Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
1. Probably Ryan
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 02:36 PM
Dec 2013

With a little assistance from Senator Patty Murray(D)...and the rest of that group of useless meat puppets!!!

rainy

(6,092 posts)
2. With the few republicans being paraded on TV
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 02:40 PM
Dec 2013

speaking against the cuts it gives the impression that it is the democrats' doing. Of courts the hosts don't ask.

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
4. It doesn't really matter.. it's a bipartisan bill...
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 04:28 PM
Dec 2013

I can tell you that I will be looking at the Yes votes, in the house and the Senate, and every person on that list will lose my support.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
7. Do you realize the alternative was a continuing resolution ( if the Republicans would vote for it)
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 04:37 PM
Dec 2013

that would have likely gone at the sequester limit - with deeper cuts? That or having another dept ceiling crisis.

The way to stop these stupid austerity moves is to regain the House in 2014.

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
9. I'll take that over broken promises made by the White House...
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 05:07 PM
Dec 2013

No cuts to current retirees and active duty retain the same benefits.

IOW the deal we were promised when we signed up...

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
15. You are in the Army and just now realize they break their promises???
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 06:44 PM
Dec 2013

I feel sorry for you if you believed anything they ever told you...

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
14. Not really - they need to consider the alternative
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 05:44 PM
Dec 2013

There will almost never be an important complex bill where a legislator will agree with each and every provision. Should he/she vote no on everything else --- in which case NOTHING will ever pass.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
17. Obviously, politics is the art of the possible...
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 07:46 PM
Dec 2013

But that said, it's amazing what becomes IMPOSSIBLE when one never even tries. Even when we held the House, Senate, and White House we were told it wasn't enough, they needed mega-super majorities across the board or there was no point trying. Nope, without a super-duper-majority there is nothing for it but to pass Republican proposals.

So no, I have no confidence in my party or this administration. I trust that they will fuck the poor at every opportunity, I trust that they will continue to push and pass tax cuts for the affluent and service cuts for the needy, I trust that they will continue to expand the spy state and advance the police state, I trust that drone murders will continue, I trust that given half a chance the Obama Administration will destroy Social Security with the chained CPI system the bankers love so much. And I trust that at even step the party leadership will go right along with it.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
5. I suspect it was in the sequester
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 04:33 PM
Dec 2013

The budget fixed some but not all of the things cut by the sequester. It would be a great idea to NOW put in an amendment eliminating those cuts -- without cutting something else. (In the budget itself they had agreed to a top line number and fighting that would have required making it up.)

I think not extending unemployment is worse.

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
10. Extensions to the safety net need to go...
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 05:09 PM
Dec 2013

... Before reductions are made in actual earned benefits.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
16. Red versus Blue is rarely the relevant issue anymore.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 06:51 PM
Dec 2013

Corporatists live in both parties now, and Red versus Blue is used primarily as a tool to keep us divided, hating the Other Team, excusing terrible policy when it's enabled by our side, and reluctant to unite against the ones who are impoverishing ALL of us.

The relevant battle is between the corporatists/One Percent and the rest of us.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What party is responsible...