Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 04:28 PM Feb 2014

I'm against the gender wars

But after thousands of years of being property, being victimized and treated as second class citizens, I don't think the gender wars should end with a surrender by women.

Both genders should work together to insure that women, who have been historically and presently treated as second class citizens, albeit with some changes in some parts of the world in the past 100 years, are given equality compared to men.

in pay
in opportunities
in status
in control of their bodies

in my community, in my state, in your state, in this country, in all countries. everywhere.

147 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm against the gender wars (Original Post) CreekDog Feb 2014 OP
*looks out from behind cash register* - I loove Cjeek Dogg! bettyellen Feb 2014 #1
! CreekDog Feb 2014 #2
K&R wryter2000 Feb 2014 #3
Yes, the "it's all in your head" type responses here are getting old R B Garr Feb 2014 #4
+1 Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #17
I'm not after I invested in stock in popcorn manufacturers ! Initech Feb 2014 #5
I can agree with that. Cleita Feb 2014 #6
It takes a lot of willful ignorance JTFrog Feb 2014 #7
Oh you again. Cleita Feb 2014 #9
And you flatter yourself yet again. JTFrog Feb 2014 #10
Playing that victim card is really getting boring. Cleita Feb 2014 #12
W.T.F. JTFrog Feb 2014 #16
........... sufrommich Feb 2014 #20
I'm sorry for all the tragedy in your life but Cleita Feb 2014 #22
You can dismiss it all you want. JTFrog Feb 2014 #23
Have a nice day. n/t Cleita Feb 2014 #25
Yea, thanks for nothing. n/t JTFrog Feb 2014 #26
I hear you, JTFrog. You are not alone. I stand in solidarity with you. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #28
It's really fucking weird, and really fucking sad. redqueen Feb 2014 #62
You have really crossed the line with this post. Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #29
And so the pile on begins. RC Feb 2014 #128
I agree with your post RC. Jetboy Feb 2014 #131
Honestly Cleita.... You CAN'T be as clueless as you maintain... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #35
STOP Kali Feb 2014 #36
Oh, dear. Now you've gone and offended Sheldon Cooper. Oh, my. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #39
you may have a piece of her cake, too. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #43
You're so into trying to score points boston bean Feb 2014 #87
Yeah, even fairly-hard-to-offend me is pretty offended by that. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #135
"You are only a sex object when you allow it to happen to you" redqueen Feb 2014 #58
Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #61
Thank you. That is the perfect response to show what kind of person you are. redqueen Feb 2014 #64
Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #67
Will you never get tired of demonstrating your cluelessness? redqueen Feb 2014 #74
You can't answer that can you because it's true.n/t Cleita Feb 2014 #77
Politics= Snowden, pot, and whatever guys decide is okay BainsBane Feb 2014 #121
Feminism IS politics. RBStevens Feb 2014 #97
What rock did you come out from under? boston bean Feb 2014 #69
Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #73
Are you fucking kidding me? Now you are going to call her a liar? boston bean Feb 2014 #78
And what if she is to gather the sympathy she has? Cleita Feb 2014 #82
Oh you are a piece of work. boston bean Feb 2014 #84
You really ought to take a step away... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #86
I don't care about the squabbles between you and whoever. But your lack of empathy is just gross. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #136
What? You assumed that she lied, and you think she's just MineralMan Feb 2014 #142
Shitfire! You are on a fucking ROLL today! redqueen Feb 2014 #81
"fucking" Oh my. You are using a dirty and unacceptable word in your community. Cleita Feb 2014 #83
Riiiight... redqueen Feb 2014 #89
Impossible! No one lies about anything about themselves on an anonymous posting board. Old and In the Way Feb 2014 #98
God,just stop it. sufrommich Feb 2014 #99
Who made you the board nanny? Old and In the Way Feb 2014 #102
"Bullies who gang up on a woman" RBStevens Feb 2014 #107
Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #110
How am I a "pro-bully"? What does that even mean? RBStevens Feb 2014 #111
Real victims...here or irl? Old and In the Way Feb 2014 #112
Yes real. Everywhere all my life. RBStevens Feb 2014 #116
RB, if you go to HoF,you will see JTFrog anonymously sufrommich Feb 2014 #113
Ultimate proof that personal beefs matter more than real issues. People will use *anything* nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #137
Wow... project much? hlthe2b Feb 2014 #114
But hostility toward a woman who shares heart renching personal experiences BainsBane Feb 2014 #123
No what is disgusting MadrasT Feb 2014 #100
Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #103
Who the f*ck has been influencing you to think this is an ok thing boston bean Feb 2014 #65
Maybe it was, but that person, well the whole group has been pretty mean to me for a long time. Cleita Feb 2014 #70
The LGBT community hasn't been much better? boston bean Feb 2014 #72
No they haven't. They've been pretty cruel to me just because I think Pope Francis Cleita Feb 2014 #75
Is that the only reason, cause you just gave another upthread as to why boston bean Feb 2014 #80
Heartless. RBStevens Feb 2014 #96
You know, I'm not sure I believe that you are sorry. MineralMan Feb 2014 #141
Cold, condescending, heartless response. n/t Gormy Cuss Feb 2014 #144
JTFrog, one of the bravest posts ever on DU. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #30
tremendous... How strong you have become to reveal all this, JTFrog hlthe2b Feb 2014 #32
VERY brave post Kali Feb 2014 #37
