General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUPDATE: Laser "Haas v Romney" Racketeer - Emergency - File 2nd Amended Complaint
Last edited Thu Feb 6, 2014, 01:14 PM - Edit history (1)
We are 110 days into my lawsuit against Romney & his RICO gang.
On October 18, 2013, yours truly sued Mitt Romney, Bain Capital, Goldman Sachs and cohorts (such as Paul Traub) for Racketeering - in Los Angeles Division of Federal District Court. There are several stories out there and a cheap video. Please see (here) - (here) - (here) - and video link (here).
A new case order was issued and then several events happened. We had a victory of one reporter who was punished to the tune of $2 million, for reporting crimes; and failing to handle the issue correctly. Crystal Cox won a reversal (that a Blogger is entitled to "Freedom of the Press" protection). Then, in another case we were working on (brutal - Fullerton Police Beating -) of homeless man Kelly Thomas; the jury ruled that 6 cops, tazing a 150lb guy (NOT on drugs) until the battery ran out and then turning the tazer over and beating him brain dead; was not unnessary use of force.
So, I've been somewhat despondent for a few weeks.
Getting back to Romney the Racketeer, most people misunderstand RICO and think that ONLY the Department of Justice can prosecute bad guys under the RICO Act of 1970. Actually it's the other way around. The DOJ is forbidden by law to prosecute Civil RICO under a specific provision of Racketeering as per 18 U.S.C. $ 1964(c). Whereas, the law is - you and I, Mr. & Mrs. Ordinary Gals/Guys, are the one's who can prosecute organized criminals under RICO section 1964(c). (See Wikipedia - here). Specifically, if your state and/or federal government are "bought off" and/or "willfully blind" to systematic organized crimes; then you and I may become "Private Attorney Generals".
That's what I am in this "Haas v Romney" case - a "Private Attorney General".
[br][hr][br]
ROMNEY the RACKETEER - Story - In a Nutshell
What happened is Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital, Mitt Romney and their lawyers (Paul Traub & www.MNAT.com) have been engaging in Racketeering for decades. (See the pic above, showing that there's NO 6 degrees of separation; because Romney is directly linked to all of it. Including Marc Dreier fraud, Stanford (through son Tagg Romney) and Tom Petters Ponzi.
These Racketeers have been able to get away with it; because Romney's "retroactive" time span is directly tied to the former Wilmington, DE United States Attorney. In 1999 - thru 2001 - there were organized crimes committed against The Learning Co, Stage Stores, Kay Bee and eToys between 1999 and August 2001. Billions was stolen; but NO prosecution occurred.
That is because Romney possessed his very own U.S. Attorney (Colm Connolly).
Yours truly didn't learn about the federal corruption - until 2007 - and reported it (see my time stamped/clocked copy - here). Inexplicably and intolerably, in March 2008 (when the answer from the DOJ was due); the Public Corruption Task Force was SHUT DOWN; and career federal prosecutors were threatened to keep their mouths shut!
SEE the Los Angeles Times March 2008 story "Shake-up roils federal prosecutors" - here).
When you have federal prosecutors being corrupt - that creates "Prosecutorial GAPS";
which can be filled in by a "Private Attorney General"!
That's Me!
[br][hr][br]
BRAND NEW = EMERGENCY = Filing by yours truly.
I'm asking the court (here) for EMERGENCY permission (as a "pro se" Private Attorney General) - to file a 2nd Amended Complaint.
This judge has been more than fair (even though I'm using terms like federal corruption that NO attorney would usually utilize). It is customary to allow several "Amended Complaints" and "pro se" parties are supposed to be give "some" latitude (as long as you are NOT wasting the courts time).
Will let you know what the court says - by Monday!
Meanwhile, you should read this Emergency Request (here) and look at the 8 exhibits at the end?
All my proof of crimes are federal court records;
and federal archives undeniable!
[br]
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Abraham Lincoln is the one who said
"He who represents himself - has a fool for a client".
And he was a GREAT attorney.
I'm in WAY over my head;
but their hubris left a fantastic evidence trail.
One can only hope!
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)If they only dared tell the tale!
The dominos would fall and Fall and FALL......
http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertlenzner/2014/02/05/goldman-sachs-has-still-not-gotten-its-house-in-order/
2naSalit
(86,622 posts)I do hope this ends in your favor!
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Romney and his RICO gangs are stealing companies, jobs, pensions etc., - from U.S. all!
Doing so by federal corruption (and mayhem/homicides) - is something that one shouldn't have to beg, plead and fight the federal agencies to do something about.
2naSalit
(86,622 posts)on both points. However, you are the one leading the charge and in that I hope that you succeed! Wish I could help with that but I'm so far away and don't have certification to act in many functions...
At any rate, I hope that success is nigh!
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Each and every time you like, tweet, comment, discuss - etc., etc.
You are helping bring justice here!
I THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH!
2naSalit
(86,622 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)I think the GOP is so pathetically desperate, that they are going to run the same piles of crap as in 2012. Perry is already hard at work polishing his turd.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)He really doesn't care that we know he did all these crimes;
because the DOJ does NOT care that he lies under oath.
It's his religious right to do so!
N'est-ce pas!
bookcase10
(8 posts)keep up the good fight. We are proud of you for not giving up !!!!!
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)I'm just silly enough to keep coming back for more banging away....
Scuba
(53,475 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)We should get her to be the U.S. Attorney General
next....
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Also,
I kind of like this part-
After receiving this court's ruling on the request to have U.S. Marshals serve Defendants in this case and studying at law libraries physical and online; this plaintiff learned he could mail a request for the "waiver" of service to Defendants.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)I also did "Request" that the court grant me (once it approves the 2nd Amended Complaint filing) a chance to Notice the parties later - where they could then respond in April.
We'll soon know the court's mindset.
I'm so WAY in over my head here;
but the evidences/proofs are SO overwhelming, profuse
and irrefutable public docket records!