Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 10:16 AM Mar 2014

Drug company will give ailing 7-year-old medicine that could save him

After days of pleading with drug company executives, Josh Hardy's parents got what they'd been praying for: a chance to get medicine that could help their son survive.

The Chimerix pharmaceutical company said Tuesday that the ailing 7-year-old will receive medicine that doctors hope will help him when he becomes the first patient in a new trial set to start Wednesday.

Todd Hardy, Josh's father, said he got the call from Chimerix president Kenneth Moch about a half hour before the public announcement was made.

"It was wonderful," Hardy said. "Truly wonderful. It was overwhelming."

<snip>

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/health/josh-hardy-drug-study/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Drug company will give ailing 7-year-old medicine that could save him (Original Post) cali Mar 2014 OP
The positive PR the company will get for this gesture will outweigh the cost of the medicine Aristus Mar 2014 #1
Unless the kids dies. dilby Mar 2014 #6
That's wonderful news leftynyc Mar 2014 #2
Yep, public shaming/ridicule is a killer app IMO. It's super powerful. tridim Mar 2014 #4
So the great man decided to spare the little boy's life jsr Mar 2014 #3
the little boy's father called the great man a hero magical thyme Mar 2014 #5
I think if my son was laying there dying 1awake Mar 2014 #7
We all would. magical thyme Mar 2014 #9
I think the important thing is to focus on the negative. Orrex Mar 2014 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #8
This is good news Gothmog Mar 2014 #11

Aristus

(66,388 posts)
1. The positive PR the company will get for this gesture will outweigh the cost of the medicine
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 10:19 AM
Mar 2014

significantly.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
2. That's wonderful news
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 10:20 AM
Mar 2014

It seems that shaming these companies into doing the right thing has become a lot easier to do thanks to the internet and social media. I would encourage everyone to take note.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
4. Yep, public shaming/ridicule is a killer app IMO. It's super powerful.
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 10:31 AM
Mar 2014

And just starting to be used regularly.

IMO it's one reason why the GOP is falling. They can't stop the Internet BS detector.

jsr

(7,712 posts)
3. So the great man decided to spare the little boy's life
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 10:25 AM
Mar 2014

Only after much adverse publicity and persistent begging from the family.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
5. the little boy's father called the great man a hero
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 10:33 AM
Mar 2014

"Todd Hardy hailed Moch as a hero.

"He's a super man. He worked diligently on behalf of everybody," Hardy said. "His integrity was unquestioned. He was utterly professional.""

We don't know what went on behind the scenes. Note that somebody had to get FDA approval, and that the little boy will be the first use in a new trial.

I'm not going to vilify the CEO who had said no and then said yes, based on media reports.

1awake

(1,494 posts)
7. I think if my son was laying there dying
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 11:31 AM
Mar 2014

And the CEO called me, I would feel complete joy and gratitude. Later, it might be a different story but facing losing a child can be very powerful.

Note this is not in defense of the company at all. Just a simple assessment of what my emotions might look like at that point in time.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
9. We all would.
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 12:08 PM
Mar 2014

I would not want to be in that CEO's shoes. There are powerful ethical considerations involved. The drug has not be tested or tried in children, so no data on dosing, etc. There is nothing that says it won't kill the boy before his disease does. When they pull the limited supply out of the planned testing, it slows down FDA approval, which means that one or more lives who could be saved down the road won't be, and that is based on a gamble.

At least by putting within the context of a trial, regardless of this outcome, the information learned will go toward saving additional lives down the road.

Response to cali (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Drug company will give ai...