JTFrog I support you. MadrasT Feb 2014 #42
Oh JT, I am standing up right next to you. redqueen Feb 2014 #46
... AtheistCrusader Feb 2014 #52
I just got called to serve on a jury for this. NuclearDem Feb 2014 #85
Which post, NuclearDem? hlthe2b Feb 2014 #88
JTFrog baring her soul to the world, that one. NuclearDem Feb 2014 #90
Please PM them to me as well. boston bean Feb 2014 #92
thank you.... n/t hlthe2b Feb 2014 #95
JTFrog, somebody tried to shut you up by alerting on this post! But the jury backed you up. Tanuki Feb 2014 #91
I can't say anything else but, OMFG boston bean Feb 2014 #93
And of course they gave no explanation. Way to stick the ol' neck out, right? nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #138
And neither posted an explanation of their vote, I see. MineralMan Feb 2014 #143
That may be the most shameful alert that I've ever read here. Gormy Cuss Feb 2014 #145
The two posters accusing her of lying about it boston bean Feb 2014 #146
You know what? There are DUers I detest, ones I have sparred with forever, Gormy Cuss Feb 2014 #147
Powerful post, JT. Thank you for sharing this. R B Garr Feb 2014 #105
You are incredibly brave. cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #108
This must have been so difficult to write. Squinch Feb 2014 #117
((hugs)) Starry Messenger Feb 2014 #118
JTFrog BainsBane Feb 2014 #122
Not a hostile environment? BainsBane Feb 2014 #59
Person already hurled insults to me on another thread. Sorry if I wasn't exactly welcoming on this Cleita Feb 2014 #63
You're still spreading misinformation about the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #94
I was very clear BainsBane Feb 2014 #120
Since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has no application here, why are you using it? Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #125
She explained in detail. The real question is why you keep asking. R B Garr Feb 2014 #127
Thanks for answering, BainsBane. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #129
You responded to my post, not BainsBane R B Garr Feb 2014 #130
Because people claim to be liberals BainsBane Feb 2014 #134
What hostile atmosphere on this site? Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #15
the photo arely staircase Feb 2014 #18
read the thread. buy a clue. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #40
he did, he's been commenting on it left and right CreekDog Feb 2014 #44
not that one. this one. sorry. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #49
Nice examples. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #47
when people enter an environment that includes many diverse perspectives Kali Feb 2014 #45
Is it appropriate to display the swimsuit issue of SI in the checkout line at the store? Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #50
Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #53
I'm not the only one who needs to move on. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #55
This is me moving past you. Moving On. Bye Now. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #56
yep, I am about finished too Kali Feb 2014 #68
so I take it that is a yes? Kali Feb 2014 #54
I don't particularly want to open the floodgates to bikini pictures in GD. signed, Skinner. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #57
And this one remains unlocked. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #60
you have not answered the question Kali Feb 2014 #66
Only when it's done in a sexual way. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #71
right Kali Feb 2014 #76
Truth =/= intellectual dishonesty. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #79
Do you have a link to where she said was celebrating 50 years of women athletes? R B Garr Feb 2014 #104
Oh, Vashta, please. There is no part of you that believes that the point of that post was to Squinch Feb 2014 #119
you know what the problem is? it's you. CreekDog Feb 2014 #133
The lack of perspective is what really bugs me. As if being asked not to post cheesecake photos nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #139
k&r Starry Messenger Feb 2014 #8
Creeky MuseRider Feb 2014 #11
that is kind of you to say CreekDog Feb 2014 #132
Rec n/t LadyHawkAZ Feb 2014 #13
K&R n/t 1awake Feb 2014 #14
+1. nt bemildred Feb 2014 #19
I support this message *and* MadrasT Feb 2014 #21
For what its worth, many of us in the old spectrum of generations have had to Cleita Feb 2014 #24
you really take the cake. you know that, right? Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #31
Preemptive tone policing. MadrasT Feb 2014 #33
after she dissed JTFrog's testimony. good gawd. the callousness. the cold. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #38
Surrender by women is not the answer...working together raises up all of us. Great OP..thank you. Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #27
I'm against mean people Boom Sound 416 Feb 2014 #34
Me too! In_The_Wind Feb 2014 #41
well, playing nice doesn't always work Kali Feb 2014 #48
Testify, Kali. Standing with you in solidarity. n/t Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #51
Tarasha benjamin after 4 years ccpi Feb 2014 #101
what a terrible set of circumstances. boston bean Feb 2014 #106
K&R nt TBF Feb 2014 #109
Unlike porno and magazine covers, you are talking about real women's issues. But those aren't as... phleshdef Feb 2014 #115
Good post. Good post. nt AverageJoe90 Feb 2014 #124
I am all with you there, but AgingAmerican Feb 2014 #126
I'm with you, CreekDog! Enthusiast Feb 2014 #140

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
4. Yes, the "it's all in your head" type responses here are getting old
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 04:35 PM
Feb 2014

There is an actual history of women's issues that are real and should be treated as such. Not some message board games to get people's posts hidden.

Great post.

