Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 12:32 PM Mar 2012

Robert Fisk Makes Things Up

So, finally, Private Eye has published the stories that everybody has heard, but nobody has put in print.

Robert Fisk is widely thought to be a fantasist of Johann Hari-esque proportions.

Hugh Pope, a former Independent colleague of Fisk’s, recently published a memoir of his three decades of reporting in the Middle East, Dining with al Qaeda. When they were both covering the Iraqi Kurd refugee crisis in 1991, he writes, Fisk reported that Turkish troops were on a “rampage of looting”, stealing refugees’ “blankets, sheets and food”, and that British forces “cocked their weapons in a confrontation with the Turkish troops”.

For his book, Pope telephoned Fisk’s main named source, a British military doctor. He also spoke to a senior British diplomat who had run the relief operation in Turkey in 1991. “Both flatly denied there was anything near a clash and thought the charges of theft and tensions were sensationalised.” In a later account of the “clash”, Pope writes, Fisk “meticulously describes a flight to the refugee camp in the crew bay of an Apache helicopter. The trouble is, Apaches have no crew bay.”

When Pope’s book came out Ian Black, diplomatic editor of the Guardian, drily noted that he was “not the first journalist to wonder with envy and irritation how Fisk ‘managed to get an amazing sounding story from a dull day’”. Meanwhile the leading Egyptian blogger Issandr El Amrani noted that “if you hang around journalists with several decades of Middle East experience, particularly ones who were in Beirut in the 1980s, you keep hearing these stories again and again about Fisk”.

Indeed you do. “It has been common knowledge for years among British and American reporters that Bob can just make things up or lift others’ work without attribution and embellish it,” writes Jamie Dettmer, another former Middle East correspondent, in his review of Pope’s book. “I recall him doing it to me on a story in Kuwait about the killings of Palestinians at the hands of Kuwaitis following the liberation of the emirate. I remember also the time Fisk filed a datelined Cairo story about a riot there when he was in fact at the time in Cyprus.”


http://hurryupharry.org/2012/03/23/robert-fisk-makes-things-up/

55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Fisk Makes Things Up (Original Post) tabatha Mar 2012 OP
Another journalist has written: tabatha Mar 2012 #1
The crusade of character assassination against journalists you don't like continues. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2012 #2
I did not write the article. tabatha Mar 2012 #3
Fisk is rabidly pro-Palestinian anti-Israel and therefore beyond reproach on DU. aquart Mar 2012 #29
Yes, I do get angry when I see the same poster repeatededly dump scurrilous propaganda on this site. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2012 #42
And here is a response to the "double standards of the Western press". tabatha Mar 2012 #4
That's what I figured, too, but I didn't know what it could be. Peace Patriot Mar 2012 #5
Did you read #4? tabatha Mar 2012 #7
Someone needs to do their homework... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #6
The article mentioned was not a joke - it was serious. tabatha Mar 2012 #8
I think you'd better look at the link I gave you... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #9
I shall leave others to be the judge of that: tabatha Mar 2012 #10
You are linking to a David Horowitz rag to back this stuff up? Comrade Grumpy Mar 2012 #28
Lying liars, and the soft, comfortable, inhabitants of this internet who believe them. Colm McGinn Apr 2012 #55
Whilst The Eye is indeed a satirical magazine dipsydoodle Mar 2012 #16
Thanks for that- as you are in the UK, have you seen ANYTHING, other than Pope's blog BeHereNow Mar 2012 #20
Fisk probably will not respond - he does not "read Pope". tabatha Mar 2012 #23
This is first mention of it. dipsydoodle Mar 2012 #30
Thanks DipsyD... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #40
THANK YOU !!! tabatha Mar 2012 #21
Here is some more homework: tabatha Mar 2012 #11
And more: tabatha Mar 2012 #12
Find me some actual NEWS links to this story- there are none. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #13
Do you know what a link is? tabatha Mar 2012 #14
Why yes, I do! And I did! BeHereNow Mar 2012 #15
Pathetic. n/t EFerrari Mar 2012 #17
Exactly WHAT is pathetic. tabatha Mar 2012 #19
“I don’t read Hugh Pope” – Robert Fisk tabatha Mar 2012 #18
The board of Hugh Pope's "Crisis Group" is a who's who of neocons... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #22
Pope was talking about what he witnessed and what Fisk wrote. tabatha Mar 2012 #26
To not ask "Cui bono?" is foolish. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #31
So, you dismiss lies because of association? tabatha Mar 2012 #43
Jamie Dettmer...Cato Institute HACK. PassingFair Mar 2012 #46
Hills and Company...Tabatha, do you know who the Hills are? BeHereNow Mar 2012 #24
Read #26. I think you lack wisdom. tabatha Mar 2012 #27
And I think you did not answer the question. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #33
Oh, I have been waiting for that bastard to go down. aquart Mar 2012 #25
I think you must be confusing him with someone else? sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #35
The journalist profession seems to think highly of Mr. Fisk Comrade Grumpy Mar 2012 #32
CG- I looked into the backers of this smear campaign, noecons, all of them. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #36
Yes, he has received a lot of awards. tabatha Mar 2012 #37
I thought you admired Robert Fisk? The man is a superb journalist, it's despicable now that sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #34
The whole thing is a neocon operation- BeHereNow Mar 2012 #38
Fisk lied - THIRTY journalists went into Israel. tabatha Mar 2012 #41
Yes, I saw the name Dan Murphy, and thought it sounded familiar. sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #51
I am not smearing - I am reporting news. tabatha Mar 2012 #39
Do you consider Frontpage.com a reputable news source? Comrade Grumpy Mar 2012 #44
He wasn't lying on Al Jazeera, but an awful lot of lies ARE being told about everything sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #48
*** THIS IS MY FINAL COMMENT *** tabatha Mar 2012 #45
***YOU HAVE SPOKEN*** PassingFair Mar 2012 #47
Kudos, tabatha 11cents Mar 2012 #49
lol got root Mar 2012 #50
Excellent example 11cents Mar 2012 #54
Fisk's Egregious Plagerism The Fisker Mar 2012 #52
Oh horrors! He got a Chinook and Apache helicopter confused. Prometheus Bound Mar 2012 #53

