Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWill the US break Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery's Rule One?
The US has broken the second rule of war. That is, don't go fighting with your land army on the mainland of Asia. Rule One is don't march on Moscow. I developed these two rules myself.
In the House of Lords on American policy in Vietnam, 1962.
Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: "Do not march on Moscow". Various people have tried it, Napoleon and Hitler, and it is no good. That is the first rule. I do not know whether your Lordships will know Rule 2 of war. It is: "Do not go fighting with your land armies in China". It is a vast country, with no clearly defined objectives.
In the House of Lords, 30 May 1962 (Hansard, Col. 227)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 4735 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will the US break Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery's Rule One? (Original Post)
FarCenter
Mar 2014
OP
No, no, no. Montgomery has it all wrong. Vizzini explained what the classic blunders are. . .
Journeyman
Mar 2014
#5
Yeah...but what if the Man in Black had gone up against Michael Corleone, instead of Vizzini?
First Speaker
Mar 2014
#7
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)1. Not to worry.
The US isn't going to war with Russia over the Crimea. It would take something much bigger than that to lead to war.
AnalystInParadise
(1,832 posts)2. GAH!!!!
Who are these people on DU that think we would even consider war with Russia. Seriously.......how on earth are you quantifying this?
whistler162
(11,155 posts)3. Obviously the sameones who think.....
Monty is a go to guy for military advise!
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)6. How about MacArthur?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)8. Excellent point. nt
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,221 posts)4. Seriously?
Are there those on this board that advocate war? Guess I haven't seen it yet.
Journeyman
(15,041 posts)5. No, no, no. Montgomery has it all wrong. Vizzini explained what the classic blunders are. . .
Vizzini:
Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in a land war in Asia" -- but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line"! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha...
(Vizzini stops suddenly, his smile frozen on his face and falls to the ground dead)
Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in a land war in Asia" -- but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line"! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha...
(Vizzini stops suddenly, his smile frozen on his face and falls to the ground dead)
Vizzini, in the "battle of wits" against the Man in Black
The Princess Bride (1987)
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)7. Yeah...but what if the Man in Black had gone up against Michael Corleone, instead of Vizzini?
...then, maybe the rule would have proven correct...
winstars
(4,220 posts)9. Inconceivable!!!
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)10. .
rafeh1
(385 posts)11. the west point restatement
1. motherhood
2. apple pie
3. no land war in asia
there is no liberating russia either. we are not a land power we are a naval power our primary interest lies in the permanent de unification of europe. ie no one power runs europe which mirrors uk ergo the common interests.