Initech

(100,081 posts)
5. I'm not after I invested in stock in popcorn manufacturers !
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 04:36 PM
Feb 2014

If this keeps up I might consider investing in butter futures too!

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
6. I can agree with that.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 04:39 PM
Feb 2014

It's all I ever hoped for when back in my early years I was making 61% of the wages men were; when I couldn't go to certain colleges because women weren't allowed; when there were good paying job promotions I wasn't allowed to have; when I was called a slut for spending the night with my boyfriend; when my best friend had to go the Mexico for an abortion because they were illegal. We have come a ways but have a long way to go, but what we choose to wear has nothing to do with achieving these goals.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
7. It takes a lot of willful ignorance
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 04:55 PM
Feb 2014

to pretend that any of the issues brought up by the people you are railing against has anything to do with what we choose to wear. There is going to be a shortage of straw in your area soon.

We have a long way to go, but... but... but...today's vocal feminists are just too sensitive and their tone is so unpleasant. Amiright?

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
9. Oh you again.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 05:16 PM
Feb 2014

Don't you have a life other than stalking me from thread to thread? Shouldn't you be at the mall selling beach wear burkas or something?

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
10. And you flatter yourself yet again.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 05:23 PM
Feb 2014

Stalking you? In your world it really is just all about you isn't it? Hey, at your age, I would probably say you've earned that. But I'm finding it hard to even give you that much respect. You seem to have nothing but contempt for those who wish to make life just a little less hostile for women. Like I said before, that is the exact opposite of being a bad ass.

Just sayin...




Cleita

(75,480 posts)
12. Playing that victim card is really getting boring.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 05:27 PM
Feb 2014

I don't know about your personal life, but you are not in hostile atmosphere here in DU. Let me play my tiny violin for you.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
16. W.T.F.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:05 PM
Feb 2014

What may or may not appear hostile to you is not the issue here. IT'S NOT ABOUT YOU. You admit that you have never encountered anything like I and many other women have in our lifetimes, so how would you have any idea what other women find hostile? Why instead do you portray the vocal feminists here as overly sensitive and prudish? The only reason I can imagine is that you have never walked in their shoes. Because you were the bad ass woman who never took shit from anyone and had "back up", you make it sound like anyone who wasn't able to do so is/was just too sensitive and weak willed. Well, I'll tell you a little about my personal life. I was raped by my father when I was 8 years old. I probably shouldn't have believed that he would really kill me if I told anyone. I mean being punched in the face and strangled by that man surely didn't reinforce that fear. And I probably should have starting working out much younger in life so that I could fend off the two men who crawled in my bedroom window when I was twelve and put a gun to my head while raping me. After they left, I found my mom passed out in the garbage with a needle sticking out of her arm. So, yeah that was my "back up". Needless to say, I suffered some severe emotional trauma on top of the physical shit that happened to me. And that's just the shit that happened before I became a teenager. People used to tell me how "strong" I was to have survived and overcome the things I have in my life. I wasn't strong. I was terrified and suffered from extreme depression and pstd until I was in my mid 30's. To ME, rape culture is very real. It has taken it's toll on me and I would really love to change things for my daughter and granddaughter. So when I see people here talk about redefining rape and trying to blur the lines of consent I get outraged. When I see women reduced to nothing more than objects, I get outraged. That reduction is VERY harmful and hostile not only to those who have walked in my shoes, but even to those who have never had to deal with it. A lot of women don't have to deal with it until it happens to them. And that's what we want to change. Not what you wear to the beach.

FFS.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
22. I'm sorry for all the tragedy in your life but
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:14 PM
Feb 2014

projecting that on your fellow DUers who are not guilty of those traumas done to you isn't how you get even, get closure or whatever it is that you are looking for. It only creates a very divisive situation in a place that many of us consider a haven from our right wing neighbors, family and co-workers. I don't know if you are being influenced by others here but don't insist everyone has to be in total agreement with your views and most of all blaming the results of those disagreements as hostilities is pretty weird frankly.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
23. You can dismiss it all you want.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:20 PM
Feb 2014

You can bury your head in the sand and sing la la la. Apparently nothing is going to help you connect the dots. But you cannot shut me or any other woman up or make us sit at the back of the bus. That just isn't going to happen. And the fact that pointing out the harm of objectification is what offends you is frankly really fucking weird.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
62. It's really fucking weird, and really fucking sad.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:20 PM
Feb 2014

And again, that was incredibly brave of you. I wish I had your courage.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
29. You have really crossed the line with this post.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:30 PM
Feb 2014

Your insensitivity is breathtaking. Instead of doing what any DECENT person would do, i.e., express your condolences and back off, nooooo you had to pile on and continue to blame and shame and declare her to be "weird".

Unfuckingbelievable. Don't bother to respond, you are going on ignore immediately.

To the jury - go ahead and hide this. I'll gladly take the hit.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
128. And so the pile on begins.
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 12:56 AM
Feb 2014

Cleita had some good points. She was not rude. She was not condescending. She stated her thoughts quite well, in my opinion.
However the responses to Cleita does leave something to be desired... To put it nicely.

How can you expect respect in return when you do not give it in the first place?

hlthe2b

(102,298 posts)
35. Honestly Cleita.... You CAN'T be as clueless as you maintain...
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:49 PM
Feb 2014

No, not everyone has experienced the same impacts in life, but that should not keep most compassionate people from understanding the viewpoints of others.

