General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDrug company will give ailing 7-year-old medicine that could save him
After days of pleading with drug company executives, Josh Hardy's parents got what they'd been praying for: a chance to get medicine that could help their son survive.
The Chimerix pharmaceutical company said Tuesday that the ailing 7-year-old will receive medicine that doctors hope will help him when he becomes the first patient in a new trial set to start Wednesday.
Todd Hardy, Josh's father, said he got the call from Chimerix president Kenneth Moch about a half hour before the public announcement was made.
"It was wonderful," Hardy said. "Truly wonderful. It was overwhelming."
<snip>
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/health/josh-hardy-drug-study/
Aristus
(66,388 posts)significantly.
dilby
(2,273 posts)Then the company will probably never go to market.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)It seems that shaming these companies into doing the right thing has become a lot easier to do thanks to the internet and social media. I would encourage everyone to take note.
tridim
(45,358 posts)And just starting to be used regularly.
IMO it's one reason why the GOP is falling. They can't stop the Internet BS detector.
jsr
(7,712 posts)Only after much adverse publicity and persistent begging from the family.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)"Todd Hardy hailed Moch as a hero.
"He's a super man. He worked diligently on behalf of everybody," Hardy said. "His integrity was unquestioned. He was utterly professional.""
We don't know what went on behind the scenes. Note that somebody had to get FDA approval, and that the little boy will be the first use in a new trial.
I'm not going to vilify the CEO who had said no and then said yes, based on media reports.
1awake
(1,494 posts)And the CEO called me, I would feel complete joy and gratitude. Later, it might be a different story but facing losing a child can be very powerful.
Note this is not in defense of the company at all. Just a simple assessment of what my emotions might look like at that point in time.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)I would not want to be in that CEO's shoes. There are powerful ethical considerations involved. The drug has not be tested or tried in children, so no data on dosing, etc. There is nothing that says it won't kill the boy before his disease does. When they pull the limited supply out of the planned testing, it slows down FDA approval, which means that one or more lives who could be saved down the road won't be, and that is based on a gamble.
At least by putting within the context of a trial, regardless of this outcome, the information learned will go toward saving additional lives down the road.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)Isn't that the best policy always?
Response to cali (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed