Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 08:24 AM Mar 2012

Anti-abortion activist says he would defeat Obama in Kansas

Anti-abortion activist Randall Terry said he’ll go to court to try to get his name on the ballot in the Kansas Democratic presidential caucus, a day after the state party determined he didn’t meet the qualifications.

Terry, who is running a quixotic campaign against President Obama with the stated goal of weakening the president in the November election, said keeping him off the ballot is a violation of the Constitution.

“The Supreme Court has already ruled you cannot have a litmus test of who can be a candidate and who can be a voter in a primary,” Terry said. “This is like Obama’s pretending he’s Fidel Castro, ‘I won the election and now I’m the only one you can vote for.’ ”

Terry, founder of the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue, is well-known in Kansas as a leader of the mammoth “Summer of Mercy” protests in Wichita in 1991.

Those demonstrations set Kansas on the long path to now having some of the nation’s tightest restrictions on abortion.


Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2012/03/22/3507613/abortion-foe-says-he-would-defeat.html#storylink=cpy

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anti-abortion activist says he would defeat Obama in Kansas (Original Post) proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 OP
Screw Randall Terry. Arkana Mar 2012 #1
There really needs a sanity test for public office. RC Mar 2012 #2
Ahhhhh. Hope I'm not the first to tell you this but Randall Terry is seriously deranged. n/t wandy Mar 2012 #3
The Democrats in Oklahoma kept him BlueToTheBone Mar 2012 #4
He is not on the ballot in Kansas proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #5
Good Fight! BlueToTheBone Mar 2012 #7
So, he wants to be president of Kansas? geardaddy Mar 2012 #6
Well, after costing Obama six votes in Kansas gratuitous Mar 2012 #8
I don't see how he can be right about that Supreme Court ruling hfojvt Mar 2012 #9
Exactly proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #10

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
4. The Democrats in Oklahoma kept him
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 09:42 AM
Mar 2012

off the ballot. I think they'll be able to keep him off in Kansas, too. Of course, it will cost money there by weakening the ability to support local candidates. I hope the national party fills in the gap.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
8. Well, after costing Obama six votes in Kansas
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 01:22 PM
Mar 2012

I'm sure the president's campaign would be mortally wounded.

I say let this nincompoop on the Democratic primary ballot, right after the state party passes a new rule that says all candidates have to pay $100,000 for the privilege of appearing on the ballot, the money to be refunded to the winner of the primary.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
9. I don't see how he can be right about that Supreme Court ruling
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 01:37 PM
Mar 2012

Many, many states have closed primarys. Thus, they have a litmus test about who can vote in a primary.

With the Kansas system, the potential is there, since we do same day registrations, for a bunch of Republicans to switch their registration for one day so they can caucus for Terry, especially since the Republicans are not having their caucus primary on the same day. Since we don't really have a contest, actual Democratic turnout is likely to be small. So a bunch of those dirty tricksters could give Terry a victory in Kansas.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anti-abortion activist sa...