That's all I'm going to say.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
39. Oh, dear. Now you've gone and offended Sheldon Cooper. Oh, my.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:52 PM
Feb 2014

That's such a tremendously difficult task to pull off.

boston bean

(36,222 posts)
87. You're so into trying to score points
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:42 PM
Feb 2014

that you are going to align yourself with a woman who says a rape victim is lying to get sympathy?

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
135. Yeah, even fairly-hard-to-offend me is pretty offended by that.
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 05:54 AM
Feb 2014

Insensitivity to abuse/assault victims is one thing that tends to make me see red.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
58. "You are only a sex object when you allow it to happen to you"
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:16 PM
Feb 2014

You have demonstrated repeatedly how "sorry" you are.

You have been telling other women "fuck you" and "shove it" and ignoring any information shared with you in favor of clinging to your desperately held illusions.

Have fun tossing women who are fighting to be TREATED LIKE HUMAN BEINGS under the bus so you can stay clueless.

She is not projecting jack shit, and you know it.

Response to redqueen (Reply #58)

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
64. Thank you. That is the perfect response to show what kind of person you are.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:23 PM
Feb 2014

First you mock her with your smiley then when she pours her guts out you just go 'sorry but.... ' and continue to defend the right of people to post OBJECTIFYING BULLSHIT on a goddamn POLITICAL DISCUSSION BOARD.

Thank you, really, for making your priorities, your lack of empathy, and your penchant for victim blaming so very crystal clear.

Response to redqueen (Reply #64)

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
74. Will you never get tired of demonstrating your cluelessness?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:31 PM
Feb 2014

Here's a friendly suggestion: Stop digging.

boston bean

(36,222 posts)
69. What rock did you come out from under?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:28 PM
Feb 2014

You respond so cold heartedly and you hurl further insults like "come out from the same rock".

I came out from under the rock that shows compassion and understanding. How about you?

Response to boston bean (Reply #69)

boston bean

(36,222 posts)
78. Are you fucking kidding me? Now you are going to call her a liar?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:32 PM
Feb 2014

Extremely callous, uncalled for remark.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
82. And what if she is to gather the sympathy she has?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:34 PM
Feb 2014

You want to believe her go ahead. I did tell her I was sorry that she went through all the trauma, if it's true. But no one noticed that part. They preferred to say I was mean because I really was asking her not to project her hurts on people who didn't hurt her.

boston bean

(36,222 posts)
84. Oh you are a piece of work.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:36 PM
Feb 2014

read and examine what you have written. I've had about enough of. What a disgusting display. I've gotten a frickin belly full.

hlthe2b

(102,298 posts)
86. You really ought to take a step away...
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:41 PM
Feb 2014

Your lack of empathy is surely going to follow you in future relationships on DU. I've never had an unpleasant encounter with you as far as I can remember, but I am just slack-jawed reading this.

I suspect you are in a defensive cycle and having trouble breaking out of it. I surely hope that you do as the callousness you are portraying is pretty unbelievable.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
142. What? You assumed that she lied, and you think she's just
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 01:18 PM
Feb 2014

trying to gain sympathy? How cold and unfeeling that seems to me. Uff da!

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
81. Shitfire! You are on a fucking ROLL today!
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:34 PM
Feb 2014

You blamed women for being objectified, insinuated that women who call out objectification are just "jealous", and now you're assuming women whose assertions you find inconvenient are simply liars!

That's quite the collection of (not quite) feminist talking points there, woman.

You are a piece of fucking work.

Be proud.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
83. "fucking" Oh my. You are using a dirty and unacceptable word in your community.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:36 PM
Feb 2014

Looks like I hit a note. Truth hurts and you guys don't like the truth.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
89. Riiiight...
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:43 PM
Feb 2014

Yeah, do you realize you're not even making any sense at all at this point?

Hmmm. Suddenly I'm reminded of something JAG said recently...

*backs away slowly*

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
98. Impossible! No one lies about anything about themselves on an anonymous posting board.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:02 PM
Feb 2014

And HoF feminists would never throw other women off/under the bus...can you imagine if 6 posters who identified themselves as pro-men here wrote the exact same words to you in the dozen or so previous posts? Disgusting.

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
102. Who made you the board nanny?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:31 PM
Feb 2014

You fucking shut up first. (see, I can use vulgar language too!) I truly dislike anonymous bullies who gang up on a woman who doesn't tow the HoF line on on DU. Deal with it.

 

RBStevens

(227 posts)
107. "Bullies who gang up on a woman"
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 09:00 PM
Feb 2014

who has just cruelly and callously called a victim/survivor a liar?

If anything ever deserves a STFU it's that.

Response to RBStevens (Reply #107)

 

RBStevens

(227 posts)
111. How am I a "pro-bully"? What does that even mean?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 09:44 PM
Feb 2014

And I'm sure you could say a lot of things to puff yourself up especially while wasted apparently.

If I had not listened to so many real accounts from real victims/survivors I might just dismiss it some kind of bullshit internet cred-puffing crap too. But I have and I don't.

