because he was a tough old coot... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #72
Good point. However, Pope Francis ripping trickle-down will create its own trickle-down - calimary Dec 2013 #35
kick..nt Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #25
I would have to agree. Although Pope Francis certainly has the potential of having an even greater Douglas Carpenter Dec 2013 #33
Snowden? The coward who gave state secrets to Beijing & Moscow? Aw fuck. =( AverageJoe90 Dec 2013 #41
Recommend jsr Dec 2013 #42
Ruh roh... Rex Dec 2013 #46
I'd say it's between him and Pope Francis. KamaAina Dec 2013 #49
The BOG is going to freak out when Snowden wins. DesMoinesDem Dec 2013 #50
At least Time didn't make it someone really despicable like Peyton fuckin' Manning Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #54
Peyton Manning is "despicable"? zappaman Dec 2013 #60
Well, for starters he's Volunteer scum Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #61
Lol zappaman Dec 2013 #62
I doubt he will get it but it would be an interesting choice. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #56
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2013 #64
Malala Yousafzai nt Tveil Dec 2013 #65
Second. Number23 Dec 2013 #68
yes! n/t wildbilln864 Dec 2013 #71
Okay so they just change the title to "Traitor of the Year" and problem solved. 4bucksagallon Dec 2013 #73
I agree. And I think he's a spineless douchebag Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #74
Finally someone who gets it. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #79
Snowden did cause a noteworthy amount of damage. gulliver Dec 2013 #75
Until Pope Francis ramped it up, there was actually a case for Snowy BeyondGeography Dec 2013 #76
What? No al-Sisi? MADem Dec 2013 #77
I doubt they would give it to Snowden. moondust Dec 2013 #78
Pope Francis named Time person of the year. n/t Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #80

questionseverything

(9,657 posts)
55. snowden is definitely man of the year
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:57 PM
Dec 2013

this op did not get enough attention.....the story it presents is chilling

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024153019

snowden gave us our last best chance to protect the 4th amendment,how we find our power i do not know

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
31. Okay, I just watched it.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 04:06 AM
Dec 2013

The video is no big deal, but the song is just awful. I'm pretty sure this was the first time I've ever listened to one of her songs. Has she always been that bad? I could play that song on a loop to keep crows out of the garden.

snot

(10,530 posts)
24. Thank you; this at least provisionally redeems your earlier flippance toward something
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:28 AM
Dec 2013

too few here seem willing to accord its proper value.

(Although . . . the value of mental organization is debatable; though I personally like it a heckuva lot.)

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
23. I vote for Edward Snowden. Hands down. Edward Snowden is changing the way our
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:27 AM
Dec 2013

government works and he is changing it for the better. Increasingly, people are thinking about the Snowden revelations and what they mean for our future as a democracy. At this point it is only the most intelligent, discerning people who understand what the meaning is of the NSA surveillance for the future of our country and democracy. But just wait, the Snowden revelations are a turning point. If the NSA surveillance continues, our country will descend into an oligarchic dictatorship. If we can get the NSA surveillance under control so that it is truly limited to what is needed for our defense, we will succeed as the greatest democracy in the world. So Snowden should win hands down.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
27. Increasingly? Apparently not fast enough to make him Person of the Year hands down.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:35 AM
Dec 2013

oh well...there's always next year.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
45. I voted for Assange, Snowy and Miley are shit compared to him
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:29 PM
Dec 2013

Look at this GREATNESS!


It makes me want to run to Wells Fargo down the street and steal one of their file cabinets!!!




 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
48. One of the few that can destroy the U.S.S Enterprise.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:36 PM
Dec 2013

And as most know, that fucker is hard to destroy man! Yet Miley and her VMA performance did just that!


 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
57. I watched it about a 100 times when it first showed up on youtube.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:58 PM
Dec 2013

You know...I think Miley is just copying one of the GREATEST rock performers in history...yes, none other than BILL THE CAT!





zappaman

(20,606 posts)
11. You are making a case for the Duck Dynasty guys as "person of the year"?
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 12:31 AM
Dec 2013

Hmmmm...I might have to rethink my choice...

