Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 06:03 AM Dec 2013

Robert Reich Takes On Ryan Adviser Who Claims Income Inequality Is Not A Problem

http://crooksandliars.com/2013/12/robert-reich-takes-ryan-adviser-who-claims

Here we go again with another one of these Third Way flacks making their way onto our airways -- although this one has moved onto the Manhattan Institute and working as an economic adviser for Rep. Paul Ryan. From this Friday's The PBS Newshour, former Labor Secretary Robert Reich joined Scott Winship to discuss the expiration of unemployment benefits and " mounting concerns over inequality and lack of opportunity."

To no one's surprise given his background, Mr. Winship did his best to try to convince the viewers that lack of upward mobility and record income disparity in the United States is really no big deal.

Business Insider ran a piece on Winship last month, who is apparently working on some big plan that's supposed to be unveiled this spring, and surprise, surprise, he's a big fan of "entitlement reform" a.k.a. gutting our retirements and earned benefits, and he really likes tax cuts, vouchers and the earned income tax credit as opposed to increasing the minimum wage; or in other words, the same trickle-down economics conservatives have been pushing that haven't worked for decades now. You can read that entire article here: Meet The Man Who Wants To Help Paul Ryan Solve Poverty.

ROBERT REICH: Well, besides slower economic growth -- and I do think the studies predominantly do show that -- and, intuitively, it's obvious -- beyond that, you have a kind of corruption and eroding of our democracy. When more and more money accumulates at the very top, so does, inevitably, political power. As the great American jurist Louis Brandeis once said, we can have a great deal of money in the hands of a few people, or we can have a democracy, but we can't have both, because money inevitably of that degree, as in the late 19th century, now, does corrupt and undermine with lobbying and campaign contributions our democracy.



More, inluding video, at the link.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Reich Takes On Ryan Adviser Who Claims Income Inequality Is Not A Problem (Original Post) Scuba Dec 2013 OP
k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Dec 2013 #1
I'm with her! K & R. nt arthritisR_US Dec 2013 #3
du rec. xchrom Dec 2013 #2
It's not a problem. Turbineguy Dec 2013 #4
Reading the interview with Scott Winship makes me vomit. rgbecker Dec 2013 #5
This guy is an idiot Gothmog Dec 2013 #6

Turbineguy

(37,343 posts)
4. It's not a problem.
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 09:22 AM
Dec 2013

When you are a republican, problems are not problems if they are other peoples' problems. Now if your fantasy economic theories don't work in the real world, that's a problem. But the fix for that is to alter reality and you have Fox News and RW Hate Radio to help you.

rgbecker

(4,832 posts)
5. Reading the interview with Scott Winship makes me vomit.
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 09:43 AM
Dec 2013
http://www.businessinsider.com/scott-winship-2013-11

"On the right, where boldness is required, is telling people that we can’t continue to spend the amount that we’ve committed to the future and that there are going to have to be sacrifices. The Chairman (Paul Ryan) has been admirably bold in really being upfront about that message. I really admired his entitlement reform proposals.

Ultimately, I think it’s important both politically but more importantly, substantively, for the right to offer something positive to the poor and middle class and to have some element of a mobility opportunity agenda that does offer them something from the federal government. That’s tricky because conservatives admirably worry about perverse incentives. It’s really easy to reduce poverty if you just give cash to people but obviously, that causes people to work less. It causes them to behave irresponsibly in other ways. Quite rightly, conservatives have been trying to figure out how you deal with this problem of perverse incentives.

The other thing that I think conservatives emphasize admirably is that we spend a lot of money on social programs that are intended to promote mobility and a lot of them there’s just no evidence at all that they make much of a difference."


But he concludes the interview with this: "It’s an interesting idea. I do think it’s dangerous to give everybody a minimum income without any strings attached. On top of that, I think it’s interesting to think about giving workers a guaranteed income, which is kind of what the earned income tax credit does. I think it would be a good idea for are workers who are married parents rather than unmarried parents to receive something of a bonus or an incentive in the same way – maybe there’s a different guaranteed minimum income for them. In some ways, it is a compelling approach. A guaranteed minimum income for workers is certainly appealing."

I guess in the end, its all about the "Glory of True Love".


Gothmog

(145,321 posts)
6. This guy is an idiot
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 01:58 PM
Dec 2013

I hate these idiots who keep preaching the theory that tax cuts cure all problems.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Reich Takes On Rya...