Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Morning Dew

(6,539 posts)
4. And in that spirit, MN pukes will figure a way to make voting against it mean voting for it.
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:23 PM
Mar 2012

Props to whoever came up with the idea (unionworks, maybe?) of calling it a SCAB law.

RTW state = Scab state.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
3. Sorry, where does it give what the amendment says?
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:17 PM
Mar 2012

Is it a constitutional amendment prohibiting the right to work?

Omaha Steve

(99,703 posts)
5. Right to work means you don't have to belong to a union in your workplace
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:24 PM
Mar 2012

http://www.aflcio.org/Legislation-and-Politics/State-Legislative-Battles/Ongoing-State-Legislative-Attacks/Right-to-Work-for-Less

Extremist groups, right-wing politicians and their corporate backers want to weaken the power of workers and their unions through so-called right to work for less laws. Their efforts are a partisan political ploy that undermines the basic rights of workers. By making unions weaker, these laws lower wages and living standards for all workers in the state. In fact, workers in states with these laws earn an average of $5,538 less a year than workers in other states. “Right to work” for less is closer to the truth.
Check It Out

Click here for an AFL-CIO fact sheet on "right to work" for less.
Right to Work is Wrong for Everyone, American Rights at Work fact sheet

patrice

(47,992 posts)
6. I know that. What I don't know is what the amendment proposes in regards to right to work.
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:16 PM
Mar 2012

To ban right to work?
To make it the law?
Something else?

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
7. Against. If "right to work" means the law letting people cross union lines. I think they SHOULD
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:21 PM
Mar 2012

be able to cross union lines, in some instances, but I don't think that should be a constitutional amendment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll: Would you vote for ...