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
1. Another journalist has written:
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 12:32 PM
Mar 2012


A certain Guardian photographer who would not describe as a friend to imperialism regaled me with stories about how snappers hated to work with him because the desk wanted to know why they hadn’t got any pictures of the amazing, heart-rending colour Fisk inserted into his copy. Answer.’ Because I did n’t see them, and I was with him the entire day from when we got up and had breakfast to when we got back to the hotel at night. Apart from when he was in the toilet, I suppose the massacre could have happened there.’


Yes. Yes, I suppose it could have.
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
2. The crusade of character assassination against journalists you don't like continues.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 01:31 PM
Mar 2012

How's that Nir Rosen smear coming?

This shit reeks of, I don't know, desperation? Fanaticism?

I guess Fisk offended the delicate sensibilities of some with his remarks about Colvin and the double standards of the Western press.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
3. I did not write the article.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:03 PM
Mar 2012

And as for Nir Rosen, I posted an article in his defense - i.e. I posted both sides of the story, as you well know, and have posted nothing since. How many people on this board have done that?

If you do not like what an article states, then take it up with the author or all of the journalists who have known Fisk far longer and better than you. They are stating their opinions based on actual events.

Thus your charge of character assassination is completely false.

And I was completely neutral with respect to Robert Fisk until a couple of weeks ago, when I heard an interview with him on Al Jazeera, where I was shocked when he lied about three different topics.

I think you have anger issues and cannot handle democracy where people write both positive and negative articles on a variety of subjects. That is the essence of democracy.

If there is an article that defends Robert Fisk, I will post that as well.

So keep your insults to yourself. The Robert Fisk article is all over the press, and thus there should be no problem posting it here.



 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
42. Yes, I do get angry when I see the same poster repeatededly dump scurrilous propaganda on this site.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:40 PM
Mar 2012

And then hide behind the likes of David Horowitz, Michelle Malkin, Geert Wilders and the rest of the Front Page crew.

There are other, unnamed, web sites that might find such crap more to their tastes.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
4. And here is a response to the "double standards of the Western press".
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:07 PM
Mar 2012
FISK ANALYSIS

MEMBERS of the Vulture Club, a closed Facebook group for foreign correspondents and aid workers, are circling the carcass of Robert Fisk, the Independent’s man in the Middle East, for his holier-than-thou rant against fellow war reporters following the Syrian Army’s murder of Marie Colvin and Remi Ochlik.

Condemning the “colonialist” assumption that “the lives of western reporters are somehow more precious, more deserving, more inherently valuable than those of the ‘foreign’ civilians who suffer around them”, Fisk accused Colvin’s editors and editors like them of pro-western double standards. “The newsrooms of London and Washington didn’t have quite the same enthusiasm to get their folk into Gaza as they did to get them into Homs,” he concluded.

As a matter of fact, western reporters did get round the Israeli army’s restrictions on journalists during its war with Hamas. Led by Bruno Stevens, a brave Belgian photographer, 30 found a way in over the Egyptian border. Fisk’s innuendo that foreign hacks were glory-hunters for exposing the deaths of Syrians, and hypocrites for ignoring the deaths of Palestinians, has put the war correspondents on the war path.

On the Vulture Club’s web page, Lulu Garcia-Navarro, foreign correspondent for America’s National Public Radio, describes Fisk’s article as “unconscionable”. Catherine Philp, US correspondent for the Times, says Fisk “makes it up”. Dan Murphy of the Christian Science Monitor tells of Fisk writing a piece attacking the Baghdad press corps for being “hotel journalists” who dared not go onto the streets, while rarely leaving the safety of the hotel pool himself.

http://www.private-eye.co.uk/sections.php?section_link=street_of_shame&issue=1310


Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
5. That's what I figured, too, but I didn't know what it could be.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:13 PM
Mar 2012

Do you have a link to his remarks about Colvin? And who is Colvin?

