General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm against the gender wars
But after thousands of years of being property, being victimized and treated as second class citizens, I don't think the gender wars should end with a surrender by women.
Both genders should work together to insure that women, who have been historically and presently treated as second class citizens, albeit with some changes in some parts of the world in the past 100 years, are given equality compared to men.
in pay
in opportunities
in status
in control of their bodies
in my community, in my state, in your state, in this country, in all countries. everywhere.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)Well said
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)There is an actual history of women's issues that are real and should be treated as such. Not some message board games to get people's posts hidden.
Great post.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Initech
(100,081 posts)If this keeps up I might consider investing in butter futures too!
Cleita
(75,480 posts)It's all I ever hoped for when back in my early years I was making 61% of the wages men were; when I couldn't go to certain colleges because women weren't allowed; when there were good paying job promotions I wasn't allowed to have; when I was called a slut for spending the night with my boyfriend; when my best friend had to go the Mexico for an abortion because they were illegal. We have come a ways but have a long way to go, but what we choose to wear has nothing to do with achieving these goals.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)to pretend that any of the issues brought up by the people you are railing against has anything to do with what we choose to wear. There is going to be a shortage of straw in your area soon.
We have a long way to go, but... but... but...today's vocal feminists are just too sensitive and their tone is so unpleasant. Amiright?
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Don't you have a life other than stalking me from thread to thread? Shouldn't you be at the mall selling beach wear burkas or something?
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Stalking you? In your world it really is just all about you isn't it? Hey, at your age, I would probably say you've earned that. But I'm finding it hard to even give you that much respect. You seem to have nothing but contempt for those who wish to make life just a little less hostile for women. Like I said before, that is the exact opposite of being a bad ass.
Just sayin...
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I don't know about your personal life, but you are not in hostile atmosphere here in DU. Let me play my tiny violin for you.
What may or may not appear hostile to you is not the issue here. IT'S NOT ABOUT YOU. You admit that you have never encountered anything like I and many other women have in our lifetimes, so how would you have any idea what other women find hostile? Why instead do you portray the vocal feminists here as overly sensitive and prudish? The only reason I can imagine is that you have never walked in their shoes. Because you were the bad ass woman who never took shit from anyone and had "back up", you make it sound like anyone who wasn't able to do so is/was just too sensitive and weak willed. Well, I'll tell you a little about my personal life. I was raped by my father when I was 8 years old. I probably shouldn't have believed that he would really kill me if I told anyone. I mean being punched in the face and strangled by that man surely didn't reinforce that fear. And I probably should have starting working out much younger in life so that I could fend off the two men who crawled in my bedroom window when I was twelve and put a gun to my head while raping me. After they left, I found my mom passed out in the garbage with a needle sticking out of her arm. So, yeah that was my "back up". Needless to say, I suffered some severe emotional trauma on top of the physical shit that happened to me. And that's just the shit that happened before I became a teenager. People used to tell me how "strong" I was to have survived and overcome the things I have in my life. I wasn't strong. I was terrified and suffered from extreme depression and pstd until I was in my mid 30's. To ME, rape culture is very real. It has taken it's toll on me and I would really love to change things for my daughter and granddaughter. So when I see people here talk about redefining rape and trying to blur the lines of consent I get outraged. When I see women reduced to nothing more than objects, I get outraged. That reduction is VERY harmful and hostile not only to those who have walked in my shoes, but even to those who have never had to deal with it. A lot of women don't have to deal with it until it happens to them. And that's what we want to change. Not what you wear to the beach.
FFS.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)projecting that on your fellow DUers who are not guilty of those traumas done to you isn't how you get even, get closure or whatever it is that you are looking for. It only creates a very divisive situation in a place that many of us consider a haven from our right wing neighbors, family and co-workers. I don't know if you are being influenced by others here but don't insist everyone has to be in total agreement with your views and most of all blaming the results of those disagreements as hostilities is pretty weird frankly.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)You can bury your head in the sand and sing la la la. Apparently nothing is going to help you connect the dots. But you cannot shut me or any other woman up or make us sit at the back of the bus. That just isn't going to happen. And the fact that pointing out the harm of objectification is what offends you is frankly really fucking weird.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)And again, that was incredibly brave of you. I wish I had your courage.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)Your insensitivity is breathtaking. Instead of doing what any DECENT person would do, i.e., express your condolences and back off, nooooo you had to pile on and continue to blame and shame and declare her to be "weird".
Unfuckingbelievable. Don't bother to respond, you are going on ignore immediately.
To the jury - go ahead and hide this. I'll gladly take the hit.
RC
(25,592 posts)Cleita had some good points. She was not rude. She was not condescending. She stated her thoughts quite well, in my opinion.
However the responses to Cleita does leave something to be desired... To put it nicely.
How can you expect respect in return when you do not give it in the first place?
Jetboy
(792 posts)Well put.
hlthe2b
(102,298 posts)No, not everyone has experienced the same impacts in life, but that should not keep most compassionate people from understanding the viewpoints of others.
That's all I'm going to say.
just fucking stop
my god.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)That's such a tremendously difficult task to pull off.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)boston bean
(36,222 posts)that you are going to align yourself with a woman who says a rape victim is lying to get sympathy?
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Insensitivity to abuse/assault victims is one thing that tends to make me see red.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)You have demonstrated repeatedly how "sorry" you are.
You have been telling other women "fuck you" and "shove it" and ignoring any information shared with you in favor of clinging to your desperately held illusions.
Have fun tossing women who are fighting to be TREATED LIKE HUMAN BEINGS under the bus so you can stay clueless.
She is not projecting jack shit, and you know it.
Response to redqueen (Reply #58)
Post removed
redqueen
(115,103 posts)First you mock her with your smiley then when she pours her guts out you just go 'sorry but.... ' and continue to defend the right of people to post OBJECTIFYING BULLSHIT on a goddamn POLITICAL DISCUSSION BOARD.
Thank you, really, for making your priorities, your lack of empathy, and your penchant for victim blaming so very crystal clear.
Response to redqueen (Reply #64)
Post removed
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Here's a friendly suggestion: Stop digging.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Not trivial stuff like human equality.
RBStevens
(227 posts)Sexual objectification of women is sexism. Sexism is a feminist issue.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)You respond so cold heartedly and you hurl further insults like "come out from the same rock".
I came out from under the rock that shows compassion and understanding. How about you?
Response to boston bean (Reply #69)
Post removed
boston bean
(36,222 posts)Extremely callous, uncalled for remark.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)You want to believe her go ahead. I did tell her I was sorry that she went through all the trauma, if it's true. But no one noticed that part. They preferred to say I was mean because I really was asking her not to project her hurts on people who didn't hurt her.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)read and examine what you have written. I've had about enough of. What a disgusting display. I've gotten a frickin belly full.
hlthe2b
(102,298 posts)Your lack of empathy is surely going to follow you in future relationships on DU. I've never had an unpleasant encounter with you as far as I can remember, but I am just slack-jawed reading this.
I suspect you are in a defensive cycle and having trouble breaking out of it. I surely hope that you do as the callousness you are portraying is pretty unbelievable.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)trying to gain sympathy? How cold and unfeeling that seems to me. Uff da!
redqueen
(115,103 posts)You blamed women for being objectified, insinuated that women who call out objectification are just "jealous", and now you're assuming women whose assertions you find inconvenient are simply liars!
That's quite the collection of (not quite) feminist talking points there, woman.
You are a piece of fucking work.
Be proud.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Looks like I hit a note. Truth hurts and you guys don't like the truth.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Yeah, do you realize you're not even making any sense at all at this point?
Hmmm. Suddenly I'm reminded of something JAG said recently...
*backs away slowly*
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)And HoF feminists would never throw other women off/under the bus...can you imagine if 6 posters who identified themselves as pro-men here wrote the exact same words to you in the dozen or so previous posts? Disgusting.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Have the fucking decency to just shut the fuck up.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)You fucking shut up first. (see, I can use vulgar language too!) I truly dislike anonymous bullies who gang up on a woman who doesn't tow the HoF line on on DU. Deal with it.
RBStevens
(227 posts)who has just cruelly and callously called a victim/survivor a liar?
If anything ever deserves a STFU it's that.
Response to RBStevens (Reply #107)
Post removed
RBStevens
(227 posts)And I'm sure you could say a lot of things to puff yourself up especially while wasted apparently.
If I had not listened to so many real accounts from real victims/survivors I might just dismiss it some kind of bullshit internet cred-puffing crap too. But I have and I don't.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Whatever floats your boat. Maybe you like tagteam posting here. Personally, the only victim I see on this thread is Cleita and that has nothing do do with her personal story, but the reactions she got for not agreeing with Sisters of the Perpetually Outraged.
RBStevens
(227 posts)Cleita asserts that she is not a victim. What have you to gain by making her into one?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)wrote her history and Seabeyond posted it in March of last year.It's not a "made up story" and those who insist on saying it is are vile.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)no matter how hurtful, as a weapon against their discussion-board "enemies."
hlthe2b
(102,298 posts)One thing about those who project on to others their own misdeeds, is that their pattern is quickly recognized. Your pattern, Old and In the Way, has become legendary. And, that is surely no compliment.
Not to worry about making some vulgar response, I do believe in "ignore" and you clearly have earned a spot.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)that no one should have to ensure, you're down with that?
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)is people walking into a raw subthread like this and taking a big steaming shit right in the middle of it.
This is not the time or place to air your grievances.
Response to MadrasT (Reply #100)
Post removed
boston bean
(36,222 posts)to say to someone after they just bared their soul to you?
Well, fuck, that has got to be one of the coldest, meanest responses I've read in a fucking long time.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)What goes around comes around. It hasn't been just this thread. It goes back to others that I did in a light hearted manner and they all descend to alter the conversation with bull shit arguments and accusations. The LGBT community hasn't been much better. They accused me of being anti-gay on some things I was saying about the Pussy Riot debacle. I wasn't even thinking about any gay issues or trying to go out of my way to insult them. I think everyone has gone crazy here.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)Are you flaming out here, or what?
Cleita
(75,480 posts)is a good guy.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)you think they are cruel to you.
Is it a multitude of reasons?
RBStevens
(227 posts)Just heartless.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)You reply to someone who lays her life open and keep right on attacking her positions. I'm far from impressed with your reply. It is merely a continuation of your previous negative posts to that DUer.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)hlthe2b
(102,298 posts)NO one can take that away from you. You are a tremendous example to many here.
Kali
(55,014 posts)I am so sorry that shit happened to you. to anyone.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)And I am so sorry you have been met with such callous insensitivity and disregard here.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)It is abhorrent that so many people find it so easy to simply dismiss those they personally brand as somehow deserving being treated like shit ("unless you allow it" my fat Latina ass).
Please know you have far more allies here than you know. It's just that the callous libertarian(ish) chorus on du is on full blast lately.
I would back you up as my sister even if I didn't personally empathize with your pain, and also your hope for a better future for others.
For some women, the right to earn almost as much money for the same jobs as men is apparently enough.
For.them, the right to at least not be stoned to death for adultery is enough.
The right to wear bikinis is enough.
Etc, etc... they've settled. They've decided to accept sexual harassment and get annoyed when other women call it out. Ignore them.
I thank you for being as brave as you were, to share all of that here. I'm sorry you got such a cold, unfeeling response... but I'm not surprised.
Thank you also for helping to change the way society treats women. Thank you for not settling for "it wasn't enough" - we know we deserve freedom.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)damn.
A very genuine
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Yes, something ACTUALLY alerted this.
Needless to say, I voted to leave it, and shame the Alerter as well.
And finally, you rock, JTFrog. That was beautiful.
hlthe2b
(102,298 posts)I'd surely like to see the result. My my...
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Honestly, I don't know if I even want to post the results. Obviously, it was voted to leave it. I'll PM you.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)hlthe2b
(102,298 posts)Tanuki
(14,919 posts)On Thu Feb 20, 2014, 03:32 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
W.T.F.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4536619
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Over the top drama intended to insult, minimize and degrade other people - shameful, considering the topic. Please hide.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Feb 20, 2014, 03:42 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This appears to be alert-stalking. What is shameful is the relentless baiting the poster had been subjected to prior to writing the alerted-on post. I hardly recognize this place any more.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see nothing wrong with this post. It's an opinion. Considering the dismissive tone of the person the poster was responding to, I admire her restraint.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: My only objection to the alerted post is the lack of paragraph breaks. Other than that, I can't see the problem.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter should be ashamed. This was an incredibly powerful and painful testimony, so I'll forgive JTFrog some choice words to describe one of the most painful experiences of her life.