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
112. Real victims...here or irl?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 10:02 PM
Feb 2014

Whatever floats your boat. Maybe you like tagteam posting here. Personally, the only victim I see on this thread is Cleita and that has nothing do do with her personal story, but the reactions she got for not agreeing with Sisters of the Perpetually Outraged.

 

RBStevens

(227 posts)
116. Yes real. Everywhere all my life.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 10:12 PM
Feb 2014

Cleita asserts that she is not a victim. What have you to gain by making her into one?

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
113. RB, if you go to HoF,you will see JTFrog anonymously
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 10:03 PM
Feb 2014

wrote her history and Seabeyond posted it in March of last year.It's not a "made up story" and those who insist on saying it is are vile.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
137. Ultimate proof that personal beefs matter more than real issues. People will use *anything*
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 06:12 AM
Feb 2014

no matter how hurtful, as a weapon against their discussion-board "enemies."

hlthe2b

(102,298 posts)
114. Wow... project much?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 10:05 PM
Feb 2014

One thing about those who project on to others their own misdeeds, is that their pattern is quickly recognized. Your pattern, Old and In the Way, has become legendary. And, that is surely no compliment.

Not to worry about making some vulgar response, I do believe in "ignore" and you clearly have earned a spot.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
123. But hostility toward a woman who shares heart renching personal experiences
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 11:14 PM
Feb 2014

that no one should have to ensure, you're down with that?

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
100. No what is disgusting
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:22 PM
Feb 2014

is people walking into a raw subthread like this and taking a big steaming shit right in the middle of it.

This is not the time or place to air your grievances.

Response to MadrasT (Reply #100)

boston bean

(36,222 posts)
65. Who the f*ck has been influencing you to think this is an ok thing
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:24 PM
Feb 2014

to say to someone after they just bared their soul to you?

I don't know if you are being influenced by others here but don't insist everyone has to be in total agreement with your views and most of all blaming the results of those disagreements as hostilities is pretty weird frankly.


Well, fuck, that has got to be one of the coldest, meanest responses I've read in a fucking long time.


Cleita

(75,480 posts)
70. Maybe it was, but that person, well the whole group has been pretty mean to me for a long time.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:29 PM
Feb 2014

What goes around comes around. It hasn't been just this thread. It goes back to others that I did in a light hearted manner and they all descend to alter the conversation with bull shit arguments and accusations. The LGBT community hasn't been much better. They accused me of being anti-gay on some things I was saying about the Pussy Riot debacle. I wasn't even thinking about any gay issues or trying to go out of my way to insult them. I think everyone has gone crazy here.

boston bean

(36,222 posts)
80. Is that the only reason, cause you just gave another upthread as to why
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:33 PM
Feb 2014

you think they are cruel to you.

Is it a multitude of reasons?

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
141. You know, I'm not sure I believe that you are sorry.
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 01:12 PM
Feb 2014

You reply to someone who lays her life open and keep right on attacking her positions. I'm far from impressed with your reply. It is merely a continuation of your previous negative posts to that DUer.

hlthe2b

(102,298 posts)
32. tremendous... How strong you have become to reveal all this, JTFrog
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:47 PM
Feb 2014

NO one can take that away from you. You are a tremendous example to many here.



MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
42. JTFrog I support you.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:55 PM
Feb 2014

And I am so sorry you have been met with such callous insensitivity and disregard here.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
46. Oh JT, I am standing up right next to you.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:02 PM
Feb 2014

It is abhorrent that so many people find it so easy to simply dismiss those they personally brand as somehow deserving being treated like shit ("unless you allow it" my fat Latina ass).

Please know you have far more allies here than you know. It's just that the callous libertarian(ish) chorus on du is on full blast lately.

I would back you up as my sister even if I didn't personally empathize with your pain, and also your hope for a better future for others.

For some women, the right to earn almost as much money for the same jobs as men is apparently enough.

For.them, the right to at least not be stoned to death for adultery is enough.

The right to wear bikinis is enough.

Etc, etc... they've settled. They've decided to accept sexual harassment and get annoyed when other women call it out. Ignore them.

I thank you for being as brave as you were, to share all of that here. I'm sorry you got such a cold, unfeeling response... but I'm not surprised.

Thank you also for helping to change the way society treats women. Thank you for not settling for "it wasn't enough" - we know we deserve freedom.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
85. I just got called to serve on a jury for this.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:38 PM
Feb 2014

Yes, something ACTUALLY alerted this.

Needless to say, I voted to leave it, and shame the Alerter as well.

And finally, you rock, JTFrog. That was beautiful.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
90. JTFrog baring her soul to the world, that one.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:45 PM
Feb 2014

Honestly, I don't know if I even want to post the results. Obviously, it was voted to leave it. I'll PM you.

Tanuki

(14,919 posts)
91. JTFrog, somebody tried to shut you up by alerting on this post! But the jury backed you up.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:46 PM
Feb 2014



On Thu Feb 20, 2014, 03:32 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

W.T.F.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4536619

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Over the top drama intended to insult, minimize and degrade other people - shameful, considering the topic. Please hide.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Feb 20, 2014, 03:42 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This appears to be alert-stalking. What is shameful is the relentless baiting the poster had been subjected to prior to writing the alerted-on post. I hardly recognize this place any more.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see nothing wrong with this post. It's an opinion. Considering the dismissive tone of the person the poster was responding to, I admire her restraint.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: My only objection to the alerted post is the lack of paragraph breaks. Other than that, I can't see the problem.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter should be ashamed. This was an incredibly powerful and painful testimony, so I'll forgive JTFrog some choice words to describe one of the most painful experiences of her life.