----

I just read an Associated Pukes alleged news article in which AP quite simply editorializes, for the entire article, listing all the reasons that the Pope shouldn't visit Cuba. They don't even bother to cite unnamed sources ("Critics of the Pope's planned visit...," or "An official in the State Department...".) There is no attribution at all to AP's opinion that the Pope shouldn't visit Cuba. They just say Cuba's bad this way, that way and the other, and argue against the Pope going there. The unnamed reporter argues! (It's an anonymous AP article.)

The "standards of the Western press" just keep getting worse and worse. Frankly, even with better-written examples of the Western press than AP--such as the New York Slimes or the Economyst--I don't believe anything they say any more--and I'm almost at the point of applying my rule of thumb for Bushwhacks: whatever they say, the opposite is true; and whatever they accuse others of, they are doing or planning to do--or in the case of so-called news sources, are providing the cover for, or are planning to provide the cover for.

I've just about had it with "the Western press." It is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the rich, the powerful and the conscienceless.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
7. Did you read #4?
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:21 PM
Mar 2012

The quote is there, and statement by the people who objected.

And do not lump all journalists into one category. As in all situations, there are good, bad and ugly.

Do not judge the good by the ugly.

I think you should read both #3 and #4, and then you may have more information, and more than one side..

And if you do not know who is Colvin, then you do not read much press anyway.

And as for Rosen is concerned, I posed both pro- and anti- articles. I challenge you to find many who do that here.

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
6. Someone needs to do their homework...
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:20 PM
Mar 2012
http://www.private-eye.co.uk/pages.php?page=about_us&issue=1310
"Private Eye is Britain's first, most successful and indeed only fortnightly satirical magazine. Founded in 1961, it has somehow managed to survive for half a century during which it has consistently entertained, informed and irritated its readers.
Over five turbulent decades it has developed its unique mix of jokes and journalism, comedy and campaigning, gags and gossip, laughter and libel, to cover the public life of the nation. From political plots to royal revelations, from City scandal to media manipulation, from legal lunacy to municipal madness. (That's enough alliteration – Ed)"

If "Harry" is using this satire as an attempt to discredit Fisk, he might want to rethink his
"source."



BHN

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
9. I think you'd better look at the link I gave you...
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:25 PM
Mar 2012

It is a SATIRE site.
It was NOT a serious article- it was intended as satire.
The site, Private Eye, is the UK version of ONN.

BHN

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
10. I shall leave others to be the judge of that:
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:33 PM
Mar 2012

You should read the comments here:
http://hurryupharry.org/2012/03/23/robert-fisk-makes-things-up/

Here is a different source:

Robert Fisk's 'Secrets' and Lies
By: Sean Gannon
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, June 14, 2007


On October 28th 2006, the London Independent published “Mystery of Israel’s Secret Uranium Bomb,” an article by its star Middle East reporter, Robert Fisk, which suggested that the Israeli army had deployed a “secret new uranium-based weapon in southern Lebanon” during its summer war against Hizballah.

Careful to avoid leveling direct accusations himself, Fisk built his case by quoting uncritically and at length the claims of Dr. Chris Busby, UK Green Party technology spokesman and scientific secretary of the European Committee on Radiation Risk, that evidence gathered from bomb craters at al-Khiam and At-Tiri indicated that the IDF had used either “some novel small experimental nuclear fission device or other experimental weapon (e.g. thermobaric weapon) … [or] a bunker-busting conventional uranium penetrator weapon employing enriched uranium.”

The result, the article intimated, would be a public health catastrophe in Lebanon on a par with the “plague of cancers” which Fisk, despite International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA) and World Health Organisation (WHO) findings to the contrary, maintains U.S. use of depleted uranium (DU) is causing in southern Iraq. Israeli denials of uranium-based munitions use in Lebanon were presented as inherently unreliable and “begging more questions than they answered.”

Curiously, Fisk made no mention of the October 12th report by the Amsterdam-based nuclear research and documentation centre, the Laka Foundation, which found “no reason to believe that DU weaponry has been used by Israel during the July/August 2006 war.” And in the months since his article’s publication he has remained resolutely silent on the series of other investigations which have comprehensively discredited the uranium bomb theory. For instance, one week after Fisk’s piece appeared, Lebanon’s National Council for Scientific Research (NCSR) declared that there were “no signs of radiation as a result of IDF bombing … uranium-based munitions were not used during the recent war.”

http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26988


It appears that a lot of journalists have problems with Fisk. I am just waking up to them now.
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
28. You are linking to a David Horowitz rag to back this stuff up?
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:21 PM
Mar 2012

If anyone thinks posting this hyper-Zionist tripe is going to make them more credible on this site, they need to rethink. It does help draw a fuller portrait of those who post it, though.

Really? David Horowitz? Michelle Malkin? Geert Wilders? Eurabia? Really?