Needless to say, LEAVE IT.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)Two persons decided to hide it?? WTF??
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Typical. I can't imagine any possible reason to vote to hide JTFrog's post. Not one possible reason. Vile.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Holy Hell --two DUers voted to hide the post based on that.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)were flagged for review overnight, for two hidden posts each in this thread last night........
They have been unflagged and are back as full active members as early as today.
I.don't.get.it.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)ones who I believe are reflexive liars yet if one of them had made that post, the last thing that I'd do is call him/her a liar. Why? Because even if they were lying about their own experiences those things have happened to people that I know, people who spent years afraid to tell because they witnessed others being dismissed as liars when they told about rape and incest. I'm not going to add to their trauma.
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)I'm sorry you had to go through that. We're here for you.
cinnabonbon
(860 posts)Thank you for standing up. I'm sorry that happened to you.
Squinch
(50,956 posts)And beyond being infuriating, it is horrifying that your telling of your experience was met with such coldness and meanness.
I read your posts, and I am in awe of your control, and your strength.
I wish you peace. Be well.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Outstanding post, you are one brave lady, JTFrog.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)I'm so sorry you endured such horrific experiences, and I am also sorry that people here have respond with cruelty toward your story. I just want to say I support you. I respect your strength in sharing your personal story. That takes a lot of courage, particularly in this environment.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)You sure aren't welcoming to JTFrog. First you willfully and deliberately distort the arguments many here have raised, then you hurl nsults when she points that out. If that's not hostile, what is?
By the way, the law defines a hostile environment, as based on the Civil Rights Law of 1964. The kind of pictures you claim are about what people "choose to wear' (a patently false distortion and factually wrong) is part of that environment. That is why they have been prohibited for decades in public spaces, non-profits, Democratic Party offices, and places of employment that follow the law. It's starting to wonder if some members here have held a job at any point in the past thirty years because you complain about what is standard practice in public spaces for decades. So yeah, progress and equal rights are a huge burden. You're just going to have to deal with it. It's part of the modern world. Of course. you could always band with the GOP to get those laws overturned. Or you can insist DU not follow practices intended to promote diversity and instead argue for a website that deliberately excludes the key constituencies of the Democratic Party, as the T and A threads and "soul food" thread, among others, were intended to do. Pretending deliberately hostile actions do not exclude is disingenuous, since there is decades of case law that shows they do. (see, for example, Jensen vs. Evelyth Taconite).
That you think swimsuit models choose their clothing is for photo shoots is pretty hysterical. Yeah, feminists here are all the time posting about women wearing too little clothing on beaches or out in public. Only they don't. People who make those arguments are generally blaming rape victims for their own assaults or shaming some pop star because they think she dress too "slutty." Ironically they are the very people who defend the swimsuit centerfolds being posted on DU. The key point is that men, not women, control how women are to be presented in public. It has nothing to do with women's choices. It is about explicitly denying women choices. Those same people argue that if women wear make up or high heels, objectification is their fault. They are asking for it. These issues are all about one issue--male control over public space and over women's bodies. (And not even all men, only a minority of men here who are angry at the progress of the past half century. Warren Stupidity's thread shows the majority of members believe those pics promote a hostile environment).
So you keep insulting people on this site who dare to care about equal rights, completely fabricate arguments they never articulated, and maintain your inane fantasies about the multi-billion dollar corporate media, which appears to mean more to you than the rights of your fellow Americans. You turn to personal attacks and create a cartoon caricature of an argument because you are either unwilling or unable to engage with ideas actually raised.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)one.
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)That has NOTHING, and I mean NOTHING to do with private websites. It ONLY applies to schools, the workplace, public places like restaurants, motels, hotels, and the government. Is this website your workplace? Your school? No? Then it doesn't apply here.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)I am not spreading misinformation. The law regulates behavior and sets standards for diverse environments. I am not saying that not following it on DU violates the law. You are right that a website can exist only for straight, white, men if that is what it chooses to do. It could be a neo-Nazi site, or anything else it wants to be. However, it is called Democratic Underground and says one of its goals is to see Democrats elected. That assumes some sort of respect for people who actually vote for Democrats--the central constituencies being women and people of color. I am saying not following those standards shows a willful determination to create a hostile environment, which is of course the purpose of those posts. Got it? This is supposed to be a site for liberals, for Democrats. Diversity and inclusion should be a valued. To do otherwise is reactionary. You want to promote a reactionary space that only exists online, go for it. But don't for a minute pretend that it is anything but an ultra-reactionary and deliberately hostile effort to exclude women and people of color.
