General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsU.S. telecom regulator will write new 'Open Internet' rules
Feb 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler will once again seek to set rules that make sure broadband providers do not discriminate or block any content on the Internet, a senior FCC official said on Wednesday.
The FCC will not appeal a U.S. court decision last month that rejected a previous version of these rules because of the way the FCC had classified broadband providers, the official said.
But the court said the commission does have the authority to regulate broadband access under Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the FCC will use that authority to review how it can bring back non-discrimination and no-blocking regulations while complying with the court order. (Reporting by Alina Selyukh; Editing by Doina Chiacu)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/19/usa-fcc-internet-idUSL2N0LO18720140219
Ed. note: Earlier today, the White House issued its response to a We the People petition on net neutrality. You can read it below, or see the response here.
Thank you to everyone who has signed on to this petition in support of a free and open Internet. Since his days as a United States Senator, President Obama has embraced the principle of net neutrality. As the President recently noted, his campaign for the White House was empowered by an open Internet; it allowed millions of supporters to interact with the President and each other in unprecedented fashion. That experience helped give rise to the creation of this very platform -- the We The People website -- where Americans can express their opinions on any topic and receive a response from the White House. Rights of free speech, and the free flow of information, are central to our society and economy -- and the principle of net neutrality gives every American an equal and meaningful opportunity to participate in both. Indeed, an open Internet is an engine for freedom around the world.
Preserving an open Internet is vital not to just to the free flow of information, but also to promoting innovation and economic productivity. Because of its openness, the Internet has allowed entrepreneurs -- with just a small amount of seed money or a modest grant -- to take their innovative ideas from the garage or the dorm room to every corner of the Earth, building companies, creating jobs, improving vital services, and fostering even more innovation along the way.
Absent net neutrality, the Internet could turn into a high-priced private toll road that would be inaccessible to the next generation of visionaries. The resulting decline in the development of advanced online apps and services would dampen demand for broadband and ultimately discourage investment in broadband infrastructure. An open Internet removes barriers to investment worldwide.
A wide spectrum of stakeholders and policymakers recognize the importance of these principles. In the wake of last month's court decision, it was encouraging to hear major broadband providers assert their commitment to an open Internet.
It was also encouraging to see Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler, whom the President appointed to that post last year, reaffirm his commitment to a free and open Internet and pledge to use the authority granted by Congress to maintain a free and open Internet. The White House strongly supports the FCC and Chairman Wheeler in this effort.
The petition asked that the President direct the FCC to reclassify Internet service providers as "common carriers" which, if upheld, would give the FCC a distinct set of regulatory tools to promote net neutrality. The FCC is an independent agency. Chairman Wheeler has publicly pledged to use the full authority granted by Congress to maintain a robust, free and open Internet -- a principle that this White House vigorously supports.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/02/17/we-people-response-reaffirming-white-houses-commitment-net-neutrality
ProSense
(116,464 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)is dependent on a free and open Internet, as well as does 8 jobs.
If my job is jerked out from under me because of this shit, I will retaliate. After all, I will have nothing else to lose.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)posts about net neutrality but this (possibly) good news post is all but ignored!
Hey Prosense, I assume some aren't happy with the choice of Wheeler at FCC? (Sincere question)...
1awake
(1,494 posts)most everyone has already received the bottom section because we signed it. I am very interested in the top and am currently checking it out.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)What ever you do Mr. President, dont take them at their word.
They lie, as evidenced by the sudden slowdown of speeds expressed by streaming content users around the country as soon as the ink dried on the judge's order.
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)whoever they bought a while back. But you're right, what broadband providers claim as "open internet" doesn't involve slowing down certain providers, they mean not blocking sites or chargin to put something on the internet. They don't want regulation, they just want the ability to make more money by charging content providers. They don't want to keep any content providers out, mind you, they just want to make money discriminating against them.
That's one of the reasons the term net neutrality is bad. It means different things and the average consumer doesn't know what each company is referring to.
2naSalit
(86,612 posts)Thanks for posting! I can't afford anything but the most rudimentary access and I would be totally isolated without open internet.
Can't even look/apply for a job without either.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)here:
ACLU: Rebooting Net Neutrality
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024530190