Here's what else is on their home page:

Common Links:
•Columnist Archives
•David Horowitz Archives
•About David Horowitz
•David Horowitz Blog Archives

The War At Home And Abroad



China: Lean, Mean, Modern Fighting Machine
By: Matt Gurney
And Obama yawns. ....more

Why Are Jews Liberals?
By: David Forsmark
Norman Podhoretz asks, and answers, a provocative question. ....more

Netanyahu to UN: Don’t Go Back to the Dark Age
By: P. David Hornik
The bitterness behind the Israeli prime minister’s diplomatic spin. ....more

Is Glenn Beck Good for Conservatives? Round Two
By: Jamie Glazov
Horowitz v. Frum: Round Two ....more

The Three R's in the Age of Obama: Rappin', Revolution and Radicalism
By: Michelle Malkin

Politicized lessons supplant core academics. ....more
Collaborators in the War Against the Jews: Norman Finkelstein

By: John Perazzo
The next investigative article in a series Frontpage is running about collaborators in the Islamic war against the Jews. ....more

Obama’s Dangerous UN Agenda

By: Ben Johnson
Obama insulted his own country, promoted environmentalism, embraced unilateral disarmament, and declared counterterrorism a “law enforcement” matter. ....more
Geert Wilders' Fight

By: Véronique Chemla
Bat Ye'or is the world's foremost authority on dhimmitude and Eurabia. She is the author of Islam and Dhimmitude – Where Civilizations Collide. Her recent study, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, came out in a Hebrew version in 2008, while her next book will soon be published by an Italian publisher. ....more

Colm McGinn

(1 post)
55. Lying liars, and the soft, comfortable, inhabitants of this internet who believe them.
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 01:05 PM
Apr 2012

Lying liars, and the soft, comfortable, inhabitants of this internet who believe them.

The DU story has to be about DIME munitions (Dense Inert Metal Explosive). Very nasty stuff. Still a military/ trade secret as to the content, but seems to include a dust of heavy metal (either tungsten or DU?) contained in a carbon-fibre casing (a sphere), such that on detonation the metal powder behaves like a whirling saw blade, cutting peoples legs off, and while the initial mechanical injuries (with medical treatment) are survivable, people get sick & die because of whatever the metal is.

Real strong science there, tabatha. (For instance, one week after Fisk’s piece appeared, Lebanon’s National Council for Scientific Research (NCSR) declared that there were “no signs of radiation as a result of IDF bombing … uranium-based munitions were not used during the recent war.” )

And what or who floats Lebanon’s NCSR?

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
16. Whilst The Eye is indeed a satirical magazine
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:58 PM
Mar 2012

Not everything they write is satire - some is brutally factual. But then everyone here in the UK knows that. I wouldn't agree it irritates its readers. If it did so they simply wouldn't buy it.

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
20. Thanks for that- as you are in the UK, have you seen ANYTHING, other than Pope's blog
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:03 PM
Mar 2012

from which the entire text is lifted, btw, that confirms
any reliable sources in the accusations made?
I can't.

Also, do you know if Fisk has responded?

In advance, thanks!
BHN

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
30. This is first mention of it.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:22 PM
Mar 2012

I have no knowledge of Pope and neither do I do know if Fisk has responded - he may simply have chosen to ignore it. There may be some elements of truth in there but overall I wouldn't dismiss Fisk as a result.

When you've time go here and check out Private Eye's covers since it first started back in 1961.
http://www.private-eye.co.uk/covers.php

Occasional references you see here to the Telegraph/Torygraph, Guardian / Grauniad , etc all originate from Private Eye. Misspelling of the Guardian's name came about from awful inability to proof read years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Eye

Some years I posted the title of one of their old cartoons here and got into trouble as a result. All that actually achieved was Free Republic re-printing all of the chatter on the subject.

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
40. Thanks DipsyD...
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:33 PM
Mar 2012

Just one look at Pope's "Crisis" board members told me everything I
needed to know about the situation.

I appreciate your taking the time to respond though!

BHN

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
11. Here is some more homework:
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:37 PM
Mar 2012

Thursday, March 01, 2012
Again and again: when Robert Fisk pretends he knows Arabic
Tons of reader sent me this and people are mocking him all over the internet. Why does not he retire at long last? Why does he insist on embarrassing himself by wild exaggerations and pretensions. Here, he wanted to show off his (non-existent) Arabic, and he fell flat on his face: "So it's the "cleaning" of Baba Amr now, is it? "Tingheef" in Arabic." Tingheef, Mr. Fisk? Tingheef, Mr. Fisk? Is that Azari or Arabic? (thanks Salam and many other readers)
Posted by As'ad AbuKhalil at 7:20 AM

Labels: English

http://angryarab.blogspot.com/search?q=fisk&max-results=20&by-date=true

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
12. And more:
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:38 PM
Mar 2012

Sunday, February 12, 2012
Fisk
What is this guy saying? Who cares what he is saying? Does he know what he is saying? What kind of reportage is this? What does his/her editor think when she/her receives such dispatches? (thanks Amer)
Posted by As'ad AbuKhalil at 7:21 AM

http://angryarab.blogspot.com/search?q=fisk&max-results=20&by-date=true

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
13. Find me some actual NEWS links to this story- there are none.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:48 PM
Mar 2012

Go ahead- do a search.
2 results- DU and HurryupHarry.

