Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For those following the news about the WV chemical spill (Original Post) theHandpuppet Jan 2014 OP
The Charleston Gazette is a fine newspaper. Lasher Jan 2014 #1
Very interesting story about the lack of emergency plans LiberalEsto Jan 2014 #2
+1 Earth_First Jan 2014 #3
Yep. This should serve as a warning to everyone theHandpuppet Jan 2014 #4
 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
2. Very interesting story about the lack of emergency plans
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jan 2014

Unfortunately for all of us, the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act has in cases been overridden by the Department of Homeland Security in recent years.

People can no longer find out what chemicals and other materials are stored at places like chemical plants and utility companies near their homes because of the specter of terrorist attacks.

I feel sure that this gives a lot of sites a very convenient loophole from the Right to Know Act.

This is an old article, from 2002, but it lays out the conflict between security and the public's right to know about hazards.


Information Resilience and Homeland Security
Richard Forno, 2002-05-09

http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/80

"For example, chemical plants and nuclear power facilities removed ‘sensitive’ reports and documentation about public health, environmental safety, and facility security from their websites, allegedly to preclude a terrorist from obtaining information for malicious purposes. Absent many such reports, how will the public, watchdog groups, or regulatory or enforcement agencies be able to monitor for potential problems that affect the public? The fear here is that, under the guise of ‘national security’ the government is actually allowing corporations to avoid scrutiny by and accountability to the taxpaying public that is, in effect, paying for the critical infrastructures."

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
4. Yep. This should serve as a warning to everyone
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 01:57 PM
Jan 2014

We don't even know what we don't know... if you know what I mean.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For those following the n...