The Simple Truth About Biblical Literalism and the Christian Fundamentalists Who Promote It

[xchrom]

http://www.alternet.org/simple-truth-about-biblical-literalism-and-christian-fundamentalists-who-promote-it



In a much-hyped event live-streamed Tuesday night, “Science Guy” Bill Nye set out to defend evolution in a debate with Ken Ham, the CEO of Kentucky’s Creation Museum. But there was a fundamental problem: Ham’s young-earth creationism is not a religious belief, and it certainly is not scientific. To put it bluntly, it is quackery.

To understand Ham’s view, we need a brief history of how the Bible is interpreted, and where his radically new heuristic comes from. As Paul Fry notes, literary theory or the study of texts (hermeneutics) was originally developed to interpret the Bible. Interpretations have always been based on contemporary events and politics – for instance, centuries of Christian anti-Semitism was based on an attempt to placate the Roman empire. Biblical literalism as an interpretative method can be traced back to Martin Luther’s denunciation of the Catholic Church and his use of scripture to undermine their authority. Martin Luther’s democratic mission later combined with the tenets of the scientific revolution and fundamentalist politics to produce biblical literalism, the idea that the Bible is a series of testable assertions that can be proven or disproven and that a layman can read and understand the meaning of scripture.

Biblical literalism is absurd, but it is simple. The fundamentalist is not interested in deeper truths, but rather weaponizing the Bible. A perfect example is women having authority in church. The verse fundamentalists cite to support this view is from, 1 Corinthians 14, where Paul tells the church of Corinth that women should be silent during the service. In many fundamentalist churches, this verse is used to deny women the right to become pastor, or even pray aloud during the service. Biblical scholar Ken Bailey notes that during this time in the Middle East, services were often held in classical Arabic, which women could not understand (most spoke a local dialect). Throughout the service they would begin to gossip, often so loudly that the minister would ask them to be silent. Paul, Bailey argues, was repeating this injunction in his letter. As Nye notes in the debate, Ham and other fundamentalists are rather selective with the verses they choose to interpret literally. Reverend Cornel West put it bluntly, “fundamentalists want to be fundamental about everything except, ‘love thy neighbor.’ ”

Because Ham’s claims are clearly unscientific (he denies radiometric dating, claims that the earth is 6,000 years old based on incomplete genealogies and argues that the flood explains tectonic shifts) we must call them what they are: quackery. H.L. Mencken noted that human progress, “tends to go too fast – that is, too fast for the great majority of comfortable and incurious men.” Because of this, he worried that, “the average man, finding himself getting beyond his depth, instantly concludes that what lies beyond is simple nonsense.” This attitude was on display throughout the debate, when Bill Nye would accept ambiguity and Ken Ham simply substituted ambiguity for absolute and uncompromising and entirely unfounded certainty.

[marmar]

1. k/r

[66 dmhlt]

2. "Science has proof without any certainty ...

Creationists have certainty without any proof."

~ Ashley Montagu

[Major Nikon]

3. Quackery relates to the medical field

I prefer to refer to it as dipshittery.

[hueymahl]

6. +1

LOL!

[CreekDog]

4. Though Martin Luther was not a biblical literalist

for what it's worth.

[The Wizard]

5. But Jesus wrote the Bible in American

because America is exceptional and.....................
Critical thinking is work, and if there's anything religious fundamentalists loathe it's work. They refuse to tax their brains with finding solutions and would rather attribute everything that happens to an imaginary sky hero.

[lady lib]

7. "...weaponizing the Bible."

Boy, that describes what's being done perfectly.

[Major Nikon]

10. It's what's been done at least throughout recorded history

If you want something that you can use to get people to march to their deaths for your cause, or placate the unwashed masses to keep them from rioting, all with the promise of a reward that you don't have to pay and can't be verified, one would have a hard time coming up with something better than organized religion.

[lady lib]

13. Amen

and tax free to boot.

[blackspade]

8. +1

Well laid out OP.

[cally]

9. Thanks. I love authors with new insights

into longstanding debates.

[LibertyLover]

11. A very interesting article

although I did note something I think is incorrect. According to one of scholars quotes, Ken Bailey, the admonition in 1 Corinthians 14 about women keeping silent during services is because the couldn't understand the classical Arabic the service was conducted in. I believe that at that time the language of the service would have been Greek, especially in Corinth. Arabic would have been a local dialect way out in the Arabian peninsula in the 1st century CE. I don't know if the services would have been in classical Greek, which differed from the spoken Greek somewhat of that period, but again, I'm somewhat suspicious as only the upper class males would have been afforded an opportunity to learn classical Greek and the early ministers of the Christian church were not drawn from upper class men. Koine is a possibility also, especially outside of Greece.

[Enthusiast]

14. Kicked and recommended.

"The fundamentalist is not interested in deeper truths, but rather weaponizing the Bible."

This is just a fact.