None of the news sources cited have any links about it.


BHN

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
14. Do you know what a link is?
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:52 PM
Mar 2012

Look and find.

And I did not do a search - I read the comments below the link I gave you above. Try reading the comments - they are very telling.

And you are not paying attention to the substance or what is being said. You are just trying to take attention away from what other journalists are stating. If I had the time, I would summarize the statements and the authors, but you do the reading yourself. If you don't want to learn, then that is up to you. You are quite silly and specious.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
18. “I don’t read Hugh Pope” – Robert Fisk
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:02 PM
Mar 2012
Sometimes something can worry you for years, and you don’t quite know what to do about it. Robert Fisk’s writing is one of those things for me. His stories are compellingly fluent, fabulously channel Middle Eastern victimhood, and satisfyingly cast grit in the eye of Western governments’ hypocrisy. And yet against this I always have to set my experience that, in one case that is personally important to me, the swirl of rumours about Fisk’s cavalier treatment of facts seems to be true.

My particular assertion about Robert Fisk’s journalism comes in a chapter of Dining with al-Qaeda devoted to the question of accuracy in Middle Eastern reporting (pages 20-27). It relates to an episode during the 1991 Iraqi Kurd refugee crisis on the mountains of the Turkish-Iraqi border. A piece by Fisk said that Turkish troops were on a “rampage of looting” stealing Iraqi Kurd refugees’ “blankets, sheets and food”. This, according to him, had led to a near-armed clash between Turkish and British troops. Fisk’s report gravely set back Turkish-allied cooperation in the relief effort. Fisk was expelled and I was ordered out too, since I worked for the same newspaper, Britain’s Independent. I was later reprieved, partly because I had nothing to do with the story. I had been back in Istanbul, writing up my own experiences of the refugee camps.

While putting together Dining with al-Qaeda, I telephoned Fisk’s main named source in those mountains, a British military doctor. To make sure, I also contacted a senior British diplomat in charge in those days, now in retirement. Both flatly denied there was anything near a clash and thought the charges of theft and tensions were sensationalized. Moreover, I noted inconsistencies between Fisk’s accounts in the newspaper and in his memoir (The Great War for Civilization, 2005). For instance, in a major narrative section of his book that is absent from the original article, Fisk meticulously describes a flight to the refugee camp in the crew bay of an Apache helicopter. The trouble is, Apaches have no crew bay.

I had shrunk from confronting Fisk in person with my findings. Most journalists hate publicly accusing each other of making things up – after all, one might oneself be found to have made a slip in a race to a deadline. A major British journalist told me he’d liked Dining with al-Qaeda, but couldn’t review it because it meant making a choice between Fisk (seven times named Britain’s ‘International Reporter of the Year’ ) and me (last known award: my school’s poetry prize). The Guardian’s Ian Black put it coyly in his review that “Pope bravely tackles the reputation of his onetime Independent colleague Robert Fisk … he is not the first journalist to wonder with envy and irritation how Fisk ‘managed to get an amazing sounding story from a dull day …’”. As leading Egyptian blogger Issandr El Amrani said in a review: “Fisk’s over-active imagination makes it easy for Pope to find holes in his reporting … If you hang around journalists with several decades of Middle East experience, particularly ones who were in Beirut in the 1980s, you keep hearing these stories again and again about Fisk. It’s a great, great shame that this otherwise powerful writer keeps on doing that.”

http://hughpope.wordpress.com/2011/11/20/i-dont-read-hugh-pope-robert-fisk/


Comment at this article

I do read Hugh Pope… I had the privilege to work with Hugh Pope when he was starting out in journalism with United Press International in Beirut in the 1970s. And I lived in the same building where Bob Fisk lived and i believe still lives. As Hugh Pope mentions in the above note, one tries to avoid telling stories on one’s colleagues.. I used to run into Fisk in various places one goes to in a war zone; the demarcation line along Beirut’s Green Line on either the Muslim/Palestinian/leftist side or on the Christian side; in the squalid refugee camps that ringed Beirut or yet in some of the villages and towns of South Lebanon, frequent targets of Israel’s retaliation raids.

A day or two later I would read Fisk’s reports of events I and other colleagues had been to. And more often than not Robert Fisk’s description of these events were very different from what either myself or my colleagues had witnessed. Eventually i stopped reading Robert Fisk.

In his interview on Turkish TV Bob Fisk stated that he does not read Hugh Pope. Maybe Mr. Fisk’s reporting might have been somewhat more in line with what unbiased journalism should be had be bothered to read Hugh Pope.
Claude Salhani is the author of three books: Black September to Desert Storm; While the Arab World Slept; the impact of the Bush years on the Middle East, and Islam Without a Veil.


