Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bhikkhu

(10,718 posts)
1. The sentiment is good, but the facts are all screwy in that
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 08:55 PM
Mar 2012

...batching dissimilar types of information as if they were equivalent is disingenuous, and one of the things I find most objectionable when the other side does it. Another is making claims without providing sufficient information to verify those claims. What years are we talking about, for instance? Are they the same years for all of the companies?

Unfortunately, it is very easy to misconstrue financial reports. I can say that the claim about GE is a commonly repeated internet myth, which I looked into myself at one point. They have paid about 15% in corporate taxes on their net income, on average, over the last decade. I'm guessing the others do about the same - which is very low and makes the supposed actual tax rate kind of a joke.

So I agree with any claim that loopholes and such need tightened up and large corporations should be paying the actual rate, but manufacturing faulty information about it doesn't get us there, and just makes people look silly or strident.

bhikkhu

(10,718 posts)
3. Looking at the page (which has no place for comments) -
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 10:07 PM
Mar 2012

I think one problem is that they list three sources for information - Suntimes.com, Wikipedia, and CNN.

The best place to find actual financial statements - usually independently audited and vetted by the SEC, is in the yearly statements to corporate shareholders. These are public information when the companies are public, and will give the information on taxes paid. For GE, as an example, their statements are at http://www.ge.com/investors/financial_reporting/annual_reports.html , and the tax information for any given year will be in a chapter titled "Audited Financial Statements", in the Statement of Earnings report. 2011, again as an example, lists 20.098 billion in earning before taxes, then lists 5.732 billion as the taxes on income for that year.

If journalists reliably looked at and understood the primary information before they wrote stories, then they'd be a good source for information too.

 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
5. I'll go with audited financials in the annual reports, Form 10K's, etc.
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 10:30 PM
Mar 2012

I've lost faith in honest reporting from either side of the political spectrum. GE has been excoriated by the left for paying no taxes in recent years, but no one mentions they had had big operating losses that carried forward from prior years. Leaving that out is not honest reporting.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
6. I suppose operating costs are honestly reported, like my own deductions....!
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 10:36 PM
Mar 2012

I hope one day soon we can get down to a one bibles length long tax code instead of the seven that we have now......

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
7. As a tax CPA who prepares taxes for financial statements for a Fortune 500 Co., I can concur
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 10:45 PM
Mar 2012

For instance, people blasted YUM for paying to taxes a couple years ago. I found this odd and read their annual report on the SEC's EDGAR database and easily saw what happened:

Companies incur pension expense every year. However, for income tax purposes, they do not get an income tax deduction until a contribution to the pension trust is made. YUM had been incurring pension expenses for years without getting a tax deduction. When you looked at their income tax rate, it includes current income taxes (what they owe this year) and deferred income taxes (what they will owe in the future on items that are treated differently for income tax purposes than for GAAP).

In the year in question, YUM made a HUGE pension contribution. Their income tax rate did not change, as the combination of current and deferred income taxes yields a relatively steady rate. HOwever, in that year, they had ZERO current income tax expense because they finally got a pension deduction on their income tax return. Instead, all their taxes were reported as deferred income taxes because of this reversal. People were screaming that YUM paid zero in CURRENT income taxes. The reality is that the company would have LOVED to have gotten those pension deductions years earlier. Instead, they actually had to pay MORE in taxes in those earlier years and not get the benenfit for years. Thus, people were bitching about the company have to pay MORE in taxes in earlier years.

In short, agenda driven people flat out lied to push their agenda. Thus, I too approach these things with skepticism because they prey on the fact that anyone other than a tax CPA would have no idea if they are lying or not.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
8. There was a study done some years back where they gave 10 CPA's one individuals tax return...
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 11:08 PM
Mar 2012

and got 10 different answers.....the system is incredulously rigged.....to the benefit of those that know how to work it.....

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
10. The concept of deferred taxes and the deductibility of pension expense is pretty clear
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 11:36 PM
Mar 2012

I agree that it is overly complex. I fully support them streamlining the process the day after I retire. That said, that complexity is EXACTLY what many of these articles are relying on.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
12. You can put the tin foil hat back on
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 11:52 PM
Mar 2012

I love my job and, quite frankly, am damn good at what I do. I love any opportunity I can get to teach people and educate them on something that can be complex. It is clear you have ZERO desire to learn anything and are more interested in just parroting conspiracy theories. Good luck with that...

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
13. Thank you, my tin foil hat is placed firmly on my head.....and I do not believe the Wizard....
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 12:31 AM
Mar 2012

Last edited Thu Mar 15, 2012, 01:13 AM - Edit history (1)

REALITY is better than any conspiracy,

IE: present day stock market.... http://www.democraticunderground.com/101619394 ......

and others, http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002420506 , http://www.democraticunderground.com/125121796

I apologize for assuming that you drink alcohol.....it has been my experience that the cognitive dissonance that CPA's endure leads to substance use.....not necessarily abuse....



I am the one in the tin foil hat....

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
9. If companies voluntarily paid more tax than they needed to,
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 11:16 PM
Mar 2012

they would be opening themselves up to shareholder lawsuits. For example, Carnival is incorporated in Panama, and its low tax rate is perfectly legal. Kind of like how people living in New Hampshire pay less income tax than people in California.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»10 Companies that pay lit...