Needless to say, LEAVE IT.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
143. And neither posted an explanation of their vote, I see.
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 01:24 PM
Feb 2014

Typical. I can't imagine any possible reason to vote to hide JTFrog's post. Not one possible reason. Vile.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
145. That may be the most shameful alert that I've ever read here.
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 01:42 PM
Feb 2014

Holy Hell --two DUers voted to hide the post based on that.

boston bean

(36,222 posts)
146. The two posters accusing her of lying about it
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 01:45 PM
Feb 2014

were flagged for review overnight, for two hidden posts each in this thread last night........

They have been unflagged and are back as full active members as early as today.

I.don't.get.it.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
147. You know what? There are DUers I detest, ones I have sparred with forever,
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 02:00 PM
Feb 2014

ones who I believe are reflexive liars yet if one of them had made that post, the last thing that I'd do is call him/her a liar. Why? Because even if they were lying about their own experiences those things have happened to people that I know, people who spent years afraid to tell because they witnessed others being dismissed as liars when they told about rape and incest. I'm not going to add to their trauma.





R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
105. Powerful post, JT. Thank you for sharing this.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:46 PM
Feb 2014

I'm sorry you had to go through that. We're here for you.

Squinch

(50,956 posts)
117. This must have been so difficult to write.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 10:15 PM
Feb 2014

And beyond being infuriating, it is horrifying that your telling of your experience was met with such coldness and meanness.

I read your posts, and I am in awe of your control, and your strength.

I wish you peace. Be well.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
122. JTFrog
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 11:13 PM
Feb 2014

I'm so sorry you endured such horrific experiences, and I am also sorry that people here have respond with cruelty toward your story. I just want to say I support you. I respect your strength in sharing your personal story. That takes a lot of courage, particularly in this environment.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
59. Not a hostile environment?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:18 PM
Feb 2014

You sure aren't welcoming to JTFrog. First you willfully and deliberately distort the arguments many here have raised, then you hurl nsults when she points that out. If that's not hostile, what is?

By the way, the law defines a hostile environment, as based on the Civil Rights Law of 1964. The kind of pictures you claim are about what people "choose to wear' (a patently false distortion and factually wrong) is part of that environment. That is why they have been prohibited for decades in public spaces, non-profits, Democratic Party offices, and places of employment that follow the law. It's starting to wonder if some members here have held a job at any point in the past thirty years because you complain about what is standard practice in public spaces for decades. So yeah, progress and equal rights are a huge burden. You're just going to have to deal with it. It's part of the modern world. Of course. you could always band with the GOP to get those laws overturned. Or you can insist DU not follow practices intended to promote diversity and instead argue for a website that deliberately excludes the key constituencies of the Democratic Party, as the T and A threads and "soul food" thread, among others, were intended to do. Pretending deliberately hostile actions do not exclude is disingenuous, since there is decades of case law that shows they do. (see, for example, Jensen vs. Evelyth Taconite).

That you think swimsuit models choose their clothing is for photo shoots is pretty hysterical. Yeah, feminists here are all the time posting about women wearing too little clothing on beaches or out in public. Only they don't. People who make those arguments are generally blaming rape victims for their own assaults or shaming some pop star because they think she dress too "slutty." Ironically they are the very people who defend the swimsuit centerfolds being posted on DU. The key point is that men, not women, control how women are to be presented in public. It has nothing to do with women's choices. It is about explicitly denying women choices. Those same people argue that if women wear make up or high heels, objectification is their fault. They are asking for it. These issues are all about one issue--male control over public space and over women's bodies. (And not even all men, only a minority of men here who are angry at the progress of the past half century. Warren Stupidity's thread shows the majority of members believe those pics promote a hostile environment).


So you keep insulting people on this site who dare to care about equal rights, completely fabricate arguments they never articulated, and maintain your inane fantasies about the multi-billion dollar corporate media, which appears to mean more to you than the rights of your fellow Americans. You turn to personal attacks and create a cartoon caricature of an argument because you are either unwilling or unable to engage with ideas actually raised.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
63. Person already hurled insults to me on another thread. Sorry if I wasn't exactly welcoming on this
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:20 PM
Feb 2014

one.

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
94. You're still spreading misinformation about the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:48 PM
Feb 2014

That has NOTHING, and I mean NOTHING to do with private websites. It ONLY applies to schools, the workplace, public places like restaurants, motels, hotels, and the government. Is this website your workplace? Your school? No? Then it doesn't apply here.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
120. I was very clear
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 10:36 PM
Feb 2014

I am not spreading misinformation. The law regulates behavior and sets standards for diverse environments. I am not saying that not following it on DU violates the law. You are right that a website can exist only for straight, white, men if that is what it chooses to do. It could be a neo-Nazi site, or anything else it wants to be. However, it is called Democratic Underground and says one of its goals is to see Democrats elected. That assumes some sort of respect for people who actually vote for Democrats--the central constituencies being women and people of color. I am saying not following those standards shows a willful determination to create a hostile environment, which is of course the purpose of those posts. Got it? This is supposed to be a site for liberals, for Democrats. Diversity and inclusion should be a valued. To do otherwise is reactionary. You want to promote a reactionary space that only exists online, go for it. But don't for a minute pretend that it is anything but an ultra-reactionary and deliberately hostile effort to exclude women and people of color.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
127. She explained in detail. The real question is why you keep asking.
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 12:44 AM
Feb 2014

Why do you keep asking her to explain what she has already explained in detail?