Another comment:

I read Hugh Pope too. I’ve also had the privilege of working closely with him over the years and his character and veracity are beyond reproach. Any question of his word against Mr. Fisk’s – or anyone else, for that matter – is no contest.
Stephen Glain, journalist and author


This is not a satirical site or a satirical author.

So giggle away with childish glee, and avoid the underlying theme of all of these statements.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
26. Pope was talking about what he witnessed and what Fisk wrote.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:19 PM
Mar 2012

Pope has stated he found it very hard to criticize fellow journalists - but he did follow up on two of Fisk's sources and they did not pan out. There are other journalists in the link in the OP that report the same thing - Fisk's exaggerations. The links to the Angry Arab were to illustrate even the people who Fisk generally supports do not find him credible.

You are trying all kinds of tactics to dismiss what he said.

I read some articles on Kofi Annan today that were written by neocons, and I was tending toward dismissing them because they were from neocons - but I researched some of the facts, and they were on the money.

Not everything from the right is wrong, and not everything from the left is right, and to assume so is very foolish.

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
31. To not ask "Cui bono?" is foolish.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:22 PM
Mar 2012

Sorry, I have a tendency to look behind the curtain
before I buy everything I read on the "internets."

That's just me.

BHN

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
43. So, you dismiss lies because of association?
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:41 PM
Mar 2012

Some non bias there.

You do not convince - and the proof will be in the pudding.

PassingFair

(22,434 posts)
46. Jamie Dettmer...Cato Institute HACK.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:58 PM
Mar 2012

"Indeed you do. “It has been common knowledge for years among British and American reporters that Bob can just make things up or lift others’ work without attribution and embellish it,” writes Jamie Dettmer, another former Middle East correspondent, in his review of Pope’s book. “I recall him doing it to me on a story in Kuwait about the killings of Palestinians at the hands of Kuwaitis following the liberation of the emirate. I remember also the time Fisk filed a datelined Cairo story about a riot there when he was in fact at the time in Cyprus.”

http://www.potomacflacks.com/pf/2006/10/flack_profile_j_2.html

Unless this is another Jamie Dettmer, Middle East correspondent!

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
24. Hills and Company...Tabatha, do you know who the Hills are?
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:15 PM
Mar 2012
http://hillsandco.com/

I think you should look at their client list and I also
think you are in over your head on this one.

Respectfully, none the less,
BHN

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
33. And I think you did not answer the question.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:26 PM
Mar 2012

Do you know WHO the Hills are?

I am done- I can not have a discussion of any meaning with you
when you have no background knowledge in the matter.
Nothing personal, I just know from experience this
conversation is going in circles and there are other threads
that I find far more worth while.

Carry on, w/out me,
Thanks-
BHN

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
35. I think you must be confusing him with someone else?
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:28 PM
Mar 2012

Did you think he was a bastard during the Bush years when he used his journalistic skills to tell the truth about Bush's lies? Was he making stuff up then, did he win all those awards for 'making stuff up'?

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
32. The journalist profession seems to think highly of Mr. Fisk
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:25 PM
Mar 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Fisk#Awards

Awards

In 1991, Fisk won a Jacob's Award for his RTÉ Radio coverage of the first Gulf War.[33] He received Amnesty International UK Press Awards in 1998 for his reports from Algeria and again in 2000 for his articles on the NATO air campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999. In 1999, Fisk won the Orwell Prize for journalism.[34]

He has received the British Press Awards' International Journalist of the Year seven times, and twice won its "Reporter of the Year" award.[35] In 2001, he was awarded the David Watt Prize for "outstanding contributions towards the clarification of political issues and the promotion of their greater understanding" for his investigation into the Armenian Genocide by the Turks in 1915.[36] In 2002 he was the fourth recipient of the Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism. More recently, Fisk was awarded the 2006 Lannan Cultural Freedom Prize along with $350,000.[37]

He was made an honorary Doctor of Laws by the University of St Andrews on 24 June 2004. The Political and Social Sciences department of Ghent University (Belgium) awarded Fisk an honorary doctorate on 24 March 2006. He was awarded an honorary doctorate by the American University of Beirut in June 2006. Trinity College Dublin awarded him a second, honorary, Doctorate in July 2008.[38]

Fisk gave the 2005 Edward Said Memorial lecture at Adelaide University.[39]

In 2011, Fisk was awarded the International Prize at the Amalfi Coast Media Awards in Italy.[40]

Fisk is also a recipient of the College Historical Society's "Gold Medal for Outstanding Contribution to Public Discourse".[citation needed]

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
36. CG- I looked into the backers of this smear campaign, noecons, all of them.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:28 PM
Mar 2012

Of course it is in their interest to launch a smear campaign against Mr. Fisk.
Trying to discuss the background is pointless though, so don't waste
your time.
Just my friendly advice,
BHN

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
37. Yes, he has received a lot of awards.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:30 PM
Mar 2012
However, that is probably because journalists are loathe to criticize other journalists.