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
16. Yes He Is... Should Be The Person Of The 21st Century...
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 01:21 AM
Dec 2013

Because what we decide now... based upon his information... will affect the next hundred years.

At least.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
19. Definitely person of he year, maybe of the next century.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 01:30 AM
Dec 2013

He shook up a world that badly needed shaking.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
29. the next Century????
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:38 AM
Dec 2013

Wow.....just wow....that kinda says it all right there doesn't it? For the next 100 yrs....seriously?

You do know Nelson Mandela just passed away right?

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
32. Snowden can drag and drop classified docs from one folder to another
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 04:18 AM
Dec 2013

He's the person of the next millennium.

Drag and drop, baby.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
37. Yes because Snowden is JUST like Nelson Mandela right?
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 01:02 PM
Dec 2013





By the way, I am not saying that Mandela should be person of the year...just trying to put some perspective on your opinion of this Snowden character and the unfounded worshipping he gets. So here's some homework for you...

Mandela vs Snowden....compare and contrast!
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
40. I was being sarcastic
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 01:49 PM
Dec 2013


The point I was trying to make was that people like Mandela really struggled while Snowden just copied classified documents.

I think we are in agreement

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
34. And Mandella was already PotY, 1993.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 05:23 AM
Dec 2013

People are named PotY when they're currently making news, not after their deaths.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
36. It has nothing to do with the fact that he died...
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 12:59 PM
Dec 2013

its about the facts of his life....you might want to look into it to see what a person who stands up for his beliefs and DESERVES to be honored looks like...

My god...person of the next 100 yrs. What is he like equal to our Founding Fathers now? He is no George Washington....THAT is risking it all.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
38. Whoa, where'd that come from?
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 01:08 PM
Dec 2013

I'm not impugning Nelson Mandela at all. The fact is when Time puts out Person of the Year, it's always someone who's had a significant impact on the news that year.

Mandela had a lifetime of achievements, and he was honored with PotY in 1993. But Snowden has had a significant impact on the news and on governments around the world this year.

And if it'll make you feel better, PotY is not limited to all "good" people.

snot

(10,530 posts)
26. I love the new Pope; but
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:34 AM
Dec 2013

Snowden has risked all, and has in fact sacrificed nearly all; and at an age when he still had a lot to lose.

And the amount of concrete change that has already taken place because of his actions is also greater, i.m.h.o.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
30. Risked all what?
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:41 AM
Dec 2013

I have to ask again....you know Mandela just died right? THAT'S what risking it ALL looks like...

Risking it all....puleeze!

great white snark

(2,646 posts)
39. Risked carpal tunnel by using his mouse.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 01:09 PM
Dec 2013

Fuck undeserved jail time, Snowy could have had wrist discomfort! What a hero!

anti partisan

(429 posts)
47. Snowden had more to lose
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:30 PM
Dec 2013

When you ain't got nothing, you got nothing to lose. Try putting things in perspective a bit.

Snowden had a much more comfortable life than someone like Mandela living in apartheid South Africa. If Mandela was making a 6 figure paycheck at a comfy desk job, would he have been prepared to risk it all for the greater good? Just something to think about. The truth is that we will never know.

Mandela also had a rather dark past with associations to terrorism and senseless executions. I'd rather look to Tutu as the man with the strongest moral character in the fight against apartheid.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
51. Mandela risked his life. He could have capitulated or sold out at any time.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:46 PM
Dec 2013

He could have asked for a pay off but he didn't, he kept to his principles.

And you obviously don't know that Mandela was a qualified lawyer. He could have had a cushy life somewhere else but he risked it all instead.

anti partisan

(429 posts)
58. Where could he have had a cushy life?
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 03:01 PM
Dec 2013

He would have had to completely abandon his social network in order to even have a chance of doing so, and even then, you think an African lawyer would be making the big bucks in the mostly white countries where lawyers tend to prosper? Come on. Think this out a bit more. He was nowhere near as privileged as Edward Snowden.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
59. Maybe not as privileged as Snowden but I don't agree with your thesis.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 03:31 PM
Dec 2013

Mandela faced his own captives in his own country. He was arrested and could have been sentenced to death but he remained defiant. He could have accepted his captives' conditions at any time and been released but he held out for 27 years.