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
130. You responded to my post, not BainsBane
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 01:02 AM
Feb 2014

My post asked you why you keep asking for an explanation about something already explained in detail. It was explained in detail in her post that you responded to. Did you not read it?

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
134. Because people claim to be liberals
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 03:11 AM
Feb 2014

Because they claim to be Democrats, which should entail valuing diversity. Clearly that is not the case for some who are openly hostile to diversity and seek to exclude anyone who doesn't share their mid-20th century view of the world. Because it points out there is conclusive legal evidence that such behavior is part of a pattern to intimidate and harass, which is indeed why those threads were posted.

This really shouldn't be too difficult to understand. Either one values equality and diversity or one doesn't. Clearly some people are openly hostile to both. That is evident in not only their ongoing defense of objectification but in their general opposition to equal opportunity and the concerns of feminists and people of color, and for some even LBGT members lately. Allowing a climate of intolerance means they become increasingly emboldened and develop an increasing sense of entitlement to express hostility toward the concerns and lives of anyone but themselves.


I explained my position here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4535510

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
15. What hostile atmosphere on this site?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 05:53 PM
Feb 2014

Provide links that show the hostility against women in the original SI swimsuit thread (started by a woman, by the way).

I can wait.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
45. when people enter an environment that includes many diverse perspectives
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:01 PM
Feb 2014

it is just common decency to behave with some kind of respect for everybody

posting that kind of shit NO MATTER WHO DOES IT is creating a hostile environment for some, one that would also be ILLEGAL in some situations (NO I am not making that claim for a website, don;t fucking intentionally "misread" what I wrote)

what is so fucking hard about understanding that images of mostly nude women posturing for sexual effect is NOT appropriate for a political discussion site???

go enjoy that somewhere else, it does not belong here.

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
50. Is it appropriate to display the swimsuit issue of SI in the checkout line at the store?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:05 PM
Feb 2014

Five stores I've been to in my town have them there.

Are they creating a hostile environment? How about on network tv when women are walking around in bikinis (e.g. The Bachelor)? Is that network being hostile?

That's a pathetic excuse.

Response to Vashta Nerada (Reply #50)

Kali

(55,014 posts)
68. yep, I am about finished too
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:27 PM
Feb 2014

sort of had a soft spot for this one due to a bit of an academic connection, but bleh

Kali

(55,014 posts)
54. so I take it that is a yes?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:11 PM
Feb 2014

it is appropriate to post sexual images of women on a political site? because I have news for you

the owner has this to say about it after stepping in to lock another stupid thread full of skin and breast tissue:

I know we allow lots of posts to remain in GD that are not strictly within the GD SOP. In the past, justified it by saying something like "if everyone is having a good time, don't spoil the fun." In my opinion this thread did not meet the GD SOP, and it wasn't fun. I don't particularly want to open the floodgates to bikini pictures in GD.

Hope that doesn't confuse matters. I know your job is difficult already.


Kali

(55,014 posts)
66. you have not answered the question
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:25 PM
Feb 2014

do you think it is appropriate to post sexual images of women on a political site?

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
71. Only when it's done in a sexual way.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:30 PM
Feb 2014

When the (WOMAN!) started the original swimsuit issue thread, she was celebrating 50 years of women athletes. It wasn't sexual at all.

It only became sexual when a certain contingent made it sexual.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
104. Do you have a link to where she said was celebrating 50 years of women athletes?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:44 PM
Feb 2014

Because she posted the pictures and just said, Wow. Those pictures of women in swimsuits that she posted -- they weren't athletes. So what was her "Wow" for?

Squinch

(50,956 posts)
119. Oh, Vashta, please. There is no part of you that believes that the point of that post was to
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 10:23 PM
Feb 2014

celebrate women athletes.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
133. you know what the problem is? it's you.
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 03:05 AM
Feb 2014

here's why:

this thread is about equality and justice for women, something completely lacking for almost all of history and only slightly remedied worldwide in the past decade.

and what do you want to talk about in a thread about this?

how you are somehow victimized that DU is a place to talk about these injusticies and not a place to post bikini photos.

the idea that you think this makes you a victim and the other is not worthy to talk about in a thread about injustice towards women shows what you actually consider an injustice and what you do not.

stop stinking up the thread and making men look bad.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
139. The lack of perspective is what really bugs me. As if being asked not to post cheesecake photos
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 06:28 AM
Feb 2014

in GD is not only a huge burden, but a form of injustice. How is it even worth the bandwidth and mental energy to make such posts?

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
21. I support this message *and*
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:13 PM
Feb 2014

would like to add the gentle reminder that there are more than two genders. And some people have no gender at all.

It would be improved by stating "all genders" (not "both" genders).