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)R B Garr
(16,954 posts)Why do you keep asking her to explain what she has already explained in detail?
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)R B Garr
(16,954 posts)My post asked you why you keep asking for an explanation about something already explained in detail. It was explained in detail in her post that you responded to. Did you not read it?
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Because they claim to be Democrats, which should entail valuing diversity. Clearly that is not the case for some who are openly hostile to diversity and seek to exclude anyone who doesn't share their mid-20th century view of the world. Because it points out there is conclusive legal evidence that such behavior is part of a pattern to intimidate and harass, which is indeed why those threads were posted.
This really shouldn't be too difficult to understand. Either one values equality and diversity or one doesn't. Clearly some people are openly hostile to both. That is evident in not only their ongoing defense of objectification but in their general opposition to equal opportunity and the concerns of feminists and people of color, and for some even LBGT members lately. Allowing a climate of intolerance means they become increasingly emboldened and develop an increasing sense of entitlement to express hostility toward the concerns and lives of anyone but themselves.
I explained my position here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4535510
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)Provide links that show the hostility against women in the original SI swimsuit thread (started by a woman, by the way).
I can wait.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)itself was some said was hostile, i think
. if not then I dont know what it was.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)Thank you for making me see it the other way.
Kali
(55,014 posts)it is just common decency to behave with some kind of respect for everybody
posting that kind of shit NO MATTER WHO DOES IT is creating a hostile environment for some, one that would also be ILLEGAL in some situations (NO I am not making that claim for a website, don;t fucking intentionally "misread" what I wrote)
what is so fucking hard about understanding that images of mostly nude women posturing for sexual effect is NOT appropriate for a political discussion site???
go enjoy that somewhere else, it does not belong here.
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)Five stores I've been to in my town have them there.
Are they creating a hostile environment? How about on network tv when women are walking around in bikinis (e.g. The Bachelor)? Is that network being hostile?
That's a pathetic excuse.
Response to Vashta Nerada (Reply #50)
Post removed
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Kali
(55,014 posts)sort of had a soft spot for this one due to a bit of an academic connection, but bleh
Kali
(55,014 posts)it is appropriate to post sexual images of women on a political site? because I have news for you
the owner has this to say about it after stepping in to lock another stupid thread full of skin and breast tissue:
Hope that doesn't confuse matters. I know your job is difficult already.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)The end.
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)Kali
(55,014 posts)do you think it is appropriate to post sexual images of women on a political site?
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)When the (WOMAN!) started the original swimsuit issue thread, she was celebrating 50 years of women athletes. It wasn't sexual at all.
It only became sexual when a certain contingent made it sexual.
Kali
(55,014 posts)see ya, I am not interested in intellectual dishonesty
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)R B Garr
(16,954 posts)Because she posted the pictures and just said, Wow. Those pictures of women in swimsuits that she posted -- they weren't athletes. So what was her "Wow" for?
Squinch
(50,956 posts)celebrate women athletes.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)here's why:
this thread is about equality and justice for women, something completely lacking for almost all of history and only slightly remedied worldwide in the past decade.
and what do you want to talk about in a thread about this?
how you are somehow victimized that DU is a place to talk about these injusticies and not a place to post bikini photos.
the idea that you think this makes you a victim and the other is not worthy to talk about in a thread about injustice towards women shows what you actually consider an injustice and what you do not.
stop stinking up the thread and making men look bad.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)in GD is not only a huge burden, but a form of injustice. How is it even worth the bandwidth and mental energy to make such posts?
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)MuseRider
(34,111 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)thank you.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)1awake
(1,494 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)MadrasT
(7,237 posts)would like to add the gentle reminder that there are more than two genders. And some people have no gender at all.
It would be improved by stating "all genders" (not "both" genders).
I believe a lot of problems begin with the root cause of viewing gender through a binary lens.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)do some adjusting in how things are viewed. We grew up being taught the biology of two genders, now there are more. Thank you for the lesson but be gentle with those who are just catching up.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)MadrasT
(7,237 posts)Gotta love it.