And to somehow insinuate that being in prison is good because you are near your family is nonsense. Mandela was only allowed to see his wife once every six months and his children once a year.

He was in solitary confinement with a bucket to do his ablutions.

Mandela was highly educated and could have had a comfortable life so your dismissal of his achievements rings hollow.

Edward Snowden hasn't faced anything like that. He still has some measure of freedom within Russia and I'm sure his family could visit him. That's not to denigrate Edward Snowden - I think he did a very good thing but nowhere near the stature of Mandela.


 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
69. He could have just run away and hid under Putin's skirt tails apparently....because
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 07:34 PM
Dec 2013

you seem to think that's "risking it all".

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
70. So its about risking your "priviledge"? So snowden is suffering more than Mandela
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 07:35 PM
Dec 2013

by working as tech support in Russia?

Number23

(24,544 posts)
66. Thank you for perfectly encapsulating the thought processes of FAR too many of Snowden's fans here
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 07:30 PM
Dec 2013
If Mandela was making a 6 figure paycheck at a comfy desk job, would he have been prepared to risk it all for the greater good?

I'm not even a Catholic but Holy Mary, Mother of God. There are not enough face palms in the WHOLE DAMN WORLD to describe my reaction to this post.

You're right. Mandela didn't risk much. That jail cell at Robben Island probably had excellent views! And even though at the height of Snowden's revelations over the summer, he was only able to muster up mid-50's support from Americans, hell he was only able to muster low 50s support from Russians even AFTER he did his love fest with the Russian government (that probably explains his tepid support from Russian citizens, actually), you guys are absolutely right. Mandela hasn't done anything as brave, noble or selfless as Snowden.

Why, I can only imagine the world wide response when Snowden passes at 95. Will make Mandela's state funeral attended by tens of thousands and viewed by literally millions of mourners of all colors and races all over the world and attended by heads of state the world over look like nothing.

calimary

(81,387 posts)
35. Good point. However, Pope Francis ripping trickle-down will create its own trickle-down -
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 12:26 PM
Dec 2013

but a rather volcanic trickle-down at that. Will have reverberations across the globe through the one billion-plus Catholics and everybody they (we) touch. I'm hoping it really wakes some people up - and shakes a lot MORE people up. I dunno - maybe they're tied. But I'd go with His Holiness. This is a pope we've been longing for, for a long time. AGES, in fact.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
33. I would have to agree. Although Pope Francis certainly has the potential of having an even greater
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 05:12 AM
Dec 2013

impact than Edward Snowden. But certainly Mr. Snowden has raised an issue and pushed it to the center of public debate that no one else has even come close to doing. As Alex Pareene of salon.com put it in the title of the July 22, 2013 article, Crazy traitor leaker got Congress to notice vast surveillance state http://www.salon.com/2013/07/22/crazy_traitor_leaker_got_congress_to_notice_vast_surveillance_state/

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
41. Snowden? The coward who gave state secrets to Beijing & Moscow? Aw fuck. =(
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:06 PM
Dec 2013

In any case, even though I greatly respect Pope Francis, and of course, our President, as well as a developing respect for the new leader of Iran.....I feel that this reward ultimately should have gone to none other than the recently departed Madiba. Now *he* was a *true* hero; Snowden has nothing on him. Nothing.

R.I.P. Nelson Mandela, aka Madiba. You were a true inspiration to us all.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
49. I'd say it's between him and Pope Francis.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:40 PM
Dec 2013

Both have ruffled quite a few feathers. But Francis has more of a broad-based appeal. Outside DU there are still millions of folks who think Edward Snowden is Frosty's brother.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
61. Well, for starters he's Volunteer scum
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 03:44 PM
Dec 2013

and if that wasn't bad enough, he's now Bronco scum so he deserves the double death...

