General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney To Women Voters: ‘Vote For The Other Guy’ If You Want Greater Access To Birth Control
Yes, he actually said this.http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/20/1075916/-Romney-to-Women-You-Want-Birth-Control-Vote-for-the-Other-Guy-
...........................
Romney To Women Voters: Vote For The Other Guy If You Want Greater Access To Birth Control
By Igor Volsky on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:30 am
Mitt Romney found himself in hot water over his opposition to expanding womens access to contraception, less than a week after suggesting that he would get rid of Planned Parenthood, among other programs, to reduce the deficit. During a town hall in Illinois Monday evening, the former Massachusetts governor told a voter to vote for the other guy if she wanted access to free birth control and said that the federal government should not subsidize womens health care through Planned Parenthood:
Q: Im just wondering where you would suggest that the millions of women who receive their health services, such as mammograms, and HPV vaccines go?
ROMNEY: Well, they could go wherever theyd like to go this is a free society. But here is what I say, which is the federal government should not tax these people to pay for Planned Parenthood. There are a lot of things that we have in our society that we may like, that we might not like, but that government should not be paying for.
VIDEO & MORE:
&feature=player_embedded
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/03/20/447919/romney-vote-for-other-guy-contraception/?mobile=nc
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,815 posts)DLevine
(1,788 posts)Johonny
(20,878 posts)of happiness huh Mitt?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Keep digging.
no_hypocrisy
(46,158 posts)Certainly not Santorum or Gingrich.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Which 'other guy'? Ron Paul? Barak Obama? Certainly not Santorum or Gingrich."
...Ron Paul either: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002377092
He also supports forced vaginal probes: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002161152
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)I never understood why his followers are trying to portray him as some "fringe, progressive" Republican when that bigoted demagogue Darwinist is actually much worse on economic AND social issues than any mainstream Repub running.
to his credit he did predict the economic collapse 10 years before it happened
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)it was my first time ever talking to one, I swear I walked away with a massive migraine! Someone needs to publish a manual on how to deal with them...UGH!
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)I'm especially dumbfounded on the whole "anti-corporatist" tag. How does "Economic Darwinism" (which has always benefitted the wealthy above all) = "anti-corporatist"?? How does straight-up eliminating the social safety net help the worker in any way?
Up really IS "down".
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)He's cooked his own goose.
He's well done.
They write themselves.
tdb63
(73 posts)nykym
(3,063 posts)election ad for the democrats!
Mariana
(14,860 posts)I honestly didn't think the repukes were quite this stupid. I was wrong.
nykym
(3,063 posts)Moderator: On the subject of contraception......
Romney: If you want contraception vote for the other guy
President Obama: Thanks Mitt, a vote for me gets you....
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)get the red out
(13,468 posts)Thanks for the advice though!
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,156 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,470 posts)izquierdista
(11,689 posts)He's going to go down in history as the 21st century version of Wendell Willkie -- there had to be an election, and everyone knew he had to lose, so he says stuff just to make it go according to script.
yodermon
(6,143 posts)the man is a full self-parody at this point.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)a montage of all the whackadoodle things Rmoney says. Assuming he gets the nomination.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)you've just given me more enthusiasm for doing so.
Arrogant prick!!!
Response to kpete (Original post)
tdb63 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Yes, Mitt and GOP freaks....we will vote for the "other guy" who will protect our reproductive rights and access to it and provide there is equity and protection.
Just remember....Women outvote men and you will be voted out.....way, way out....
This war on women is going to be the nail in your political coffin.....
Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)Let's give 'em what they want.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)But this really sealed it for me, Mitt.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,281 posts)DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)otherwise his anti-women campaign platform would appear to be INSANE! Oh wait.....