Wouldn't do to have those uppity transgender folks adding non-gentle reminders.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)a fucking cold ass wind just blew by.
the calculating.
the fucking nasty.
sickening.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)They suck.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)Kali
(55,014 posts)there is a lot of passive aggressive bullshit that needs calling out on occasion
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)ccpi
(2 posts)For Immediate release:
Tarasha Benjamin After 4 years---Should Feds Probe Missing Selma girls Disappearance
(National) Somethingjust doesnt add up in the disappearance of Selma teenager Tarasha Benjamins missing persons case. Benjamin, who turns 21 this year, was headed to the local Selma Flea market with her friend Telisha Givhan.
Both she and Gihvan got into the Mazda Tribute truck that Gihvan own. However, making just one stop a local barbershop, before the flea market, Gihvan offer Tarasha her truck after she claims that she had to do another young ladys hair.
Benjamin was asked by Gihvan, according to sources, to drop her off by the local fire department were Gihvan got into another car with her sister n law, leaving Tarasha to drive her SUV along. Two hours later, the Mazda Tribute truck was abandoned on the Cecil Jackson bypassa highway that leads to the local flea market. Benjamin was nowhere to be found.
After time had pass, Tarashas Mother Regina Benjamin had call the Selma Police Department and a search was launch. Family and friends was passing out flyers and going door to door to search for the missing teen.
The whole community searched for her after that. We were out on the streets-everywhere. Benjamin told the Selma Times Journal newspaper.
The National Center for missing & Exploited Children had sent several rescue team to Selma and the search came up empty.
The Selma Police Department and its investigation unit headed by Sgt Tory Neely had determine foul play, but since then, had treated the case as a teenage runaway. However, photos of the crime scene, clear finger prints left on the SUV, No Amber Alert, and a host of reasons, had led some to believe Benjamins missing persons case was boxed from the beginning.
Investigators, including lead detective Ronald Jones, did little work in Benjamins case. When two eye witnesses came forward and said, that they seem Tarasha get into the a black dodge charger, which was registered to Christopher Dukes, an associate of hers
and the second eye witness, a store clerk seen a person matching Dukes description, ... and seeing the young lady with him, the Selma Police department decided that one of the witness was mental.
It now seems as though the Selma Police Department are Psychologists, instead of law enforcement. In their own denial, they havent done little to anything to determine Benjamins case a cold one. And doing nothing seems to be their only way of trying to divert away from solving Tarashas case and expose the truth.
And there are reasons for their vigilance and avoidance of new leads, it was long rumored, That Tarasha was having Dealings with a Selma Police Officer. And she herself shares rumors about them.
Those rumors, May had prompted a direct visit from former Selma Police officer Bart Watkins. Watkins, who worked now as a deputy sheriff in Autauga County admits visiting Benjamin, but claim his visitation was official police business.
I had nothing to do with that girl. Watkins told investigators.
Watkins Told internal affairs investigators in Autauga, that he visited Tarasha to ask her about his colleague Christopher Harris, who was already charged by the Alabama Bureau of Investigations for raping a 12 year old girl.
Watkins was not elected as a Marengo County Sheriffs Deputy after just one year, when the agency thought that he might have been linked to a police impersonation attack on a woman in that county as well.
Some of the details in that rape case by the news reports, matches similar activities that had happen in Benjamin case in Selma, where the public saw a state trooper on the bypass behind the SUV Tarasha was driving.
The victim in the Moreno county rape incident told the newspapers that her attacker was a white male and now there is some evidence that Dukes may have taken Tarashas to a white male, who was driving the trooper car.
Tarasha case had been featured on Americas most wanteds website, The Maury Povich Show, Jet Magazine, and her picture profile is on the website of former CBS news Anchor Katie Couric.
But this, however, is not enough...The efforts now should be constant news reports and media coverage about her case as well as the FBI involvement.
Since the Alabama State Police had drop the ball on the case by refusing to show interest, the feds is the last hope in finding Tarasha and the truth as to what happen to her as well.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)I hope the family can find justice. Thank you for posting about this and educating me.
TBF
(32,068 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)...interesting as puritanical diatribes regarding objectification of swimsuit models.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...a gender war has broken out in this thread too. Yep, usual suspects.