What has created this storm, is that Fisk cricitized other journalists --- falsely.


Condemning the “colonialist” assumption that “the lives of western reporters are somehow more precious, more deserving, more inherently valuable than those of the ‘foreign’ civilians who suffer around them”, Fisk accused Colvin’s editors and editors like them of pro-western double standards. “The newsrooms of London and Washington didn’t have quite the same enthusiasm to get their folk into Gaza as they did to get them into Homs,” he concluded. “Just a thought.”

As a matter of fact, western reporters did get round the Israeli army’s restrictions on journalists during its war with Hamas. Led by Bruno Stevens, a brave Belgian photographer, 30 found a way in over the Egyptian border. Fisk’s innuendo that foreign hacks were glory-hunters for exposing the deaths of Syrians, and hypocrites for ignoring the deaths of Palestinians, has put the war correspondents on the war path.

On the Vulture Club’s web page, Lulu Garcia-Navarro, foreign correspondent for America’s National Public Radio, describes Fisk’s article as “unconscionable”. Catherine Philp, US correspondent for the Times, says Fisk “makes it up”. Dan Murphy of the Christian Science Monitor tells of Fisk writing a piece attacking the Baghdad press corps for being “hotel journalists” who dared not go onto the streets, while rarely leaving the safety of the hotel pool himself.


Read up about the Vulture Club ----

I was puzzled. Just two weeks before, my friend Tim and I had left eastern Libya, and he had said he wasn't going back. So I chatted back, "Tim who? Not Hetherington?" And then, at 16:58, the words I never wanted to see popped up from André: "Yes. He died now. Just now. Chris also bad." And that was how the first word of Tim's death, and the eventually life-ending injury of his fellow photographer Chris Hondros, reached the world: on Skype.

André, Tim, and I were members a close-knit, but informal brotherhood -- I half-jokingly call us the Vulture Club, as we usually convene only when the blood is flowing. Bonds forged in war run deep. Many of us have known each other since the bloodshed in the Balkans in the 1990s, although there are a few older ones around who still think of us as "the kids" (and we tease them right back about their arthritis and fading hearing, the later an inevitable result of being too close too many times to the bomb explosions). My emergency team at Human Rights Watch spends a lot of time in conflict zones with these journalists and photographers, so we feel a special connection.

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/04/26/the_vulture_club




sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
34. I thought you admired Robert Fisk? The man is a superb journalist, it's despicable now that
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:26 PM
Mar 2012

anyone would make such a transparent effort to smear someone of his reputation, but it does demonstrate why many of our journalists remain silent.

When someone reports the truth rather than the propaganda prepared for them, they WILL be targeted. We've seen it so many times before.

Sorry that Fisk is unwilling to get in line with the latest propaganda, he never was.

I guess you now believe he made up all that stuff you so admired him for in the past??

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
38. The whole thing is a neocon operation-
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:31 PM
Mar 2012

Check out some of my links on the background.
There will always be some who cling to something as truth,
even when provided evidence to the contrary.
Me?
I'm outta here!

See you on the "internets" highway Sabrina!

BHN

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
51. Yes, I saw the name Dan Murphy, and thought it sounded familiar.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 08:38 PM
Mar 2012

Not going to waste time on this, but I will say he is a consistent propagandist against almost everything and everyone who has challenged the Neocon agenda. Wikileaks, Assange, etc. Just recently he tried to diminish the importance of the release of emails from Stratfor. Reading his diatribe you could almost feel his desperation to do his job of covering for the PTBs.

Fisk is so well-respected that when he writes something it carries weight. His comments about the 'hotel journalists' was dead right, as we all remember from the Bush era. Now, laughably, they are attempting to tell us that we actually got news from Iraq and Fisk was lying. He wasn't the only one, unfortunately for them.

Any journalists allowed into these warzones are generally approved of and/or embedded with the military. And we all know how much they were allowed to see, and if they saw something not beneficial to the war machine (ask Ashley Banfield) it didn't get published.

This looks like a classic smear job. They are in the middle of trying to carry out their PNAC agenda, and Fisk is desperately, as he did re Iraq, trying to expose them. Naturally they are going to try to smear him. Not fooled. And I doubt too many others will be either.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
39. I am not smearing - I am reporting news.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:33 PM
Mar 2012

You have no problem criticizing. Your posts have shown that many times.

I have NEVER uttered a word for or against Robert Fisk, before a couple weeks ago, when I heard him lying on AL Jazeera.

Then I came across the OP article. I would not have posted another thing, except from the ridicule it has received.

There is NO discussion on facts - there is only laughter at a satire society that does report serious articles, and smearing because association with the right.

Nothing about the facts of the case. I am somewhat disgusted.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
48. He wasn't lying on Al Jazeera, but an awful lot of lies ARE being told about everything
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 07:56 PM
Mar 2012

has gone on from Iraq, to Afghanistan to Libya and to Bahrain, Syria and I think we have figured out who is behind a lot of those lies. Unfortunately many, many people have been murdered as a result of the interference in these countries, and still are being murdered and the last thing any of them need is to have those responsible for most of the bloodshed coming in to 'save' them. Like Iraq, like Afghanistan and like Libya and the next on the PNAC list, Iran, Lebanon, Syria.