I believe a lot of problems begin with the root cause of viewing gender through a binary lens.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
24. For what its worth, many of us in the old spectrum of generations have had to
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:21 PM
Feb 2014

do some adjusting in how things are viewed. We grew up being taught the biology of two genders, now there are more. Thank you for the lesson but be gentle with those who are just catching up.

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
33. Preemptive tone policing.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:48 PM
Feb 2014

Gotta love it.

Wouldn't do to have those uppity transgender folks adding non-gentle reminders.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
38. after she dissed JTFrog's testimony. good gawd. the callousness. the cold.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:52 PM
Feb 2014

a fucking cold ass wind just blew by.

the calculating.

the fucking nasty.

sickening.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
48. well, playing nice doesn't always work
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 07:03 PM
Feb 2014

there is a lot of passive aggressive bullshit that needs calling out on occasion

ccpi

(2 posts)
101. Tarasha benjamin after 4 years
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:24 PM
Feb 2014

For Immediate release:
Tarasha Benjamin After 4 years---Should Feds Probe Missing Selma girl’s Disappearance

(National) Something—just doesn’t add up in the disappearance of Selma teenager Tarasha Benjamin’s missing person’s case. Benjamin, who turns 21 this year, was headed to the local Selma Flea market with her friend Telisha Givhan.
Both she and Gihvan got into the Mazda Tribute truck that Gihvan own. However, making just one stop a local barbershop, before the flea market, Gihvan offer Tarasha her truck after she claims that she had to do another young lady’s hair.
Benjamin was asked by Gihvan, according to sources, to drop her off by the local fire department were Gihvan got into another car with her sister n law, leaving Tarasha to drive her SUV along. Two hours later, the Mazda Tribute truck was abandoned on the Cecil Jackson bypass—a highway that leads to the local flea market. Benjamin was nowhere to be found.
After time had pass, Tarasha‘s Mother Regina Benjamin had call the Selma Police Department and a search was launch. Family and friends was passing out flyers and going door to door to search for the missing teen.

“The whole community searched for her after that. We were out on the streets-everywhere.” Benjamin told the Selma Times Journal newspaper.
The National Center for missing & Exploited Children had sent several rescue team to Selma and the search came up empty.
The Selma Police Department and its investigation unit headed by Sgt Tory Neely had determine foul play, but since then, had treated the case as a teenage runaway. However, photos of the crime scene, clear finger prints left on the SUV, No Amber Alert, and a host of reasons, had led some to believe Benjamin’s missing persons case was “boxed” from the beginning.
Investigators, including lead detective Ronald Jones, did little work in Benjamin’s case. When two eye witnesses came forward and said, “that they seem Tarasha get into the a black dodge charger, which was registered to Christopher Dukes, an associate of hers… and the second eye witness, a store clerk seen a person matching Dukes’ description, ... and seeing the young lady with him, the Selma Police department decided that one of the witness was mental.
It now seems as though the Selma Police Department are Psychologists, instead of law enforcement. In their own denial, they haven’t done little to anything to determine Benjamin’s case a “cold one.” And doing nothing seems to be their only way of trying to divert away from solving Tarasha’s case and expose the truth.
And there are reasons for their vigilance and avoidance of new leads, it was long rumored, That Tarasha was having “Dealings” with a Selma Police Officer. And she herself shares rumors about them.
Those rumors, May had prompted a direct visit from former Selma Police officer Bart Watkins. Watkins, who worked now as a deputy sheriff in Autauga County admits visiting Benjamin, but claim his visitation was official police business.
“I had nothing to do with that girl”. Watkins told investigators.
Watkins Told internal affairs investigators in Autauga, that he visited Tarasha to ask her about his colleague Christopher Harris, who was already charged by the Alabama Bureau of Investigations for raping a 12 year old girl.
Watkins was not elected as a Marengo County Sheriff’s Deputy after just one year, when the agency thought that he might have been linked to a police impersonation attack on a woman in that county as well.
Some of the details in that rape case by the news’ reports, matches similar activities that had happen in Benjamin’ case in Selma, where the public saw a state trooper on the bypass behind the SUV Tarasha was driving.

The victim in the Moreno county rape incident told the newspapers that her attacker was a white male and now there is some evidence that Dukes may have taken Tarasha’s to a white male, who was driving the trooper car.

Tarasha case had been featured on America’s most wanted’s website, The Maury Povich Show, Jet Magazine, and her picture profile is on the website of former CBS news Anchor Katie Couric.

But this, however, is not enough...The efforts now should be constant news reports and media coverage about her case as well as the FBI involvement.
Since the Alabama State Police had drop the ball on the case by refusing to show interest, the feds is the last hope in finding Tarasha and the truth as to what happen to her as well.





boston bean

(36,222 posts)
106. what a terrible set of circumstances.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:53 PM
Feb 2014

I hope the family can find justice. Thank you for posting about this and educating me.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
115. Unlike porno and magazine covers, you are talking about real women's issues. But those aren't as...
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 10:05 PM
Feb 2014

...interesting as puritanical diatribes regarding objectification of swimsuit models.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
126. I am all with you there, but
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 12:43 AM
Feb 2014

...a gender war has broken out in this thread too. Yep, usual suspects.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm against the gender wa...