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
56. I doubt he will get it but it would be an interesting choice.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:57 PM
Dec 2013

I really am not sure who I would pick.

Response to Logical (Original post)

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
74. I agree. And I think he's a spineless douchebag
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 08:27 PM
Dec 2013

it's how big of an impact someone had. Not a lionization of the person.

gulliver

(13,186 posts)
75. Snowden did cause a noteworthy amount of damage.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 08:56 PM
Dec 2013

I just don't think Snowden's crimes rise to the level of fiendishness needed to "out-impact" the good of Pope Francis. Worldwide, I'm thinking Time will likely go with Francis. They can fill their pages with his travels, his photos with the needy and physically ailing, and quotes from his speeches and writings. Francis is looking like a serious game changer in world religion. Snowden's 15 minutes are pretty much up.

BeyondGeography

(39,377 posts)
76. Until Pope Francis ramped it up, there was actually a case for Snowy
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 09:08 PM
Dec 2013

Mostly because of weak competition. But global inequality and the destructive tyranny of the uber-rich is a much bigger issue than the state-abetted loss of privacy in the digital age, which inflames cushy couch potatoes more than anyone.

And he's the Pope, fercryinoutloud, meaning he has the potential to change the direction of an institution that still matters in the world, and change it for the better. It's really not much of a contest. Snowden's revelations will re-calibrate policy in mostly imperceptible ways; Pope Francis is Occupy Wall Street with a global platform.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
77. What? No al-Sisi?
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 09:31 PM
Dec 2013

He had better backing on the net than Miley Cyrus did!




How Egypt’s Gen. al-Sisi Won TIME’s Person of the Year Poll


...
When TIME announced on Thursday that Egypt’s Defense Minister, Gen. Abdul Fattah al-Sisi, had topped TIME’s 2013 Person of the Year poll with more than 440,000 votes his supporters were triumphant. Ahmed Abu Hashima, an Egyptian steel magnate and Sisi supporter, was one of the first to publicly congratulate Sisi on Twitter. Writing in Arabic, he called the victory an, “appreciation for (Sisi's) national role and the love of Egyptians towards him.”

Sisi’s success reflected the genuine popularity of a man who led what was essentially a military coup in July against the democratically elected government of then President Mohammed Morsi. Sisi remains the most powerful political figure in Egypt. The win was driven by hundreds of thousands of votes from inside Egypt; the country of about 85 million provided more votes than more populous nations like India and the United States. Many of those voters came via websites like Alwafd.org, one of the several Egyptian news portals that drove voters to the poll. These included youm7.com and el-balad.com. These sites tracked the voting throughout the week and informed readers when voting would close and how close the gap was between Sisi and the person who came second, Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

TIME’s Person of the Year is chosen by the magazine’s editors and will be announced on Wednesday, Dec. 11. Part of the Sisi vote may have been driven by a desire among his supporters to sway the editors’ decision. An article earlier this week in El-Balad linked to the online poll page and asked, “Would (the editors) listen to Egyptian votes and select their Defense Minister as the man of the year for 2013 so his picture could be printed on the cover of the world’s most famous magazine in its annual issue?”.....“This doesn’t tell us anything that Egyptians did not already know. But perhaps it is a good time for the whole world to see it clearly,” he said.

In less than a year Sisi has become a household name with his face appearing on T-shirts, banners and chocolates. But the true level of his popularity can only be tested at the voting booth. Speculation as to his intentions has been a media obsession in Egypt for months. The elections are set for sometime in the first half of 2014, pending ratification of a new constitution.........




Read more: How Egypt’s Gen. al-Sisi Won TIME’s Person of the Year Poll | TIME.com http://poy.time.com/2013/12/06/how-egypts-gen-al-sisi-won-times-person-of-the-year-poll/#ixzz2n7pH2pgz

moondust

(20,002 posts)
78. I doubt they would give it to Snowden.
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 09:39 PM
Dec 2013

Because as a person he's a one-hit wonder, a flash in the pan. All he did was steal a bunch of other people's work and publicize it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"NO CONTEST: EDWARD ...