Fisk knows what is going on and now they are doing what they always try to do. But his reputation, not to mention that the majority of the people of the world, know pretty much what is going on, will make their vile attempts to destroy yet another person who gets in their way, impossible.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
45. *** THIS IS MY FINAL COMMENT ***
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:55 PM
Mar 2012

I have been spending a lot of time on international blogs on various subjects concerning the ME.

I have been devastated (but understanding) how people in ME have been so put off by everything that the US does because of Iraq and Afghanistan.

They cannot lift the bias and appreciate when positive things are done. E.g. Obama getting out of Iraq.

I have seen some of that here today - everything associated with neocons is dismissed, even if there is truth in the statement.

The independent people who did not confirm Fisk's story about Turkey probably have no association with neocons at all, yet their words are being dismissed as false because of bias.

I have taught myself from South African days to NEVER let bias form my opinion from stereotypes - not all Afrikaners were bad, etc.

I was reading the FACTS of the claims - Fisk's Turkey story was bunkum, because Pope went to the trouble of checking Fisk's sources. Fisk's claims about Israel was wrong, too - 30 journalists went in.

Journalists have been incensed by Fisk's charges - I look forward to more comments from them. But I doubt I will post them here.

The initial response was hilarity at a satire site, despite the fact that the satire site also posts critical pieces.

That tells me all I need to know about serious consideration of statements by journalists. There is none. Every angle to dismiss without consideration of the subject matter is the norm.





11cents

(1,777 posts)
49. Kudos, tabatha
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 08:08 PM
Mar 2012

I don't always agree with you, but I admire your ability to disentangle inconvenient facts from ideological packaging. If Fisk has a history of lying which can be confirmed by other reporters, it simply doesn't matter whether the author of this or that anti-Fisk article has neo-con ties. If you have intellectual standards, you deal with facts; if you don't, you use irrelevancies to swat them away.

It's pretty clear at any rate that Fisk's response to the Arab uprisings has cratered what remained of his reputation amongst other foreign correspondents.

11cents

(1,777 posts)
54. Excellent example
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 12:53 PM
Mar 2012

Inconvenient facts and arguments are lol'ed away. It's the Fox News viewers' mentality. If it doesn't support my agenda and preconceptions, if it doesn't prop up my tribe, it doesn't exist and needn't be responded to.

I've seen how Fisk's responses to the Arab uprisings, in particular his apologetics for the Assad regime, have made even his former admirers wonder if he's just lost it, or if they'd misjudged him all along. Journalists really don't like calling each other out, but if Fisk attacks the people who've been covering for him he'll go the way of Johann Hari.

The Fisker

(1 post)
52. Fisk's Egregious Plagerism
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 04:35 AM
Mar 2012

Robert Fisk is a fantasist and plagarist. Nothing more. The internet is repleate with examples of his plagarism. Here is just one case that is particularly disturbing

Janet Lee Stevens can hardly be accused on being a Zionist. She with Amensty International in Lebanon and witness a to at Sabra and Shatila who was later killed by Hezbollah when they bombed the US Embassy in Beirut. She wrote of her first hand experience of the massace to Franklin Lamb the father of their unborn child.

http://palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=15900

This is what she wrote to him:

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/997/special.htm#1

<i><b>"I saw dead women in their houses with their skirts up to their waists and their legs spread apart; dozens of young men shot after being lined up against an alley wall; children with their throats slit, a pregnant woman with her stomach chopped open, her eyes still wide open, her blackened face silently screaming in horror; countless babies and toddlers who had been stabbed or ripped apart and who had been thrown into garbage piles."</b></i>

And this is Fisk's plagerisation of the above text, in his 'eyewitness' report

http://www.countercurrents.org/pa-fisk180903.htm

<i>Jenkins and Tveit were so overwhelmed by what we found in Chatila that at first we were unable to register our own shock. Bill Foley of AP had come with us. All he could say as he walked round was "Jesus Christ" over and over again. We might have accepted evidence of a few murders; even dozens of bodies, killed in the heat of combat. <b>But there were women lying in houses with their skirts torn torn up to their waists and their legs wide apart, children with their throats cut, rows of young men shot in the back after being lined up at an execution wall. There were babies - blackened babies babies because they had been slaughtered more than 24-hours earlier and their small bodies were already in a state of decomposition - tossed into rubbish heaps alongside discarded US army ration tins, Israeli army equipment and empty bottles of whiskey.</b></i>


Prometheus Bound

(3,489 posts)
53. Oh horrors! He got a Chinook and Apache helicopter confused.
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 08:04 AM
Mar 2012

And two unnamed people allegedly disagreed with him about a story.

Oh, and a blogger says he's heard rumours about him.

That's some powerful stuff!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Fisk Makes Things ...