Good Poor, Bad Poor
By TIMOTHY EGAN
snip:
I met a wheat farmer not long ago in Montana whose family operation was getting nearly $300,000 a year in federal subsidies. With his crop in, this wealthy farmer was looking forward to spending a month in Hawaii. No one suggested that he pass a drug test to continue receiving his sizable handout, or that he be cut off cold, and encouraged to grow something that taxpayers wouldnt have to subsidize.
One person deserves the handout, the other does not. But these distinctions are colored by your circumstances where you stand depends on where you sit.
When a million Irish died during the Great Famine of the 1850s, many in the English aristocracy said the peasants deserved to starve because their families were too big and indolent. The British baronet overseeing food relief felt that the famine was Gods judgment, and an excellent way to get rid of surplus population. His argument on relief was the same one used by Rand Paul.
The only way to prevent the people from becoming habitually dependent on government is to bring the operation to a close, Sir Charles Trevelyan said about the relief plan at a time when thousands of Irish a day were dropping dead from hunger.
more
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/20/opinion/egan-good-poor-bad-poor.html?_r=2&