If you're watching the Nye / Ham debate, here's a useful tool...

[X_Digger]

https://bingobaker.com/view/201183

[haikugal]

1. Good one!!

Well it's about to start I guess….I think highly of Nye but can't imagine his purpose in doing this.

on edit…
I just noticed your screen name…I have to say some of our Aussie imports have been a detriment in my view. I became aware of the Aussie cristofascists fairly recently…most aren't religious. My Mum was Australian and not religious...

[hlthe2b]

2. where are you watching them?

[X_Digger]

4. Here ya go..

http://debatelive.org/

[hlthe2b]

7. thank you (though listening to that fundy nut may be more than I can take)

[X_Digger]

8. Turn the bingo card into a drinking game, and it helps. :)

[pangaia]

10. Thanks for the link,

but I listened to that lunatic for about 5 minutes and just couldn't stomach any more. The guy needs help.

[X_Digger]

11. I waiting for Bill to smack him down. n/t

[IDemo]

3. Nye must be winning

The Devil has blacked out the YouTube feed.

&feature=share

[Coexist]

5. the next 30 minutes are the creation theory and evidence

should be lovely

http://debatelive.org

[X_Digger]

6. Yeah, check off lots of spots on the bingo card. :) n/t

[hvn_nbr_2]

9. "The speed of light has decreased over time"

I never heard that one. Where do they get that and what is is it supposed to prove?

[TlalocW]

12. It means the universe isn't as old as it seems

If light from a far-off star takes millions of years to get to Earth, that's a problem since everything is just over 6000 years old so light used to be a lot faster, meaning it probably only used to take maybe hundreds of years to get here.

TlalocW

[pangaia]

13. ???

[hvn_nbr_2]

14. OMG! Well, I guess that beats...

"Those stars don't really exist. God just put that light there, already on the way to earth, to test the faith of scientists."

[Johonny]

15. From the "measurements" of light

they are apparently unaware of scientific error. It's one of those bad ideas that someone thought up and it spread to the stupid that need crap to fill book volumes. Within error there is no evidence that the speed of light has decreased and more to the point it is empirically derived these days absolutely so oops on that whole idea.

Its funny they use really bad science data when they need it, throw good data away and pretend it isn't there when they don't.