Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLockheed F-35 Overruns Top $1 Billion (for 63 aircraft) Government Auditor Finds
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-20/lockheed-f-35-overruns-top-1-billion-government-auditor-finds.htmlLockheed F-35 Overruns Top $1 Billion, Government Auditor Finds
By Tony Capaccio - Tue Mar 20 19:00:00 GMT 2012
Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT)s first 63 F-35 fighter jets are exceeding their combined target cost by $1 billion, showing the Pentagons costliest program lacks a reliable design and efficient manufacturing, according to U.S. congressional auditors.
The Pentagon is absorbing $672 million and Lockheed Martin the remaining $328 million in added costs for the aircraft in the first four production contracts, the Government Accountability Office said in prepared testimony today for a House Armed Services Committee hearing on tactical aviation. The committee is conducting the first oversight hearing on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter for the fiscal 2013 budget.
The long-stated intent that the Joint Strike Fighter would deliver an affordable, highly common fifth-generation aircraft that could be acquired in large numbers could be in question, Michael Sullivan, the GAOs director of acquisition management, said in the statement.
The testimony previews the GAOs annual report on the Defense Departments most costly weapons program, which is to be published next month. The GAOs findings and the Pentagons annual test report, issued in January, are the two primary sources that lawmakers and the public have for assessing the militarys and Lockheed Martin claims for the F-35.
unhappycamper comment: BTW, that's $1 billion dollars for the first 63 aircraft, not the entire batch of 2,443 F-35s.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1221 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lockheed F-35 Overruns Top $1 Billion (for 63 aircraft) Government Auditor Finds (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Mar 2012
OP
xchrom
(108,903 posts)1. ...
caraher
(6,279 posts)2. "The Pentagon is absorbing $672 million..."
Doesn't that mean WE are paying $672 million? It's framed as if the Pentagon were some private entity taxpayers didn't fund.
As for the future fleet, presumably per-unit overruns will go way down as they get things figured out. At this rate the overrun would be $40 billion or so for all of them. But I'd be surprised if we actually built them all - at some point even the Pentagon will notice that piloted combat aircraft have a limited future.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)3. Where are the teabag deficit hawks on this? Where are the Paul boys??
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)4. It's a timeless story of love and glory...
Cost Plus strikes again.