Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:33 AM Feb 2014

Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations stall again

The Trans-Pacific Partnership trade disagreement talks continue to resemble a slow-motion train wreck, with the latest round of negotiations apparently stalled over agricultural subsidies.

According to Reuters, the latest round of talks in Singapore ground to a halt because America and Japan are butting heads over the latter's protectionist attitude towards rice, wheat and meat production.

However, the list of contentious points is larger than that, suggesting that in spite of sanguine statements from participants, movement behind closed doors remains slow. The New York Times states that intellectual property provisions remain controversial, along with rules covering state-owned enterprises and government procurement.

Hopes that an agreement would be ready for US President Barack Obama to wave around on a visit to the region in April appear to have been dashed, since the next meeting of ministers hasn't been scheduled.


http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/02/26/tpp_negotiations_stall_again/
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
4. Easy. The same way the Keystone pipeline benefits Americans and America.
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 01:15 AM
Feb 2014

It doesn't. Why would you even ask such a question? The question is how it benefits the richest people in the world. For that question, I can give you a credible explanation.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. Yet, we crucify Obama as if he's already sneaking it through Congress.
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 05:24 AM
Feb 2014

This agreement is far from complete.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
7. Congress has to approve fast track, and they won't.
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 06:13 AM
Feb 2014

Even then, Congress would still have to vote to approve agreement. Won't happen.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
8. So why is he even pushing for fast track?
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 08:45 AM
Feb 2014

Therein lies the problem. Even Harry Reid is uncomfortable with that, while the Republicans seem to be fine with it.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
9. Probably because it is very difficult to negotiate any agreement if the other folks don't think
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:10 PM
Feb 2014

you can get it approved. Might as well not even try.


I agree with what Obama said in SOTU -- "We need to work together on tools like bipartisan trade promotion authority to protect our workers, protect our environment, and open new markets to new goods stamped, ‘Made in the USA,’. . . . . . “Look, China and Europe aren’t standing on the sidelines. Neither should we.”

Obviously, that does not mean I support anything that comes out of any agreement, but it is smart to try to negotiate something.



Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
10. I saw the TPP debated in the Japanese Parliament
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 12:27 AM
Feb 2014

The left, or what's left of the left in Japan, is absolutely against it. The right-wingers are in favor of it.

Here is one reason why the Japanese left is against it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4424473

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trans-Pacific Partnership...