General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGawker: This Chart Shows Why Sunday Talk Shows Suck
<snip>
"Steve Benen of MSNBC figured out all the politicos who've been on serious grownup important Sunday political talk shows more than 10 times in 2013. His colored chart points out that they're nearly all Republicans. But it holds some other angry-making conclusions he didn't highlight.
Benen tallied appearances on "Meet the Press," "Face the Nation," "This Week," "State of the Union," and "Fox News Sunday," concluding that "Sunday shows love Republicans... 10 of the top 13 [guests] are Republicans, as are six of the top seven."
It's a data point, sure. But partisan headcounts mean more to Beltway "WIN THE DAY" scorekeepers than most home viewers. Here are some more telling insights from Benen's chart:
There is precisely one woman on the list, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), who famously voted against enforcement of equal-pay laws for women because it would place a "lot of additional burdens" on "job creators."
There are no men or women of color on the list, unless you count Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), whose father is Cuban, and who has attacked Democrats as "always willing to play the race card."
http://gawker.com/this-chart-shows-why-sunday-talk-shows-suck-1491625630
Liberal media, my @#$!
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Network Program Total Viewers A25-54
CBS
Face the Nation 3.31M 1.02M
ABC
This Week 2.86M 806K
NBC Meet the Press 2.77M 819K
FOX Fox News Sunday 1.30M 509K
Univision Al Punto 638K 245K
10.878 million folks watching cable news sunday talk blah blah blah---
330 million people in the country---
Math Works LOL
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)and Republicans claim the Lord as belonging to them so why are they not in church??!!
Cha
(297,304 posts)are the results.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)What has a majority or anything close to it? Nothing. The 10.9 million people roughly is close to the number of people in this country who are seriously interested in politics.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)And Durbin expressed his support for Chained CPI. So......
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)The MSM won't allow a peep out of an actual liberal to be heard on TV. It might give the people ideas. They hate us for our freedoms.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)I'm stealing that, just in time for New Year's with the family. Thank you!
Journeyman
(15,036 posts)I've no doubt I'm better for it. Just think of all the blithering idiocy I've been spared.
Cha
(297,304 posts)math. And, I had watched for only two years before that. Just during the bush-Gore era. I only got into politics in 1999.
I applaud the idiocy you've been spared.. as well as my own!
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Freaking corporate media is a total wasteland of Republicon propaganda.
riqster
(13,986 posts)And Rec.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)calimary
(81,313 posts)Nice to have some proof! Thanks for posting this, Scurrilous!
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)orbitalman
(1,098 posts)I can't stomach these show, at all.
MsPithy
(809 posts)I am too busy checking DU for Sunday LOLcats!
Uncle Joe
(58,365 posts)I don't watch them anymore and I used to be an avid viewer.
Thanks for the thread,
Hamlette
(15,412 posts)is the last line of the article.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)but not necessarily how it sucks. The thing that shows the suckiness of Sunday talk would elaborate on how much misinformation is spread, and how much time is devoted to trivial topics in contrast to topics that affect the lives of many people.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Whereas I used to look forward to the Sunday morning shows. They are all just White House and opposition party talking points, nothing more. I grew tired of it.
Stuart G
(38,434 posts)nyquil_man
(1,443 posts)It's Meet David Gregory, a prospect about as exciting as watching linoleum peel. Come to think of it, that might explain why the guests are mostly old men.
MurrayDelph
(5,299 posts)they couldn't just call "Meet the incompetent right-wing hack."
mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)Poll: Low ratings, high expectations for GOP in 2014
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/12/13/usa-today-pew-poll-shows-low-ratings-high-expectations-for-gop-in-2014/4001317/
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Fox will gleefully explain they are closer to 2 to 1 to offer fair and balanced proof. That ignores it should be 1 to 1 and that their host is openly partisan so it ends up being 3 to 1.
When called on this the Networks will explain they are offering the power out of party a chance to promote their views, of course when Republicans are in control they change the story to the party in power is creating the policy so they are newsworthy.
Marr
(20,317 posts)I've watched the same *person* make those two opposing statements within a couple of years, and not even bat an eyelash.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Or was it Shiefer? I have seen both make variations of the statements.
Bigmack
(8,020 posts)... intended to explore topics.
They are meant as an adjunct to Fox News(?) and the RW noise machine.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Was Manchin there to talk about energy policy? He's from West Virginia and says what the coal mine owners tell him to say.
Was Schumer there to talk about the Middle East? He's one of those sponsoring legislation aimed at undermining President Obama's peace initiatives. Or was he talking about why we should help Wall Street bankers steal our savings?
Durbin is the majority whip and will say whatever the White House wants him to say, whether it's about foreign policy (where I approve of the President's peace initiative) or health care (on which the President gets a good grade) or about domestic spying or the Trans-Pacific Partnership, where the President doesn't receive such high marks (at least not from me).
Crowman1979
(3,844 posts)Like any consumer is going to use those products. Give me a break! It's more like a f*** you to the taxpayer. They may as well just flip us off and moon everybody on there ads. Because it has the same effect.
Marr
(20,317 posts)It's a bit overt, isn't it? It's pretty much a clear statement to the effect of, "we've purchased this show". Considering the fact that, as you mentioned, they don't sell consumer products and don't advertise direct to the consumer anywhere else on television, it's almost ludicrously transparent.
spanone
(135,844 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)He never seems to come up on DU. How come he is on Sunday TV more than anyone else?
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Seems to be the go-to-guy for all things Snowden.
Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)Cha
(297,304 posts)in red and blue. And, look at the blues.. small kind blue.
I use to read Benen everyday when he was at the POlitical Animal blog.. he was always bringing up McCain's overkill on Sunday. "If it's Sunday it must be John McCain on gasbag shows." Or something like that.
This should be plastered all over the net! In fact I'm going to put it on my FB page.
Thanks Scurrilous!
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Cha
(297,304 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)ABC, CBS, NBC, & PBS all had the same big news:
anti-bacterial soap.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)1. Repeat Republican talking points as truth ad nauseum (i.e. Obamacare, Benghazi, etc.).
2. Take a push poll regarding Republican talking point.
3. Discuss President's bad poll numbers based on news media's poor reporting and Republican lies.
1. Take a poll asking a broad and vague question like "Is the country headed in the right direction?". Not a specific question about a certain policy mind you, just any question guaranteed to generate a negative response.
2. Ask Democratic guest why they going against the grain when America is rejecting liberalism and Democratic/Presidential policies as if that's what poll respondents were saying when in fact they may having been indicating policies are not liberal enough. (This was done over and over again with Obamacare. Ask people if they are happy with Obamacare then count people who want a public option or single payer with the knuckle dragging mouth breathers who want no reform at at all.)
1. Hold Democrats responsible for Republican obstructionism. (If Republican version of compromise is Democrat complete surrender then Democrats should surrender completely or be accused of not comprising).
1. Have no standard what so ever regarding accuracy of pundit policy positions. You can have a track record of outstandingly bad policy predictions such as the Iraq War and never ever be called on it.
1. False equivalency. No matter how inappropriate compare minor bureaucratic mishaps to major f*ck ups that cost thousands of lives by continually trying to inject phrases like "mission accomplished" and "Katrina moment" into events that have nothing more in common than they happened on planet Earth. (Why not just refer to Ed Wood's "Plan 9 from Outer Space" as his "Citizen Kane" moment?)
arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)for that very reason. I got fed up with the stacked representation.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Why not start posting there again?
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I refuse to watch these programs. They are nothing but pure propaganda. And any "Democrat" that appears on these programs is hardly worthy of our support. There might be the rare exception.