Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDetroit To Seek Judge’s Approval For Improved Deal With Big Banks
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/12/26/3104241/detroit-revised-banks-deal/Detroits high-priced bankruptcy lawyers think a revised deal that pays large banks almost 60 cents on the dollar will win approval from the judge who rejected a previous arrangement that was even more generous to the banks.
The deal in question relates to $300 million in loans the city has to pay back to UBS and Bank of America. Emergency manager Kevyn Orr originally wanted to pay UBS and Bank of America roughly $230 million between 75 and 82 cents on the dollar, according to The Bond Buyer in a deal that U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes rejected. At $165 million, the new deal is cheaper for the city, but that is no guarantee of Rhodes approval as the judges objections seemed to have more to do with the process than the price. Rhodes said the city made the deal with a gun to its head, and insisted that Detroit and the two banks not only renegotiate the terms of the deal but that they return to his courtroom prepared to show in detail how any deal with the banks is better for the city than its alternative, which is to sue to get the loans canceled outright.
While $300 million may seem minuscule next to a total of $18 billion in unpayable debts, this deal is central to the citys bankruptcy plan. When Detroit made the loans in question it promised to use revenue from area casinos as a last resort repayment mechanism in the event of a default. Now bankrupt, the city needs that casino money to finance basic services and operations in the short term, making the resolution of this debt a high priority for Orr and his $28 million team of consultants and lawyers.
Because the debt is attached to that collateral, the megabanks are considered secured creditors and are therefore legally entitled to get a somewhat better deal than the citys unsecured creditors, a category which includes more than 20,000 retirees who depend upon the modest pensions they were promised. Orr has proposed paying retirees about 16 cents on the dollar of what the city owes them, and has announced that retiree health insurance plans will be canceled in the new year.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 671 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Detroit To Seek Judge’s Approval For Improved Deal With Big Banks (Original Post)
xchrom
Dec 2013
OP
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)1. 60% for banks, 16% for pensions
This is the kind of thing that Democrats should be running on all across the country. A perfect microcosm of our system. Add in that the pensions were supposed to be protected by our State Constitution, and there you have it. The exact thing that even The Pope is now speaking out against.
arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)3. +2! nt
mstinamotorcity2
(1,451 posts)4. Funny you have that areial shot.
65,000 of the 80,000 abandoned properties in Detroit are owned by the banks. These properties have been allowed to become the model for Detroit is a broke city.