General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUtah bill Would Limit Gov't Funded Broadband Networks:
Kansas isn't the only state considering legislation that would limit the growth of government-funded broadband networks that threaten incumbent Internet service providers.
The latest such attempt we've learned of is a Utah House bill called the "Interlocal Entity Service Prohibition," which would prevent a regional fiber consortium from building infrastructure outside the boundaries of its member cities and towns.
While it would affect any such group, the bill seems to be directed at UTOPIA, the Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agency, a consortium of 16 cities that operates a fiber-to-the-premises broadband network. The bill explicitly targets fiber only, not affecting cable or other types of network.
SNIP
Established providers have been forced to lower prices in areas where UTOPIA offers services, and in Provo where Google Fiber is building a network, Crane said.
Crane lives in a part of Layton that isn't served by UTOPIA yet and pays Comcast $242 a month for an Internet, TV, and phone package with speeds of less than 10Mbps, he said. In Provo, Comcast is reportedly offering a $120 triple-play package with 105Mbps download speeds
Continued at Link:
wocaonimabi
(187 posts)okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)states have anti-government cable laws.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)...after the Net Neutrality ruling, it's amazing how fast things are moving to legislate and consolidate efforts which are clearly anti-consumer oriented.
Where do we go from here...?
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)the gov't sponsored fiber networks weren't created because of net neutrality problems but rather with cost and infrastructure problems. Now that the net neutrality rulings have come out, it is an extra incentive to expand. I'll try to post more info as I research.